FoxLAD Posted 6 November 2012 Posted 6 November 2012 If he isn't going to be played, much rather get rid and have a someone to come in who's going to cost us less in wages
LCFC_DAN Posted 6 November 2012 Posted 6 November 2012 Lingard is number 23 tonight! So looks like Lee Danns , is on his way out
Guest Bilo Posted 6 November 2012 Posted 6 November 2012 I challenge you to a Danns Off! In all honesty, can someone create a gif of Danns dancing? http://theuglydance.com/?v=zhrphtbmsn
Soar Fox Posted 6 November 2012 Posted 6 November 2012 Lingard is number 23 tonight! So looks like Lee Danns , is on his way out He wears number 8
hackneyfox Posted 6 November 2012 Posted 6 November 2012 There's a shock! The rest of the Championship can see a decent player and in truth so can Pearson, but those principles..... If this is to be believed then the team currently top plus other challengers seem to think he'll improve their midfields, this after Palace destroyed ours. Pearson mentioned 'other criteria' when Danns got on the bench last week.
ACF Posted 6 November 2012 Posted 6 November 2012 Lingard is number 23 tonight! So looks like Lee Danns , is on his way out He wears number 8
FantasticMrFuchs Posted 6 November 2012 Posted 6 November 2012 Like I said in one of my last posts he was due to sign for Palace before Freedman left. I expect him to be gone before the weekend
Carl the Llama Posted 6 November 2012 Posted 6 November 2012 Like I said in one of my last posts he was due to sign for Palace before Freedman left. I expect him to be gone before the weekend So a loan signing then, meaning he'll still be on our books if it goes through. I have no problem with that idea in general, but do we really have to keep loaning players out to teams seriously challenging us in the league?
Happy Fox Posted 6 November 2012 Posted 6 November 2012 Like I said in one of my last posts he was due to sign for Palace before Freedman left. I expect him to be gone before the weekend Do you reckon we will bring in a striker on loan?
FantasticMrFuchs Posted 6 November 2012 Posted 6 November 2012 Any player that leaves at the minute will be on loan, the transfer window it shut
5waller5 Posted 6 November 2012 Posted 6 November 2012 So a loan signing then, meaning he'll still be on our books if it goes through. I have no problem with that idea in general, but do we really have to keep loaning players out to teams seriously challenging us in the league? I wish. I could. Stop. Watching. Your sig!!
Carl the Llama Posted 6 November 2012 Posted 6 November 2012 Any player that leaves at the minute will be on loan, the transfer window it shut Erm, thanks?
5waller5 Posted 6 November 2012 Posted 6 November 2012 .... has to be one of the weirdest and most random few seconds of video ever!!!
Carl the Llama Posted 6 November 2012 Posted 6 November 2012 You're welcome Waller. I thought it was pretty apt since "window licking fox" could well be the description of half this board.
5waller5 Posted 6 November 2012 Posted 6 November 2012 You're welcome Waller. I thought it was pretty apt since "window licking fox" could well be the description of half this board. ..... agree .... 25% of all Google searches are completely original and have never been searched before (stat from a year or two ago so may not be quiet the case now) ..... got a feeling "window licking fox" may be one of those!!!
fleckneymike Posted 6 November 2012 Posted 6 November 2012 If we assume he's one of our higher earners and he's not a starter then we are best off saving money.
5waller5 Posted 6 November 2012 Posted 6 November 2012 If we assume he's one of our higher earners and he's not a starter then we are best off saving money. What's that got to do with window licking foxes??!!!!!
indierich06 Posted 7 November 2012 Posted 7 November 2012 There's a shock! The rest of the Championship can see a decent player and in truth so can Pearson, but those principles..... Will you stop making up bullshit please? Danns isn't playing because he's nowhere near as good as Drinkwater, King or James. Simple as. What ****ing principles are you on about? He played him in nearly every game last season he was available for last season, now we've got better options he's not playing, there's no conspiracy there as much as you want there to be. I for one can't wait to see the back of him. A thoroughly average midfielder on a massive pay packet who isn't half as good as the other CMs we've got.
Simo86 Posted 7 November 2012 Posted 7 November 2012 Saw the thread title and it just made me think of this
Happy Fox Posted 14 November 2012 Posted 14 November 2012 He is off today I guess with Wellens back in the fold it makes sense neil danns â€@dannzy1 Hey tweeps bit of news that is a bit sad and happy, I will be joining a club on loan later today, I can't announce who yet but I will Follow neil dannsâ€@dannzy1 As you know I need to play games so will be going out for a month
cc_star Posted 14 November 2012 Posted 14 November 2012 As you know I need to play games so will be going out for a month It's for a month, so will be good for him to get some game time, he can then either get in the shop window for January or come back here and do a job. Good news all round
glenny_fox Posted 14 November 2012 Posted 14 November 2012 Was always going to happen, and only for a month which is benficial to all parties involved.
Happy Fox Posted 14 November 2012 Posted 14 November 2012 Follow neil dannsâ€@dannzy1 i can say its not leeds tweeps but thanks for the support , just cause im getting hundreds of tweets from you guys
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.