Soar Fox Posted 20 January 2013 Posted 20 January 2013 http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/news/4753651/lithuanian-immigrant-youre-a-soft-touch.html#comment-rig
Harry - LCFC Posted 20 January 2013 Posted 20 January 2013 It isn't just immigrants who do this, there are plenty of British citizens who live off the benefits system - they're just as bad.
AKCJ Posted 20 January 2013 Posted 20 January 2013 But she does have one criticism. Natalija moaned: “I think they should help pay for private nannies, rather than just free nursery.â€Read more: http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/news/4753651/lithuanian-immigrant-youre-a-soft-touch.html#ixzz2IXLGgntH That quote pissed me off.
The Year Of The Fox Posted 20 January 2013 Posted 20 January 2013 You should have to pay a minimum into the state before being allowed to have kids
rico Posted 20 January 2013 Posted 20 January 2013 Shes just one of the thousands bleeding the country dry
Fox92 Posted 20 January 2013 Posted 20 January 2013 I'm positive we'd be better off without any government.
The Blur Posted 20 January 2013 Posted 20 January 2013 This might sound bit shocking but in some ways I don't blame her. Once you get redundant and get on the benefits and build a lifestyle around it then it will be hard to get off it especially if it mean you now will be not longer be able to afford all of necessaries. To be fair, she is clearly taking the piss regarding the holidays and she doesn't look likes she is applying for jobs.
Harry - LCFC Posted 20 January 2013 Posted 20 January 2013 You should have to pay a minimum into the state before being allowed to have kids You can't ban people from having kids, it is a basic human right you know? However, I might limit the child benefit families can have if they don't contribute enough through tax.
The Blur Posted 20 January 2013 Posted 20 January 2013 The minimum wage levels and benefits cap need sorting out so the minimum wage rate pay more than maximum benefit cap yet the maximum benefit cap need to be enough for people to have a reasonable lifestyle.
Rincewind Posted 20 January 2013 Posted 20 January 2013 Benefits are there in order that people with no income can live. The amount due is set out according to circumstance. As long as a person follows the guidelines and claims the correct amount I have no problem with them. The same goes when paying tax. As long as a person pays the correct amount set out by law that is fine. I am not just saying this because I claim.
The Year Of The Fox Posted 20 January 2013 Posted 20 January 2013 You can't ban people from having kids, it is a basic human right you know? Yeh, and half of those want banning too
z-layrex Posted 20 January 2013 Posted 20 January 2013 I do the odd shift on maternity looking after women for a couple hours post c-section, and so many of the couples dont have jobs. Just sucking the country dry with their chavy little offspring.
Soar Fox Posted 20 January 2013 Author Posted 20 January 2013 Benefits are there in order that people with no income can live. But she's not claiming benefits just to live. She's getting benefits and then going on luxury holidays abroad.
Harry - LCFC Posted 20 January 2013 Posted 20 January 2013 Yeh, and half of those want banning too Basic human rights need to be banned, is that what you meant? We really are on a slippery slope if people want these taken away. I'd love to hear which ones you'd like to have removed. Right to privacy Right to live, exist Right to have a family To own property Free Speech Safety from violence Equality of both males and females; women's rights Fair trial To be innocent until proven guilty To be a citizen of a country To be recognized as a person The right to express his or her sexual orientation To vote To seek asylum if a country treats you badly To think freely To believe and practice the religion a person wants To peacefully protest (speak against) a government or group Health care (medical care) Education To communicate through a language Not be forced into marriage The right to love The right to work The right to express onesel
Danizen Posted 20 January 2013 Posted 20 January 2013 I'm positive we'd be better off without any government. "Everyone's a libertarian until it's their state under 10ft of water."
The Year Of The Fox Posted 20 January 2013 Posted 20 January 2013 Basic human rights need to be banned, is that what you meant? We really are on a slippery slope if people want these taken away. I'd love to hear which ones you'd like to have removed. I said half. Without meaning half. Basic Human Rights that are important are rights to fresh water, rights to a fair court trial etc. Not to raise an offspring every year, or the Abu Qatadar (sp) farce we've been reading about last year. There's a huge diffference. Saying all Human Rights are a good thing is as daft as saying all Human Rights are a bad thing.
Rincewind Posted 20 January 2013 Posted 20 January 2013 Ban human rights for the low paid, starving under privileged for a start. That will satisfy some.
pSinatra Posted 20 January 2013 Posted 20 January 2013 Lets face it.... shes on the game. It's the first thing I thought!! She ain't bad. I wonder how much?
Rincewind Posted 20 January 2013 Posted 20 January 2013 But if somebody has kids then made redundant it is a bit late to abort.
The Year Of The Fox Posted 20 January 2013 Posted 20 January 2013 But if somebody has kids then made redundant it is a bit late to abort. But she'd have paid x amount into society in the first place
Harry - LCFC Posted 20 January 2013 Posted 20 January 2013 I said half. Without meaning half. Basic Human Rights that are important are rights to fresh water, rights to a fair court trial etc. Not to raise an offspring every year, or the Abu Qatadar (sp) farce we've been reading about last year. There's a huge diffference. Saying all Human Rights are a good thing is as daft as saying all Human Rights are a bad thing. Well I've just added them onto my previous post so if you'd like to tell me which ones you'd like to have removed I can get on with criticising you for your opinion because every one of them is perfectly fine. To be honest, I don't think you really want them removed, you're annoyed about something else I think - None of the rights in the list give people the right to live comfortably which is what I suspect you're really angry about - People can live pretty poor lives with all those rights covered but that's fine because you should have to earn the privilege of living comfortably.
The Year Of The Fox Posted 20 January 2013 Posted 20 January 2013 Well I've just added them onto my previous post so if you'd like to tell me which ones you'd like to have removed I can get on with criticising you for your opinion because every one of them is perfectly fine. To be honest, I don't think you really want them removed, you're annoyed about something else I think - None of the rights in the list give people the right to live comfortably which is what I suspect you're really angry about - People can live pretty poor lives with all those rights covered but that's fine because you should have to earn the privilege of living comfortably. Precisely, and has this woman earnt the right? Is that the full list of them? Can't see the right to fresh water for instance.
purpleronnie Posted 20 January 2013 Posted 20 January 2013 I just find it strange so many people get angry when so few immigrants claim benefits.
The Year Of The Fox Posted 20 January 2013 Posted 20 January 2013 Basic human rights need to be banned, is that what you meant? We really are on a slippery slope if people want these taken away. I'd love to hear which ones you'd like to have removed. Right to privacy Right to live, exist Right to have a family To own property Free Speech Safety from violence Equality of both males and females; women's rights Fair trial To be innocent until proven guilty To be a citizen of a country To be recognized as a person The right to express his or her sexual orientation To vote To seek asylum if a country treats you badly To think freely To believe and practice the religion a person wants To peacefully protest (speak against) a government or group Health care (medical care) Education To communicate through a language Not be forced into marriage The right to love The right to work The right to express onesel These are really strictly inforced aren't they in this country?! They're well meaning rights, but half of them aren't necessary. I mean 'the right to live'?? The government have allowed too many people to get away with stuff hiding behind these for too long. Would stopping people from having kids tilthey've contributed financially to society really be a bad thing??
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.