Guest Col city fan Posted 16 April 2013 Posted 16 April 2013 C'mon then guys.. Give it to me... 2-1 Leicester for me Wood with a brace. Win this, we go 5th...
Harry - LCFC Posted 16 April 2013 Posted 16 April 2013 Winning 1-0 going into the final five minutes........and...................... we hold onto it this time!
kingfox Posted 16 April 2013 Posted 16 April 2013 I'm going back down to earth here for a minute. 1-1 draw I think.
Guest kristianity77 Posted 16 April 2013 Posted 16 April 2013 yeah, its gotta be put into perspective. Its still piss poor form. A draw at best
Fox92 Posted 16 April 2013 Posted 16 April 2013 yeah, its gotta be put into perspective. Its still piss poor form. A draw at best Two out of form teams then.
shiv Posted 16 April 2013 Posted 16 April 2013 I'm going back down to earth here for a minute. 1-1 draw I think. I reckon it'll be 1-1 as well.
acooling08 Posted 16 April 2013 Posted 16 April 2013 Palace are on a bad run and got trashed by Ipswich tonight. I reckon we'll do them. Palace 1 (Phillips) Leicester 3 (James, Wood x2)
Jon25747 Posted 16 April 2013 Posted 16 April 2013 yeah, its gotta be put into perspective. Its still piss poor form. A draw at best Not lost in 3 is certainly a sharp upturn in form
lcfcsnow Posted 16 April 2013 Posted 16 April 2013 I expect we'll line up 442 as Pearson rarely changes a winning team/formation but I just can't see us winning or even drawing there playing that way. We did reasonably well at Brighton with a 3 man midfield, we need a similar setup as Palace have the likes of Dikgacoi and Jedinak in their midfield.
Grewks Posted 16 April 2013 Posted 16 April 2013 Palace 1 - Leicester 4 I hope for once NP changes a winning team, De Laet will need cover when facing bolasie/zaha. Play Knockaert and we will get torn to pieces. .........................kasper de laet...morgan.........Keane...Konch Moore....James...........King.......Dyer ..................................Schlupp .....................Wood
Grewks Posted 16 April 2013 Posted 16 April 2013 I expect we'll line up 442 as Pearson rarely changes a winning team/formation but I just can't see us winning or even drawing there playing that way. We did reasonably well at Brighton with a 3 man midfield, we need a similar setup as Palace have the likes of Dikgacoi and Jedinak in their midfield. Dikgacoi and jedinak are not creative at all. Stop supply to the wings (just like any holloway side) and they look average.
Father Ted Posted 16 April 2013 Posted 16 April 2013 5-0 Leicester Schlupp (3), Knockaert, Vardy Paddy McCarthy straight red for an elbow on Wood and Zaha to get sent off for two yellow cards for diving COYB!!! :pearson: :scarf:
NewburyFox Posted 16 April 2013 Posted 16 April 2013 A quick read of their forum suggests that they're not a happy bunch! Anyway, I'll go for 2-2...
NewburyFox Posted 16 April 2013 Posted 16 April 2013 Just seen that Palace haven't scored in 5 games! I'll change my prediction to 0-4...
One Arm Babba Posted 16 April 2013 Posted 16 April 2013 Not phased by palace, least of all Zaha. His performance will wane now he is closer to the move to United. A couple of meaty tackles and he'll get the hint that its not worth the risk. I think we draw this one 0-0 and beat Watford next week. Hopefully a point at forest will then be enough.
gotwood Posted 16 April 2013 Posted 16 April 2013 Palace cant buy a goal, so in theory if we take our chances we should win I'm going 1-3 win, Keane, Wood, Nugent
Happy Fox Posted 16 April 2013 Posted 16 April 2013 Reckon this game will be the feature match for BBC football league?
deanolegend1989 Posted 16 April 2013 Posted 16 April 2013 Amaazing the sudden optamism after 1 win! A very lucky 1 at that! down to earth with a bump on sat me thinks. Hope im wrong obviously but really would you be more suprised if we lost again or if we actually made it 2 out of 2 away at a place like Palace? Their form of no goals in 5 is bound to end against us. 2-1 Palace...Murray and Bolassi, King with ours.
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.