Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content
ruisliptiger

No To Hull Tigers

Recommended Posts

Posted

Money talks.

Just look at Cardiff. And who will be next? Maybe the new owner at Fulham likes a cheeky chirpy shade of Cerise and their kit will be diamante encrusted next season?

 

The bottom line is Football clubs who want to go places need an injection of cash, and these rich foreign guys willing to pump it in want their own way. So for the fan there are two choices, go along with the loony running your club or piss them off and watch your club turn to shit.

Posted

Money talks.

Just look at Cardiff. And who will be next? Maybe the new owner at Fulham likes a cheeky chirpy shade of Cerise and their kit will be diamante encrusted next season?

The bottom line is Football clubs who want to go places need an injection of cash, and these rich foreign guys willing to pump it in want their own way. So for the fan there are two choices, go along with the loony running your club or piss them off and watch your club turn to shit.

And isn't that a damning indictment of the sad state of the current game at or near the top?

Football has sold it's soul to the devil in the £££ outfit, and far too many fans, desperate for some success to live through, have gone along with it.

Posted

And isn't that a damning indictment of the sad state of the current game at or near the top?

Football has sold it's soul to the devil in the £££ outfit, and far too many fans, desperate for some success to live through, have gone along with it.

 

Exactly.

Do fans protest when these rich guys come in? NO

They rub their hands together and the thought of 'Doing a Chelsea' and dream of European evenings under the lights etc.

 

So if you are happy to make a deal with the devil in the first place, don't be surprised when the devil in question turns out to be a stubborn egotistic control freak that wants things how he sees it.

 

And that goes for Leicester also, OK we've not had our shirt or name changed, but the silent seemingly invisible elephant in the room is all the money our owners has put in has been LOANED to our club at 8% interest. So lets cut through all the we love your club crap and realise very quickly that these people are businessmen who are not used to being told no when they want something.

Posted

Were people as obsessed with on pitch success back in the 70's and 80's as they are now?

I can't help but feel that since the match day experience and subsequently the fan demographic has changed, fans have become less interested in having fun with mates at the weekend and more so with getting to the premier league and staying there, whatever the cost is I.e clubs name changing or club colours changing.

Posted

It's all about what happens on the pitch for the vast majority now and very little about what happens in the stands. Simple as that. Not sure which way it swung pre-$ky/Premier League.

Posted

Money talks.

Just look at Cardiff. And who will be next? Maybe the new owner at Fulham likes a cheeky chirpy shade of Cerise and their kit will be diamante encrusted next season?

 

The bottom line is Football clubs who want to go places need an injection of cash, and these rich foreign guys willing to pump it in want their own way. So for the fan there are two choices, go along with the loony running your club or piss them off and watch your club turn to shit.

 

It's this kind of thing that'll make our success so very, very sweet when it comes around. We'll have done it the proper way without excessive spending, with a squad who wants to play for the club and without the bullshit kit changes, name changes etc.

 

We're doing it the right way which is part of the reason I'm so adamant we stick with the current set up, it's so damn likeable.

Posted

It's this kind of thing that'll make our success so very, very sweet when it comes around. We'll have done it the proper way without excessive spending, with a squad who wants to play for the club and without the bullshit kit changes, name changes etc.

 

We're doing it the right way which is part of the reason I'm so adamant we stick with the current set up, it's so damn likeable.

 

I don't agree, we are in debt to our owners to the point that the club would not exist if they walked away and demanded their money back.

Posted

I keep going to start a post in this thread and then realizing I can't be arsed because football has a habit of turning otherwise intelligent people in to ****ing idiots.

Bottom line is, if you're more inclined to get organized and protest being called Hull Tigers instead of Hull City or wearing red instead of wearing blue than you are to protest disgusting ticket prices, disgusting player wages, rejection of safe standing, ridiculous TV deals keeping the richest clubs richest and making our top flight a procession, clubs like ourselves, Man City and Chelski risking crippling debt to buy success, the foul shambles in Qatar and **** knows what else then you're a ****.

Oh and if you've paid money in to any of the above but you've had the audacity to tell Wimbledon, Cardiff or Hull fans that they're plastic sellouts if they don't boycott then you're an even bigger **** and a hypocrite.

Posted

I don't agree, we are in debt to our owners to the point that the club would not exist if they walked away and demanded their money back.

 

Our debt isn't helping us to succeed though. We'd be in a better position if we didn't owe money whereas clubs in the past fuelled their promotion charge through borrowed money to spend on their squad, we haven't really done that.

 

I think it's even more reason to be proud of our methods personally  :P  We're trying to go up in spite of debt rather than because of it.

Posted

Our debt isn't helping us to succeed though. We'd be in a better position if we didn't owe money whereas clubs in the past fuelled their promotion charge through borrowed money to spend on their squad, we haven't really done that.

I think it's even more reason to be proud of our methods personally :P We're trying to go up in spite of debt rather than because of it.

Are you high? The only reason we stopped trying to buy success is FFP which we could still fall well short of meeting.

If Watford fans were right about one thing it's that we're run disgracefully. Just because QPR have taken the spotlight off us and we're now desperately shedding resources, it doesn't make us some shiningexample to everyone else.

Posted

If we voted with our feet then how are we supposed to mount a visible protest? I'm sure IF, and that's a big if. The name change happens, then people will vote with their feet. Having spoken with many, many fans this will happen. There will be no hiding that fact when our crowds are 10,000 down next year.

 

I have every confidence though that the name change will not happen. Even highly regarded marketing experts are now chipping in to say that Allams theory is garbage. There are only so many holes that a dam, even of Assam Allams scale can cope with.

 

The only people showing support for a change are the sort of people who choose what political party to support based on who their parent voted for. 

 

You've had a bit of media attention since that TV match. But guess what? Allam didn't give a shit. He's still going ahead with it.

 

FFS stop giving him your money.

 

Maybe the FA won't approve it. I really hope they don't. But these protests aren't the thing that will stop it happening.

Posted

 

Hull manager Steve Bruce believes Allam should be granted his wish.

He said last month: ''I can understand [the unhappiness] because in our country especially we are really big traditionalists and a lot of people have supported the club since the year dot, where it has been Hull City AFC.

''But the owner has come in and he's in a different culture and for the money he has put into the club if he thinks Hull Tigers is his way forward then we have to respect it.

''If he asks us to play in pink and white stripes on Saturday we have to do it because without him there wouldn't be either a Hull City or a Hull Tigers."

 

Doesn't this piss you off, ruislip?

Posted

Our debt isn't helping us to succeed though. We'd be in a better position if we didn't owe money whereas clubs in the past fuelled their promotion charge through borrowed money to spend on their squad, we haven't really done that.

 

I think it's even more reason to be proud of our methods personally  :P  We're trying to go up in spite of debt rather than because of it.

 

What do you think most of the money was spent on mate? Because it wasn't all spunked lining up high class brasses for Sven if you'll pardon the pun.

The money went on players.... and a lot of shit players in some cases... Beckford.. Mills etc.

What you fail to acknowledge is that our club has not been invested in, it's been loaned to at 8% interest. 

So we might not be having our name changed, but we are being played with in a dangerous manner.

Posted

Proud of what we are doing? We have accumulated three times the debt that sent us into administration and are reliant on an individual hanging around (whilst juicing us to coin a loan sharks phrase) to keep the club alive. It's ****ing disgraceful.

As for Hull fans its time to either put up or shut up, if you still go to watch and spend your money you deserve everything you get.

I can't believe buying a ticket and holding up a banner didn't change is mind.

lol

Posted

Are you high? The only reason we stopped trying to buy success is FFP which we could still fall well short of meeting.

If Watford fans were right about one thing it's that we're run disgracefully. Just because QPR have taken the spotlight off us and we're now desperately shedding resources, it doesn't make us some shiningexample to everyone else.

 

It doesn't bother me that the rule changes are the reason we're cutting back, the fact remains that we're moving towards more 'moral' methods, other clubs aren't of course.

 

Promotion this season would be acquired in the right way on the whole and yet we're supposed to apologise for it? I certainly won't. The past was bad I agree and yes our 2003 promotion can definitely be criticised but I certainly won't feel guilty should we go up this season.

Posted

It's all about what happens on the pitch for the vast majority now and very little about what happens in the stands. Simple as that. Not sure which way it swung pre-$ky/Premier League.

It's not even what happens on the pitch for many it's whether we get 3 points after 90 mins even if it is through playing shit football.

 

Football has always been about winning but it used to be about winning in an entertaining fashion something which too much money has washed away as the perils of defeat/relegation are so much greater now.

Posted

At least the FA are going to attempt to discuss the issue with fan groups. Probably lip service but it's at least a platform........ Hull had better make sure that their fan representatives are well schooled to have any chance.

Posted

It's this kind of thing that'll make our success so very, very sweet when it comes around. We'll have done it the proper way without excessive spending, with a squad who wants to play for the club and without the bullshit kit changes, name changes etc.

 

We're doing it the right way which is part of the reason I'm so adamant we stick with the current set up, it's so damn likeable.

lol lol lol Really

 

Thats why we owe them 50mill plus intrest.

Oh and the 20mill plus they bought the ground for that sits in there name not the name of LCFC.

 

Oh and I suspect the 50mill will be more at the end of this season as we will still make an operating loss.

 

They did not give the money we have spent they lent the club the money and at the moment it's all failed.

Fingers X we make it this year.

 

Ps The only reason our owners are not pissing more money up the wall is cos the rules don't allow it now.

Posted

lol lol lol Really

 

Thats why we owe them 50mill plus intrest.

Oh and the 20mill plus they bought the ground for that sits in there name not the name of LCFC.

 

Oh and I suspect the 50mill will be more at the end of this season as we will still make an operating loss.

 

They did not give the money we have spent they lent the club the money and at the moment it's all failed.

Fingers X we make it this year.

 

Ps The only reason our owners are not pissing more money up the wall is cos the rules don't allow it now.

 

These debts of ours were not accumulated this season for the most part so they should be thought of as part of our methods this year. They came largely in the past when I agree we did not behave well at all. Again I really have to emphasise when this happened exactly: right now we aren't really a borrow and spend club so it's unfair to give big criticism of the current set up for this.

 

I don't want to be rude or anything but you all keep making the same mistake in my eyes and that is attributing past misbehaviour to what we're doing now. I also dislike what we've done, believe me I do, our 2003 promotion was plain wrong and but that was before and this is now. Either way I have it very clear in my mind that we are currently a pretty well behaved club which makes me happy.

 

To address the words you highlighted: "we're doing it the right way." Yes, we are. But at the same time it's definitely true that we weren't doing it the right way.

Posted

Here are a couple of cut and paste Blog entries from City Till We Die. The sentiments of which I back wholeheartedly.

 

CITY TILL WE DIE STATEMENT

 

The City Till We Die campaign group is disappointed to learn that Hull City AFC has formally written to the Football Association requesting to change the name of our club to Hull Tigers, as of the 2014-2015 season. When City Till We Die met with Hull City AFC owner Dr Assem Allam on 1 November, he assured us that any name change would not occur for two to three years, and that it would not go ahead without supporter consultation, or without the benefits being proven by research. No such research or consultation has taken place.

Commentators on the sport and experts in marketing alike have reacted to Dr Allam’s name-change plans with widespread derision, while his intemperate remarks about Hull City supporters have been roundly condemned. Single-mindedness is not the only way to win respect; listening to the counsel of others and being prepared to concede that you may have made a mistake can also be a sign of strength. Sadly, the events of recent weeks suggest that our owner may not appreciate this.  

This matter is now in the hands of the only people who have the right to make such a decision: the football authorities. On 2 December, City Till We Die supplied the FA with a timeline dossier on the name-change proposals, for their consideration. On 4 December we met with officials of the Premier League, who told us that any such material changes to the heritage of British football should be carried out in consultation with supporters and wider stakeholders in the game. They also assured us that they would approach the FA to discuss how these important matters can be protected within the framework of their respective rules.

The FA is an organisation with a rich and proud history; this year, it is celebrating its 150th anniversary. This Saturday, as part of those celebrations, numerous FA dignitaries will be at the KC Stadium to honour Hull-born Ebenezer Cobb Morley, one of the founding fathers of Association Football. We remain confident that, with the eyes of the whole footballing world upon them, the FA will make the right decision, and act to protect not only the heritage and traditions of Hull City AFC, but also those of other clubs whose identities may come under threat in the future. This issue matters for all football supporters, not just the people of Hull, and the decision the FA makes will set a very important precedent. 

We urge Hull City AFC supporters who wish to keep our historic name to continue the peaceful and dignified campaigning which has brought us messages of support from all around the world, to make their voices heard by the FA both this Saturday and over the coming weeks, and to sign our petition at citytillwedie.com/petition.

CITY TILL WE DIE


LET THE FA KNOW

 

Now that the club has officially written to the Football Association requesting to change our playing name to “Hull Tigersâ€, the time is right to focus our campaign on the FA. And there is no better time to be doing so than during our home game against Stoke City. 

The FA are celebrating 150 years of their history this year. As part of the celebrations, Saturday 14 December has been designated Ebenezer Morley Day, in honour of the Hull-born man who was the FA’s first secretary, and is considered one of the founding fathers of Association Football. FA dignitaries will be at the KC to watch the game, so let’s make our voices heard loud and clear!

In addition to the “City Till I Die†song we sing at 19.04 minutes into every game, we are encouraging City supporters to sing two extra songs. Join us in singing “We say no, FA, we say no†and “Everywhere we go, let the FA know, we are Hull Cityâ€, and keep the songs going at future games. 

And that’s not the only way you can help us make sure, over the coming weeks, that the custodians of the game understand the strength of feeling on this subject. As promised, we will producing and distributing “No To Hull Tigers†postcards to send to the FA. In the meantime, if you feel passionately about the name change proposal, you can contact the FA by the following means: 

Fans’ View phoneline: 0844 980 0699

Email: [email protected]

Post: The Football Association, Wembley Stadium, PO Box 1966, London, SW1P 9EQ

Twitter: @FA

Sign our petition: http://www.citytillwedie.com/petition

Let the FA know!

CITY TILL WE DIE

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...