purpleronnie Posted 14 October 2014 Posted 14 October 2014 There was a white fiat uno in the tunnel that had it's paint work on diannas car, this car was never found, NEVER FOUND, there was around 10 cameras where the crash happened not one of them was recording on the night, and a key whitness due to give vital evidence dies, a A Muslim marrying into the royal family?? Who knows So because the car wasn't found it a) alone was the cause of the crash b)Was driven by someone paid to kill Diana by the royal family....a huge stretch methinks and is no evidence at all. The surveillance cameras on the private and public buildings along the route are only trained on the fronts of the buildings they protect. There was one camera above the underpass which shut's at 11pm. There remains no evidence to suggest that this was anything more than a tragic accident.
lestajigs Posted 14 October 2014 Posted 14 October 2014 I'm sure MI6 would have used something better than a Fiat Uno to take out Diana. I was just reading some conspiracy theories about Nobel prize winner Malala Yousafzai. Her assassination attempt was done by the CIA to get support for continued drone strikes in the Swat Valley area of Pakistan against the Taliban. Complete BS if you ask me. http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-asia-29568637 Oh yes, James Bond would just fire a couple of missiles out of the front of his Aston Martin db5
Rincewind Posted 14 October 2014 Posted 14 October 2014 Would it not have been simpler to pay a hitman to do the job? Then the security forces take him out before arrest. He would be someone who would not be missed, a loner with a troubled past. Mental issues and dislike of authority. It would not be hard to 'find' enough evidence to convince the public. But no doubt some would question this scenario.
Rincewind Posted 15 October 2014 Posted 15 October 2014 Zingari and El Empty had better watch their backs. So who is included under this new definition of extremists? Are we just talking about people who allegedly bomb buildings? Well, according to David Cameron, the law will target “non-violent conspiracy theorists” who he claims are just as dangerous as the ISIS terrorists and must therefore, be eradicated. He referenced 9/11 and 7/7 Truthers as examples of the type of extremism that must be dealt in a similar fashion to ISIS. http://akashictimes.co.uk/david-cameron-unveils-plans-to-ban-free-speech-and-protest/ Must be a joke. Surely they would not go that far.
Guest seanfox778 Posted 30 October 2014 Posted 30 October 2014 I hope this is true, I like a story like this: http://metro.co.uk/2014/10/27/area-51-scientist-makes-amazing-deathbed-confession-about-aliens-4923532/
Rincewind Posted 30 October 2014 Posted 30 October 2014 I hope this is true, I like a story like this: http://metro.co.uk/2014/10/27/area-51-scientist-makes-amazing-deathbed-confession-about-aliens-4923532/ Well they cannot cross examine him now. A great joke to play on his death bed.
sphericalfox Posted 12 December 2014 Posted 12 December 2014 'Technical problem' = 'compromised'. :xmaswink: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-30454240
Sir Fynwy Posted 12 December 2014 Posted 12 December 2014 'Technical problem' = 'compromised'. :xmaswink: http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-30454240 Russian hackers get everywhere
LCFC Rennie Posted 16 December 2014 Posted 16 December 2014 How would it benefit our government by killing Diana?
Guest MattP Posted 16 December 2014 Posted 16 December 2014 Assasination by car crash as well, brilliant. She'd only spent the few weeks before sailing around on a boat with him as well away from everyone, I mean that wouldn't be the time to do it would it?
Rincewind Posted 17 December 2014 Posted 17 December 2014 Yest I find the assassination by car a bit of a odd method. People have survived car crashes.At least the CIA had a believable enemy to pin the 9/11 crash on.
Guest MattP Posted 17 December 2014 Posted 17 December 2014 Do you believe the CIA was responsible for 9/11 Ken? Do you believe Al Queda exist?
David Guiza Posted 17 December 2014 Posted 17 December 2014 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b4meFC1ee7Q May have been posted before, but love this sketch on the Diana theorists. The only ones i've ever really read into any great detail are JFK and 9/11. The JFK ones are ridiculous, Lee Harvey Oswals was an absolute sociopath who shouldn't have been allowed within a mile of any situation like that. And whilst I don't believe there was anything ridiculously suspect about the 9/11 attacks, the entire event could and should have been handled far great than it was - as can be said for almost any tragedy of that type.
Rincewind Posted 17 December 2014 Posted 17 December 2014 Do you believe the CIA was responsible for 9/11 Ken? Do you believe Al Queda exist? Of course don't believe the CIA were responsible. I wanted to show how ridiculous some of these theories were.
johnny the fox Posted 10 January 2015 Posted 10 January 2015 Just throwing it out there. very strange.. not sure what it means though.
Steven Posted 11 January 2015 Posted 11 January 2015 very strange.. not sure what it means though. The outright lying power of the media.
johnny the fox Posted 11 January 2015 Posted 11 January 2015 The outright lying power of the media. yip.. but to what ends?
sphericalfox Posted 11 January 2015 Posted 11 January 2015 http://youtu.be/QUuYSft1fOw the guy laughs like a loon, but I'd be interested to know, even if that's a reporter on the roof, why they knew they needed armour
johnny the fox Posted 11 January 2015 Posted 11 January 2015 http://youtu.be/QUuYSft1fOw the guy laughs like a loon, but I'd be interested to know, even if that's a reporter on the roof, why they knew they needed armour problem is.. lots of questions but no real answers..
marko Posted 11 January 2015 Posted 11 January 2015 Just throwing it out there. You'd better tell them their loved one isn't really dead. http://www.theguardian.com/world/2015/jan/11/charlie-hebdo-attack-police-officer-ahmed-merabet-tribute Or are they in on it too? Out of interest, who actually gains from this alleged false flag attack?
Babylon Posted 11 January 2015 Posted 11 January 2015 problem is.. lots of questions but no real answers.. Probably because they don't really need answering.
whitlock Posted 12 January 2015 Posted 12 January 2015 But the human head isn't a watermelon and I would imagine if the bullet didn't exit the head then there wouldn't be massive blood loss. Although, if the camera had stayed filming the policeman, you would probably start to see all of the blood exiting the head. I think some people just have a lot of spare time on their hands when making videos like that.
Babylon Posted 12 January 2015 Posted 12 January 2015 But the human head isn't a watermelon and I would imagine if the bullet didn't exit the head then there wouldn't be massive blood loss. Although, if the camera had stayed filming the policeman, you would probably start to see all of the blood exiting the head. I think some people just have a lot of spare time on their hands when making videos like that. I think people have been watching too many films if they expect heads exploding and blood all over the place instantly. Rather big flaw in the argument for the people on the roof wearing bullet proof vests... if it's all fake, why would they need to be wearing bullet proof vests at all. And if they are in on it, why the hell would they be letting people up there with them to film it. Some really desperate stuff... again... surprise surprise.
danny. Posted 17 January 2015 Posted 17 January 2015 You'd better tell them their loved one isn't really dead. http://www.theguardian.com/world/2015/jan/11/charlie-hebdo-attack-police-officer-ahmed-merabet-tribute Or are they in on it too? Out of interest, who actually gains from this alleged false flag attack? Israel
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.