Dickov22 Posted 22 February 2015 Posted 22 February 2015 'We need to stop going behind in games, we need to take the lead more' So he plays 5 defenders and 1 striker today. Jesus Christ. I've almost had it with him
Fox92 Posted 22 February 2015 Posted 22 February 2015 We won't score with one up front. Why not go for it? People question why Burnley are somehow above us and it's because they go for it, with two forwards, no matter who they play or where they play. We need to score to stay up. We won't do that with one up front again. FFS.
AKCJ Posted 22 February 2015 Posted 22 February 2015 We need to stop going behind so we've gone with extra defenders? Criminal....
Matt Posted 22 February 2015 Posted 22 February 2015 We need to stop going behind so we've gone with extra defenders? Criminal.... With Schwarzer and Morgan in that defence you can have all the extra defenders in the world we'll still conceade.
Dickov22 Posted 22 February 2015 Author Posted 22 February 2015 We need to stop going behind so we've gone with extra defenders? Criminal.... We are playing one up front. 5 at the back is just waiting to go behind. Asking teams to come at us. Crazy.
Fox92 Posted 22 February 2015 Posted 22 February 2015 We need to stop going behind so we've gone with extra defenders? Criminal.... I'd accept 3/5 at the back if we were playing with wing backs. But another 4 in front means we have 1 up front and 1 up front is pointless. As I said above, Kramaric won't get much of the ball.
l444ry Posted 22 February 2015 Posted 22 February 2015 Don't mind the system myself. But with Simpson and Konchesky as full backs means we'll probably be on the back foot...............again! Seems three centre halfs is the only way he can keep Morgan in the side.
Dickov22 Posted 22 February 2015 Author Posted 22 February 2015 We should only play wing backs if we have Schlupp and De Laet in the side. Surely
Matt Posted 22 February 2015 Posted 22 February 2015 Whinge whinge whinge etc I'm gonna play a game of catchphrase. Happy Say what you see.
iancognito Posted 22 February 2015 Posted 22 February 2015 People have spent half the season moaning that we're one of the few sides to play 4442, that we get over-run in the middle etc etc and when he doen't play 442 or 4411 people moan that we've not got enough up top?!? The problem last week came when we changed to 442, Ulloa came on and we created fvck all. Our two best efforts came when we were in a tight 541. Same against Arsenal, we created decent chances in 541 then nothing when we went to 442. Just see how it goes before you moan.
Fox92 Posted 22 February 2015 Posted 22 February 2015 Whinge whinge whinge etc We're bottom of the league. What do you expect?
Matt Posted 22 February 2015 Posted 22 February 2015 We're bottom of the league. What do you expect? Be happy, bury your head in the sand, ignore everything, you can only be positive on here however negative this situation is! I believe that rule is actually in the conditions of signing up to this site nowadays.
whoareyaaa Posted 22 February 2015 Posted 22 February 2015 Don't mind the system myself. But with Simpson and Konchesky as full backs means we'll probably be on the back foot...............again! Seems three centre halfs is the only way he can keep Morgan in the side. that's why hes gone 3 at the back.
Number 6 Posted 22 February 2015 Posted 22 February 2015 Would rather 3-5-2 than 5-4-1. Provides a partner for Kramaric whilst keeping 3 CBs. Also means we don't have to play our awful fullbacks. Just not sure where Mahrez fits into it.
weller54 Posted 22 February 2015 Posted 22 February 2015 Pearson's philosophy.. If plan A doesn't work.... Go to Plan A!!!!
Mark Posted 22 February 2015 Posted 22 February 2015 Would rather 3-5-2 than 5-4-1. Provides a partner for Kramaric whilst keeping 3 CBs. Also means we don't have to play our awful fullbacks. Just not sure where Mahrez fits into it.Play him off Kramaric if RDL and Schlupp are providing the width in a 352, surely better than this mind numbing shite. Seems we have a striker who can finally finish chances but given up creating them.
Number 6 Posted 22 February 2015 Posted 22 February 2015 Play him off Kramaric if RDL and Schlupp are providing the width in a 352, surely better than this mind numbing shite. Seems we have a striker who can finally finish chances but given up creating them. Yes I can imagine him there but it's untested.
theessexfox Posted 22 February 2015 Posted 22 February 2015 The system seems to be working better for us than the last one, I suspect Nigel may have played this from the outset if Upson had been fit.
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.