Paninistickers

It's absurd and plain for all to see that it's designed to assist the big clubs (who'd never, ever agree to a salary cap, but why should a sport need their agreement?) As a salary cap is out of the window, the only realistic rule changes could be 1. Squad capped at 25 2. No loaning of players to a club in same division (on the basis of conflict of interest) 3. A cap of only three contracted players allowed to be loaned out to other divisions (to avoid Chelsea and man city stockpiling)

Sign Mikey Johnston. Dunno about anything else tho.

Ou est Pub Breath?

83 was both brilliant for a 15 game run to get into third, but anticlimatic, because promotion was confirmed a few days later. Fulham having protested to the football league that Derby fans ran on the pitch with a minute left to play causing an abandonment. So was a wait for the FL meeting at Lytham St Annes to rubber stamp our promotion

With a bit of relief now, it's been a humbling season. Lots to like about the championship and its competitors, just not the financial ruin it leads to. No VAR. Real fans following real teams. No Messironaldo fans from Asia wearing man U / Liverpool half and half scarves. Cool grounds such as Loftus Road. Chaotic results. I'll kinda.miss.it and I kinda won't. Tho I suspect we'll be back in 12 months time!

There's no way Whelan would sanction that. No mention of community, diversity or charity foundation. And a whiff of masculinity about the post. Someone is gonna be in biiiig trouble.

A CEO and FD would have to sign off. They can't be unaccountable in this. An over promoted academy coach surely doesn't have final say on hundreds of millions. And if Whelan simply signs off his deals without checking, more fool her. The club adminstration is riddled with incompetence, pettiness, unprofessionalism and subservience, inside out

Cap'n Tom. Anyone for a spa day? https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-beds-bucks-herts-68896140

Without any irony, it's one of my favourite buildings in Leicester. It's disgusting, bizarre and totally unique. And in an awful area. But fascinating. Needs a preservation order. Give it 20 years and the thing will be iconic Edit; the 'arthouse' cinema was the Cinecentre ....think it showed mainstream films and soft porn

If we needed a draw I'd kinda get it. It's as good as done. But a draw -even two draws - are more or less useless due to a quirk of the points and goal difference. This thread is poor poor taste

Elephant Man. He's basically our own peaky blinder. Cloth cap, mask, brown cape and ideally a walking cane.. Tribute to Leicester's finest

Exactly this. It's not a revenue generator. It's a control thing.

Walker peters and that french winger will skin us alive down our left if the manager persists with Faes or Doyle at LCB. On the basis the manager will not change, which as we all know he will not, I'd go; Ricky to be play the inverted role but at left. Hamza to play the Wilf role,.but deeper protecting the right. JJ to play ahead of,.I'm.afraid,.Coady as Faes simply won't be dropped. JJ right with Hamza and Faes left with Ricky. Daka up front for his press

Wtf?

Yep, little wins that. Could be the difference

But there rules are there to mitigate this. Offsides have always had a benefit of doubt. As a.kid, the defensive team had the benefit but there was a rule change,.in, at a guess, the 90s that changed the benefit of doubt to the attacker. Meaning the 'goal' yesterday would've correctly stood had it have been gjven

I prefer it. I prefer an honest bad refereeing decision (including the Leeds and Ipswich debacles) to VAR pawing over fractional decisions. VAR robbed football of one of its iconic moments yesterday over a decision in millimetres. Nothing is worth that.

It's a great post. And yet another example of logic defying business insanity that pervades down there. It's almost like a competition to see who can come up with the most numbskull idea

As per, the hideous Agnew will be frothing out of his undernourished horse head that April starts wouldn't be needed if Derby Northants and County weren't around.

I've not thought this comment through tbh, but is there an argument for EVERYONE to BUY a card and stump up the £25, on the basis it's clearly something the club don't want us to do? I can imagine the club having eggs at the thought of 22k cards each week actually ending up in the hands of (in the club's view) unvetted undesirables

I can't lose with Tigers. If they win I'm pleased. If they lose it's funny.

Not sure it's greed. It's about control. As others have said, whatever this crackpot administration wants, the opposite is probably right. I'll pay. And as the poster says above, it's us who's the mug punter.

£75 extra if you have have any measurable level of testosterone and/or a functioning prostate

Sort of. The rules,.up until VAR anyway,.allowed for an element of doubt. And where there was, the officials are licensed to favour the attacker. In that respect, if that law is still in existence, the goal was incorrectly disallowed

Tigers lost too 👍