Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content
GLC

FIFA 16

By GLC, in Music and Gaming

Recommended Posts

glenny_fox

glenny_fox

Posted
Posted

does anybody know if EA took out the disaster of min/max pricing off of UT. that completely ruined it last year.

 

I was playing the NFL version not long ago and their version of UT is 100 times better than ours.

Ashley

Ashley

Posted
Posted

does anybody know if EA took out the disaster of min/max pricing off of UT. that completely ruined it last year.

I was playing the NFL version not long ago and their version of UT is 100 times better than ours.

Did it ruin it because you buy coins by any chance??

glenny_fox

glenny_fox

Posted
Posted

Did it ruin it because you buy coins by any chance??

 

Nope, can't say I've ever done that.

 

It completely took the fun out of bargain hunting on the auction house. it effectively destroyed the whole point of a auction house of 'buy cheap sell high'.

CharlieCharles

CharlieCharles

Posted
Posted

Did it ruin it because you buy coins by any chance??

Wagers were the main thing imo.

Wagers were massively popular, would it not be possible to have an add on for say £1.99, which lets players over 18 do them? or would the game have to change its rating? im sure it would be an incredibly popular decision and EA will get more money, which as we know they like very much.

CharlieCharles

CharlieCharles

Posted
Posted

I'd love them to put in a pink slip feature. Both teams nominate an equal rated player. winner takes all.

I dont see where the problem lies neither. The people who play the game desperately want it back and it will be mutually beneficial to EA due to extra revenue. Reports show that EA made $200M of FIFA 13 Ultimate Team alone. This shows how much extra they could make.

LAprice_

LAprice_

Posted
Posted

The ratings issue isn't as simple as saying "Leicester are underrated and the majority are correct". 

 

If all the Leicester ratings were upgraded to match similar players from other clubs, the other clubs would probably just upgrade their players further. In the end, the ratings will be inflated so heavily that hundreds of mediocre players will become 90 rated or above. I know that sounds like an extreme scenario but it does happen. 

 

In my opinion, with all the new statistics and data on offer today, I would have thought it possible to make an actual realistic database that marks the statistics for ALL players equally. Fifa is due a big revamp and all player ratings should be scrapped and reworked. 

 

This isn't just about the Leicester ratings. You can't just upgrade a whole squad. The whole system needs changing. 

 

It will be interesting to see how the women's teams are rated because, unlike the men's, they don't have any previously inflated ratings to sustain. 

Ashley

Ashley

Posted
Posted

The ratings issue isn't as simple as saying "Leicester are underrated and the majority are correct".

If all the Leicester ratings were upgraded to match similar players from other clubs, the other clubs would probably just upgrade their players further. In the end, the ratings will be inflated so heavily that hundreds of mediocre players will become 90 rated or above. I know that sounds like an extreme scenario but it does happen.

In my opinion, with all the new statistics and data on offer today, I would have thought it possible to make an actual realistic database that marks the statistics for ALL players equally. Fifa is due a big revamp and all player ratings should be scrapped and reworked.

This isn't just about the Leicester ratings. You can't just upgrade a whole squad. The whole system needs changing.

It will be interesting to see how the women's teams are rated because, unlike the men's, they don't have any previously inflated ratings to sustain.

I like your take on this. Seriously though anyone who wants to join the editing team.. If there are positions available join? Or even data reviewer

joedawg

joedawg

Posted
Posted

I like your take on this. Seriously though anyone who wants to join the editing team.. If there are positions available join? Or even data reviewer

What at EA?
1884Fox

1884Fox

Posted
Posted

I'd love to edit the players. Id created Vardy after we signed him and got the exact same overall as he had next FIFA. Just saying

lgfualol

lgfualol

Posted
Posted

Deeney has higher strength than Lukaku, arteta is higher rated than henderson, these ratings are genuinely a joke this season

The Arsenal fan in charge of their ratings has gone a bit over the top. Gibbs 80 rated, Campbell 76.

Mike Williamson is rated 73 somehow.

Bournemouth have Gradel at 79. Matt Ritchie is 74. I dont remember any of our players getting higher than 72 the year we got promoted?

Ashley

Ashley

Posted
Posted

Do you have to be over 18 Ash?

 

I think so yes, will ask the question.

 

The Arsenal fan in charge of their ratings has gone a bit over the top. Gibbs 80 rated, Campbell 76.

Mike Williamson is rated 73 somehow.

Bournemouth have Gradel at 79. Matt Ritchie is 74. I dont remember any of our players getting higher than 72 the year we got promoted?

 

 

Gradel has come from France so Data Editors there would of edited him.

AKCJ

AKCJ

Posted
Posted

Price ranges are a brilliant addition but poorly maintained.

 

I packed a pink Doumbia but couldn't sell him at min for a good 3 weeks until they lowered it.

lgfualol

lgfualol

Posted
Posted

Just going to stick to career mode. And as per usual, never let Schlupp leave.

Schlupp was in my fifa 15 team at age 30 with 0 apps in about 5 years because he was rated so low. He never moaned.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...