Sol thewall Bamba Posted 6 September 2015 Posted 6 September 2015 Just seen Bournemouth's ratings against ours. Simon Francis overall rating the same as Vardy, Ritchie higher than Mahrez. Arter higher than King and Drinkwater. Fantastic.
Lcfclad2013 Posted 6 September 2015 Posted 6 September 2015 Just seen Bournemouth's ratings against ours. Simon Francis overall rating the same as Vardy, Ritchie higher than Mahrez. Arter higher than King and Drinkwater. Fantastic. Same with watford they have around 11 golds.
Brainy Posted 6 September 2015 Posted 6 September 2015 I enjoy making random silver/bronze teams, and given I don't spend much on packs and pretty much never have more than 30k to spend, the price range thing is shit because most people just put the maximum buy now price on the player.
Dylster Posted 6 September 2015 Posted 6 September 2015 We are a 4 star team now though. And I agree with some of the others that some other teams players are overrated compared to ours.
EverybodyDannsNow Posted 6 September 2015 Posted 6 September 2015 Our ratings compared to other Premier League teams are absolutely laughable. Vardy 71 is completely bizare when you compare it to the likes of Cameron Jerome who is 75. Lee Cattermole as 77 also left me wondering if I had been watching a different sport for the last 5 years. And Janmaat also rated 77... I don't even know where to start with that one. We never seem to get the rub of the green with Fifa ratings but this year the people in charge have made some completely ridiculous decisions. For the first time in years I refuse to buy the game.
Dylster Posted 6 September 2015 Posted 6 September 2015 Watford and Norwich are both 4 star teams as well. Plus Watford's attack and defense are rated higher than ours.
Swiper Posted 7 September 2015 Posted 7 September 2015 We are a 4 star team now though. And I agree with some of the others that some other teams players are overrated compared to ours. I thought we were 3.5*?
J.Lisemore Posted 7 September 2015 Posted 7 September 2015 Matt Ritchie higher rating than Mahrez lol This is a catastrophe, honestly isn't even funny. Mahrez is on a completely different level to Matt Ritchie.
1884Fox Posted 7 September 2015 Posted 7 September 2015 My mate who's a Leeds fan told me that Sol Bamba was 74! Laughable how badly we've been rated
VLC86 Posted 7 September 2015 Posted 7 September 2015 This is a catastrophe, honestly isn't even funny. Mahrez is on a completely different level to Matt Ritchie. Have you called the police?
hairmetalgamer Posted 7 September 2015 Posted 7 September 2015 Nugent and Wood are the same rating as Vardy
Ashley Posted 7 September 2015 Posted 7 September 2015 My mate who's a Leeds fan told me that Sol Bamba was 74! Laughable how badly we've been rated Again transfered from Italy he will go down in rating should he need it.
Dylster Posted 7 September 2015 Posted 7 September 2015 I thought we were 3.5*? 4 star now apparently, saw it on a YouTube video.
Lcfclad2013 Posted 7 September 2015 Posted 7 September 2015 Again transfered from Italy he will go down in rating should he need it. Seen leeds a few times easily there best defender by a mile and seems to have more composure nowadays.
EnderbyFox Posted 7 September 2015 Posted 7 September 2015 Just seen Bournemouth's ratings against ours. Simon Francis overall rating the same as Vardy, Ritchie higher than Mahrez. Arter higher than King and Drinkwater. Fantastic. That's hilarious
Finnegan Posted 7 September 2015 Posted 7 September 2015 No offence to Ashley but I'd love to see Thracian doing our ratings. Schlupp a gold 95, King 93, Chouhdary probably a 78 rare, Chilwell on there as a 75.
Dan Posted 7 September 2015 Posted 7 September 2015 I'd rather we weren't four star, then again we get screwed over on matchups anyway. How on earth do we get paired with Ajax? They're a mile ahead of us in every position near enough. I agree with whoever said Ashley's doing his job properly but others aren't. Mahrez 73 though is laughable, regardless of overalls I'm 99% sure if he played for Liverpool or Tottenham he would be 80 at least. Fact is I think most of us have outgrown the target market of this game. It's aimed at kids and glory hunters. That's why I prefer FM.
Dan Posted 7 September 2015 Posted 7 September 2015 Jamie Vardy 71 Gary Hooper 74 Conor Wickham 73 Ricky van Wolfwinkel - 73 Fabio Borini 76 Cameron Jerome 75 That is absolutely astonishing. Vardy was poor for a lot of last season but he is not four worse than Jerome, he just isn't. Just skimmed through some of the others. Gradel 6 better than Mahrez? Football is subjective but that is just wrong and anyone who disagrees has a completely different take on the game to me. He's nowhere near as good. There needs to be a total overhaul of the stats on 17. I know I'm biased but these are nothing short of pathetic.
EnderbyFox Posted 7 September 2015 Posted 7 September 2015 Jamie Vardy 71 Gary Hooper 74 Conor Wickham 73 Ricky van Wolfwinkel - 73 Fabio Borini 76 Cameron Jerome 75 Jamie Vardy 71 Ross McCormack 74 Stuani 74 Abel Hernandez 74 Darren Bent 74 Kenwyne Jones 74. Good job overalls don't mean much
hairmetalgamer Posted 7 September 2015 Posted 7 September 2015 Maybe they are overly strict with the Leicester ratings so it doesn't seem like David Rutter is being bias?
Dan Posted 7 September 2015 Posted 7 September 2015 The irony is though there is bias involving Leicester. We are criminally under-rated in some areas here.
The Horse's Mouth Posted 7 September 2015 Posted 7 September 2015 It is bizarre how Inler managed to get an 80 tbf. Kante should be higher, but it's really not just us. So many bizarre ratings across the board.
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.