Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content
 Share
boots60

Keith Vaz

By boots60, in General Chat

Recommended Posts

WarehamFox

WarehamFox

Posted
Posted (edited)

"Our Keith" is like Hillary, you commit crime after crime and when you get caught, it's sorry I didn't really claim for that (again) (have gay s?x and ask for drugs)! Or I never did any of this! I think people are starting to wake up to these charlatan's! As in America and our Brexit vote, the votes of the non charlatan do count too. The rest of Europe may follow whats happened? But people like Keith will soon be called to justice.  And as a "criminal" the sooner the better! 

Edited by WarehamFox
Missing "
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Countryfox

Countryfox

Posted
Posted
7 hours ago, WarehamFox said:

Ha ha, I was quoting  boots60's comment about "our Keef". It's just above my post, if you look closely you might just see it. :rolleyes: He deffo ain't my Keef either!

Not aimed at you matey I just like slagging the little ...      oh I'm off again !!   :)

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • 1 month later...
Manwell Pablo

Manwell Pablo

Posted
Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, Swan Lesta said:

 

 

I'm not sure there ever was a criminal case to answer.

 

He ca do what he wants in his spare time - its his activities in his job that concern me.

 

 

 

I'm all for live and let live but I've got to say, I'm not sure a married MP (with children) should be banging Romanian Rent boys whilst smacked up on coke. He's supposed to be representing his (very religious)  constituency lol  theres an example to be set. 

Edited by Manwell Pablo
  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Nick

Nick

Posted
Posted
23 minutes ago, Manwell Pablo said:

 

I'm all for live and let live but I've got to say, I'm not sure a married MP (with children) should be banging Romanian Rent boys whilst smacked up on coke. He's supposed to be representing his (very religious)  constituency lol  theres an example to be set. 

Maybe - there's the whole 7 principles of public life thing, which I'm pretty sure he might be in contravention of on the work side (lol) however I'm honestly not bothered about him using recreational drugs and sleeping with consenting adults providing it doesn't prevent him from doing his job. I certainly am not of the opinion that sex and alleged drug use should be a criminal matter.

 

So while he's at it - (quite literally) he should have some interesting views on religious doctrines, the drug debate and prostitution. (Which he now won't contribute to the review on the latter, sadly.) What in my mind would make him unfit to do his job and unethical hypocritical leader of people would be if he didn't then back drug decriminalisation, working to change conditions for sex workers and reviewing the role, purpose and interpretations of religion in the 21st century.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Mike Oxlong

Mike Oxlong

Posted
Posted

Yeah but having Vaz chairing a committee looking at the merits of decriminalising prostitution and illicit drugs is a bit like having the pope head up an inquiry making recommendations on abortion and same sex relationships

 

Keith had undeclared interests which compromised his position 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Nick

Nick

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, Mike Oxlong said:

Yeah but having Vaz chairing a committee looking at the merits of decriminalising prostitution and illicit drugs is a bit like having the pope head up an inquiry making recommendations on abortion and same sex relationships

 

Keith had undeclared interests which compromised his position 

 

 

 

Or it informed his position - depends on your viewpoint! 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Nick

Nick

Posted
Posted
28 minutes ago, Mike Oxlong said:

Yeah but surely a person with a more open mind would be required to head up the inquiry

It'd be brilliant if only that were true - I suspect he'd have had a more open mind and knowledge base as a result of his first err hand experience.

 

My point in all this is that for me, he only becomes dishonest when he does one thing in private and preaches another in public.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Dr The Singh

Dr The Singh

Posted
Posted
54 minutes ago, MPH said:

Just been on the news that he is being moved to a less important role and more out of the limelight.

 

 

He's going to head up a committee on developing and discovering talented young boys in youth football

I thought he might head up a committee on washing machines?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
  • 5 months later...

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...