GazzinderFox Posted 20 January 2017 Share Posted 20 January 2017 4 minutes ago, Barky said: Stop telling people what they can and can't do otherwise I'll be voting for Mr Bean in 2019. Well if he is the candidate that best represents your particular brand of politics... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Barky Posted 20 January 2017 Share Posted 20 January 2017 1 minute ago, GazzinderFox said: Well if he is the candidate that best represents your particular brand of politics... Mr Bean is just as articulate as Donald Trump to be fair. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
bovril Posted 20 January 2017 Share Posted 20 January 2017 https://mobile.twitter.com/JahovasWitniss/status/822502060717314048/video/1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jon the Hat Posted 20 January 2017 Share Posted 20 January 2017 1 hour ago, MONreborn said: You really are a right wing extremist aren't you matt. Why would you vote for trump over hilary (given the chance)? Hillary was an awful awful candidate. Even this idiot beat her. Think about that wont you. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest MattP Posted 20 January 2017 Share Posted 20 January 2017 1 hour ago, MONreborn said: You really are a right wing extremist aren't you matt. Why would you vote for trump over hilary (given the chance)? Extremist? How so? I actually said on the day of the election I wouldn't have voted for either of them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Strokes Posted 20 January 2017 Share Posted 20 January 2017 Im dying, Matts a Nazi for not liking Hillary more than trump. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Great Boos Up Posted 20 January 2017 Share Posted 20 January 2017 Well, he's been given the nuclear codes by now and I think all countries are still there. perhaps he's not a lunatic and just an eccentric rich and powerful man. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest MattP Posted 20 January 2017 Share Posted 20 January 2017 12 minutes ago, Strokes said: Im dying, Matts a Nazi for not liking Hillary more than trump. And all whilst the anti-Trump (which obviously makes them kind, gentle non extremists) protestors are setting fire to Washington. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest FriendlyRam Posted 20 January 2017 Share Posted 20 January 2017 Setting cars on fire now... complete buffoons. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Parafox Posted 20 January 2017 Share Posted 20 January 2017 4 hours ago, Carl the Llama said: Looks like the Jews are ok at least. America needs the Jewish support like we need oxygen. No President, no matter how radical, would alienate that money Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Parafox Posted 20 January 2017 Share Posted 20 January 2017 43 minutes ago, MattP said: Extremist? How so? I actually said on the day of the election I wouldn't have voted for either of them. Then how can you express support or opposition if you wouldn't have voted? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Parafox Posted 20 January 2017 Share Posted 20 January 2017 49 minutes ago, Jon the Hat said: Hillary was an awful awful candidate. Even this idiot beat her. Think about that wont you. As someone else said ages ago, 100 million (or whatever the population is) and they came up with those two? Where were the credible candidates? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest MattP Posted 20 January 2017 Share Posted 20 January 2017 1 minute ago, Parafox said: Then how can you express support or opposition if you wouldn't have voted? Because we don't live in North Korea and I'm allowed an opinion on things. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
leicsmac Posted 20 January 2017 Share Posted 20 January 2017 Yeah, Matt's no frigging fascist, for goodness sake. Neither, I think, is Trump for that matter - it's various elements within the Repub legislature and some bits of its support that flirt with that, though drawing the elements along religious as well as racial lines. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Parafox Posted 20 January 2017 Share Posted 20 January 2017 1 minute ago, MattP said: Because we don't live in North Korea and I'm allowed an opinion on things. haha. yes but if you lived in North America and didn't vote you'd have no right of reply to criticise either one. Same as living here, having a vote, not exercising that right, then moaning about the result of the election. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest MattP Posted 20 January 2017 Share Posted 20 January 2017 20 minutes ago, FriendlyRam said: Setting cars on fire now... complete buffoons. Trump has only been in a few hours and the car making industry is already thriving. 3 minutes ago, Parafox said: haha. yes but if you lived in North America and didn't vote you'd have no right of reply to criticise either one. Same as living here, having a vote, not exercising that right, then moaning about the result of the election. I agree with you if you oppose something that has been elected and you couldn't be bothered to vote, that is farcical. I think people are entitled to criticise though if they feel both options they had on offer were substandard. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
leicsmac Posted 20 January 2017 Share Posted 20 January 2017 I'll go on record with this now: the stance of this incoming administration on both climate change and pollution are the most potentially damaging parts of its platform. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WiFoxes Posted 20 January 2017 Share Posted 20 January 2017 Just now, leicsmac said: I'll go on record with this now: the stance of this incoming administration on both climate change and pollution are the most potentially damaging parts of its platform. And yet that topic wasn't mentioned once during any of the presidential debates Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
leicsmac Posted 20 January 2017 Share Posted 20 January 2017 2 minutes ago, WiFoxes said: And yet that topic wasn't mentioned once during any of the presidential debates Yep, because it was considered secondary to economic issues. Thing is, you've got to have a reasonably stable, pollution-free environment in order to HAVE an economy. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WiFoxes Posted 20 January 2017 Share Posted 20 January 2017 It's hard over here when one of the two major political parties denies that climate change is actually happening, and doesn't care about pollution. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Parafox Posted 20 January 2017 Share Posted 20 January 2017 1 minute ago, MattP said: Trump has only been in a few hours and the car making industry is already thriving. I agree with you if you oppose something that has been elected and you couldn't be bothered to vote, that is farcical. I think people are entitled to criticise though if they feel both options they had on offer were substandard. Actually I agree with your second point, but on reading your initial response saying you wouldn't have voted, I thought, that undermines the point you were making. I have opinions on Trump and Clinton, mostly from what I read and hear about them both. I really think the world is in an even more unstable place now than if Clinton had won. At least we had some kind of handle on her background. Trump is an unknown quantity in terms of political history. knowledge and experience. He knows nothing. He's not even been through law school, which seems a prerequisite to become a politician in the US. Has he even reached the Senate? He definitely comes across as a maverick, shoot from the lip type of guy with absolutely no political experience. He gobs off and uses his wealth to gain friends and, ergo, power Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WiFoxes Posted 20 January 2017 Share Posted 20 January 2017 1 minute ago, Parafox said: Has he even reached the Senate? To the best of my belief this is his first publicly-elected position. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Barky Posted 20 January 2017 Share Posted 20 January 2017 12 minutes ago, leicsmac said: I'll go on record with this now: the stance of this incoming administration on both climate change and pollution are the most potentially damaging parts of its platform. What aren't they going to do on climate change that you think they should do? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Parafox Posted 20 January 2017 Share Posted 20 January 2017 3 minutes ago, WiFoxes said: To the best of my belief this is his first publicly-elected position. That's what I thought, which makes his election even more concerning. It's like electing Katie Hopkins to PM. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Carl the Llama Posted 20 January 2017 Share Posted 20 January 2017 I love the rioters: It's like they're worried that Tump's going to destroy the country so they've set out to stop him by destroying the country. Fight potential fire with actual fire. Genius. 1 hour ago, bovril said: https://mobile.twitter.com/JahovasWitniss/status/822502060717314048/video/1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.