Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content
Aus Fox

Today is in Fact the Day!

Recommended Posts

Posted

News just in - LCFC recruitment to begin real transfer negotiations on Wednesday ???

Guest Chocolate Teapot
Posted

Ranieri sounded v confident of a CB in the presser.

Posted
56 minutes ago, Ric Flair said:

Hahahaa I thought by continually waffling on about it for 24 hours you'd all become numb to it when it dawns upon us we're going in to a  relegation battle, the last 16 of Europe and the FA Cup with this current crop of piss ants.

Current crop of piss ants who are still in the Premier League, still in Europe and still in the Fa Cup.

Posted
9 minutes ago, Stevosevic said:

Shambles of a season.

 

Forget our weak group in Europe, its all been pathetic from start to finish.

 

 

Slightly agree with this really. This year should have been all about us cementing our place as a top 10 club that could challenge top 6 when any of the top clubs slipped up. 

We should have bought in the best players in the league that the top 6 didn't want (Keane, sigurdsson etc) and the only signing we could  possibly put in that category is Slimani. We have been way too complacent on how good last year was and are now not much better off than the start of last year

Posted

Such over reaction from most of those here on FT.

 

Far too much focus is put on the Jan window, hyped up by Sky, and the fans buy into it.

 

Yes, We need decent cover (and eventual replacement) for one of our centre backs, and we could definitely do with a no10. But both issues can still be resolved internally, with the options we've got, to a good enough standard to achieve this seasons goal. (Which realistically is stay up, without too much panic, i.e. never to drop into the bottom 4). 

 

Take out last seasons amazing achievements. For which I am privileged to have witnessed, and that is about where City should be happy to be. 14-16th.

 

Far too much hysteria. Keep calm. The players will hopefully be focused on what they need to do. Us fans should be too. 

 

If you stand back and look at the transfers which go through in Jan, it is rare when a teams fortunes are completely transformed by those transfers.

Guest the fox
Posted
1 hour ago, Koke said:

:/

 

 

 

 

images (18).jpg

 

Edit: We should sign Albert then :ph34r:

Posted
1 minute ago, FoxinNotts said:

 

Yes, We need decent cover (and eventual replacement) for one of our centre backs, and we could definitely do with a no10. But both issues can still be resolved internally, with the options we've got, to a good enough standard to achieve this seasons goal. (Which realistically is stay up, without too much panic, i.e. never to drop into the bottom 4). 

 

If if you stand back and look at the transfers which go through in Jan, it is rare when a teams fortunes are completely transformed by those transfers.

1) who are the in house replacements?

 

2) Huth was a master stroke two seasons back.

Posted
5 minutes ago, FoxinNotts said:

Such over reaction from most of those here on FT.

 

Far too much focus is put on the Jan window, hyped up by Sky, and the fans buy into it.

 

Yes, We need decent cover (and eventual replacement) for one of our centre backs, and we could definitely do with a no10. But both issues can still be resolved internally, with the options we've got, to a good enough standard to achieve this seasons goal. (Which realistically is stay up, without too much panic, i.e. never to drop into the bottom 4). 

 

Take out last seasons amazing achievements. For which I am privileged to have witnessed, and that is about where City should be happy to be. 14-16th.

 

Far too much hysteria. Keep calm. The players will hopefully be focused on what they need to do. Us fans should be too. 

 

If you stand back and look at the transfers which go through in Jan, it is rare when a teams fortunes are completely transformed by those transfers.

Why should we only hope for that?

 

Stoke have been in the top 10 four straight years

Posted

1) Kaputska was used quite regularly as a no10 for Poland. I'd give that a go (I'm not saying Claudio will btw, but he should)

 

Or

 

although it has had mixed (at best) results so far, Mahrez should be an ideal candidate for that role. This would also free up a wing spot. For which we have a few options.

 

2) Yes, I agree. A good example. But these examples are not all that frequent. 

Posted
8 minutes ago, FoxinNotts said:

Such over reaction from most of those here on FT.

 

Far too much focus is put on the Jan window, hyped up by Sky, and the fans buy into it.

 

Yes, We need decent cover (and eventual replacement) for one of our centre backs, and we could definitely do with a no10. But both issues can still be resolved internally, with the options we've got, to a good enough standard to achieve this seasons goal. (Which realistically is stay up, without too much panic, i.e. never to drop into the bottom 4). 

 

Take out last seasons amazing achievements. For which I am privileged to have witnessed, and that is about where City should be happy to be. 14-16th.

 

Far too much hysteria. Keep calm. The players will hopefully be focused on what they need to do. Us fans should be too. 

 

If you stand back and look at the transfers which go through in Jan, it is rare when a teams fortunes are completely transformed by those transfers.

Palace brought in Dann and Ledley (& possibly Puncheon)  and transformed their season from nailed on relegation material to relative comfort 

Posted
9 minutes ago, the fox said:

 

images (18).jpg

 

Edit: We should sign Albert then :ph34r:

CR's post-match response to his latest formation: "imagination is more important than knowledge".

Guest the fox
Posted
1 minute ago, bovril said:

CR's post-match response to his latest formation: "imagination is more important than knowledge".

Tell him to imagine relegation, because that will definitely give him some much needed knowledge.

Posted
2 minutes ago, FoxinNotts said:

1) Kaputska was used quite regularly as a no10 for Poland. I'd give that a go (I'm not saying Claudio will btw, but he should)

 

Or

 

although it has had mixed (at best) results so far, Mahrez should be an ideal candidate for that role. This would also free up a wing spot. For which we have a few options.

 

2) Yes, I agree. A good example. But these examples are not all that frequent. 

Agree with you on the number 10s (id actually love to see mahrez there), but meant centre back more specifically to that point .

 

No doubt that January buying is risky business, but because we didn't do enough in the summer we have no choice.

Posted
5 minutes ago, Stevosevic said:

Why should we only hope for that?

 

Stoke have been in the top 10 four straight years

I'm not curbing anyone's 'hopes'. 

I'd love us to get top 10. 

Realistically tho, that's where we are going to be. Lower half of the table.

Posted
5 minutes ago, surrifox said:

Palace brought in Dann and Ledley (& possibly Puncheon)  and transformed their season from nailed on relegation material to relative comfort 

And another good example is Sunderland.

 

 

 

Posted
9 hours ago, FoxinNotts said:

Such over reaction from most of those here on FT.

 

Far too much focus is put on the Jan window, hyped up by Sky, and the fans buy into it.

 

Yes, We need decent cover (and eventual replacement) for one of our centre backs, and we could definitely do with a no10. But both issues can still be resolved internally, with the options we've got, to a good enough standard to achieve this seasons goal. (Which realistically is stay up, without too much panic, i.e. never to drop into the bottom 4). 

 

Take out last seasons amazing achievements. For which I am privileged to have witnessed, and that is about where City should be happy to be. 14-16th.

 

Far too much hysteria. Keep calm. The players will hopefully be focused on what they need to do. Us fans should be too. 

 

If you stand back and look at the transfers which go through in Jan, it is rare when a teams fortunes are completely transformed by those transfers.

Can't see us getting more than 5 points out of the next 7 PL matches, which would put us on 26 points in 29 matches. Would that be enough to to keep us out of the bottom 4?

Posted
1 minute ago, WigstonWanderer said:

Can't see us getting more than 5 points out of the next 7 PL matches, which would put us on 26 points in 29 matches. Would that be enough to to keep us out of the bottom 4?

Well, we were on 19 points with 29 played a few seasons back which was the point we kicked off our great escape. 

 

I think based on current points totals of the bottom 3/4 this year - being a little lower - 26 points would probably keep around 2/3 points adrift of the relegation zone. That said any of them put a run together - which I've a feeling they will - and we could be in trouble. 

 

Swansea look like they're starting to get their sh1t together, playing some decent stuff and Palace' losing run cant last forever with a manager that knows how to grind out results. I'd say we require more than 5 from the next 7 to avoid being pulled right down into the sh1t pit. 

Posted
16 hours ago, FoxinNotts said:

Such over reaction from most of those here on FT.

 

Far too much focus is put on the Jan window, hyped up by Sky, and the fans buy into it.

 

Yes, We need decent cover (and eventual replacement) for one of our centre backs, and we could definitely do with a no10....

Most on here are citing the summer window as the real lost opportunity, when we could surely have got in Keane and Siggurdson, for example. Can see no excuse for missing out on those.

 

This is merely compounded by the undignified scramble for almost anybody who vaguely fits the bill in this Jan window.

 

Posted
16 hours ago, FoxinNotts said:

I'm not curbing anyone's 'hopes'. 

I'd love us to get top 10. 

Realistically tho, that's where we are going to be. Lower half of the table.

Yeh, because our club is fvcking up and underachieving.

 

It wouldn't be realistic if they were doing their jobs properly.

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...