Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content
Always Next Year

Mike Dean Stuffed Us Yet Again.

By Always Next Year, in Leicester City Forum

Recommended Posts

daddylonglegs

daddylonglegs

Posted
Posted

The defending for goals 1 3 and 4 was absolutely atrocious. Mahrez hugely at fault for their second too.

 

You don't win football matches when you put yourselves in a positions we put ourselves in tonight - regardless if you score three times or not 

ktfox59

ktfox59

Posted
Posted

Just a small point. Where the hell did 2 minutes added time come from at the end of the 1st half? No injury or sub. Usually only 3 in 2nd half of games with subs and injury

Jonezy

Jonezy

Posted
Posted

Stop blaming refs for us not being able to cope with standard set pieces. We invited pressure and conceded set pieces, which we could not defend. Well played Arsenal, not so well played Leicester.

Trav Le Bleu

Trav Le Bleu

Posted
Posted
48 minutes ago, kristianity77 said:

As bad a decision as it was from Dean, that passage of play would never of happened had Shakey not had a brain freeze with the James substitution.

The James substitution wasn't the problem, it was the Okazaki one.

peterborofox

peterborofox

Posted
Posted

People who say we're being harsh on Shakey it's not the first time he has ****ed up

 

Remember when he brought Musa on at West Ham lol nearly cost us there too 

Guest ttfn

Guest ttfn

Posted
Posted
18 minutes ago, Trav Le Bleu said:

The James substitution wasn't the problem, it was the Okazaki one.

Okazaki can't do 90 minutes the way he runs around. 

 

The fact we have no like-for-like replacement for him is disappointing but it would probably be a bit of a luxury in an 18 Man match day squad.

Trav Le Bleu

Trav Le Bleu

Posted
Posted
Just now, ttfn said:

Okazaki can't do 90 minutes the way he runs around. 

 

 

No, but it should have been like for like. Bring on Iheanacho.

Guest ttfn

Guest ttfn

Posted
Posted
Just now, Trav Le Bleu said:

No, but it should have been like for like. Bring on Iheanacho.

I thought we had them where we wanted them with the 4-5-1. Wouldn't have been my choice but I thought it was doing the job nicely. Certainly didn't feel like a goal was inevitable.

Trav Le Bleu

Trav Le Bleu

Posted
Posted
Just now, ttfn said:

I thought we had them where we wanted them with the 4-5-1. Wouldn't have been my choice but I thought it was doing the job nicely. Certainly didn't feel like a goal was inevitable.

Seriously? I could barely watch and thought it was only a matter of time.

 

peterborofox

peterborofox

Posted
Posted
15 minutes ago, crisp packet said:

Since when can you take a free kick for offside? In your opposition half lol?

led to the second arsenal goal.

JOKE!

That rule came in a while ago. Can take it from where the player receives the ball. 

Guest ttfn

Guest ttfn

Posted
Posted
18 minutes ago, Trav Le Bleu said:

Seriously? I could barely watch and thought it was only a matter of time.

 

Yeah I didn't get the sense they were going to score, unlike when it got to 3-3 at which point the 4th felt inevitable.

 

I see where you're coming from though - you're damned if you do and damned if you don't.

Dan

Dan

Posted
Posted

Mike Dean sums up everything English football has become. Low on quality, there to manufacture talking points. Atrocious referee.

brendanmcgovern1988

brendanmcgovern1988

Posted
Posted

Ndidi was never a peno! he was less than a metre away running to the ball! Even arsenal fans i was with said it wasn't! its one you shout for but when you see it on tele later you realise the ref got it right....if thats a pen there'd be about 3 every game

sdb

sdb

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, daddylonglegs said:

The defending for goals 1 3 and 4 was absolutely atrocious. Mahrez hugely at fault for their second too.

 

You don't win football matches when you put yourselves in a positions we put ourselves in tonight - regardless if you score three times or not 

Partly at fault for the first too. James was pulled way out of position to cover him early on in the move. 

act smiley

act smiley

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, Lewdtenant said:

Come on now.. some people here are straight embarrassing..  https://streamwoop.tv/replay/Arsenal-1-2-Leicester-Ndidi-handball-penalty-claim- Tell me this is not a stonewall penalty. 

It looks worse because he raises his hands after the ball has hit him. Before, he's just got his hands up slightly in a position that's normal if you're trying to stop quickly. It's pretty borderline.

Albert

Albert

Posted
Posted

To be fair to him he was almost 10 yards away and was clearly obstructed by the huge c*ck swinging from his forehead.....

 

How is it even possible to miss such an easy decision? 

 

 

eunmac

eunmac

Posted
Posted
21 minutes ago, Dan LCFC said:

This is not a stonewall penalty.

 

Next.

Agree. To our lovely Arsenal guests reading our forum - have any you lot even read the handball rules? (N'didi was ball to hand = not handball (see below). Ozil, hand to ball = handball.)

For reference: 

 

Quote

 

HANDLING THE BALL
Handling the ball involves a deliberate act of a player making contact with the ball with the hand or arm.
The following must be considered:

  • the movement of the hand towards the ball (not the ball towards the hand)
  • the distance between the opponent and the ball (unexpected ball)
  • the position of the hand does not necessarily mean that there is an offence

 

  •  

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...