Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)
40 minutes ago, brownboy93 said:

Spot on. we have a very stuck up, highly judgemental fanbase dont we just :D ..think as a replacement for mendy, soumare & hamza he is very much an upgrade on them, Underrated Quality passer, good tackling, nimble & press-resistant (like mendy) & good at dribbling and breaking through the lines and adds more bite, i'm sure kokcu will be Youri's replacement so chill ya ass's but we need depth aswell. think he'd do fine here 

 

Our fans moan about us signing deadwood players or already having them in the squad and then being unable to get rid of them.

 

This is a picture book example of that. If, and god forbid, we sign Winks, we're going to be stuck with a traffic cone wearing our shirt. He's worse than useless, he got outclassed in the blimming groupstages of the UECL by teams nobody ever heard of before. I'd rather we keep Hamza around if it means this pillock doesn't come anywhere close to Seagrave.

Edited by MadsEmil
  • Like 1
Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, roblcfc84 said:

I get he’s not the most exciting signing. But some of the comments on here are bordering on unhinged. He’s a good premier league player in his position. 

But he doesn't really improve the first team which I think is what we're after this window

 

Edit:

He's probably not that bad. If we can swap him out for praet and Hamza we've done ok.

Edited by Grebfromgrebland
  • Like 1
Posted
5 minutes ago, urban.spaceman said:

 

:dunno:

Exciting if true, granted whoever Josh Wilson is is not entirely credible but I can see us prioritising these two players. 

 

Surely we'd be looking at upwards of £55-60m for them both though? 

 

 

Posted
7 minutes ago, urban.spaceman said:

 

:dunno:

This guy keeps popping up. He's only been on Twitter for a few months, but acts like he's Fabrizio Romano. He seems to focus a lot on LCFC business. 

 

Who is realistically feeding information to a total unknown? I can just imagine some spotty teenager from Aylestone with a vivid imagination and too much time on their hands making this up. 

  • Like 3
Posted
9 minutes ago, RoboFox said:

This guy keeps popping up. He's only been on Twitter for a few months, but acts like he's Fabrizio Romano. He seems to focus a lot on LCFC business. 

 

Who is realistically feeding information to a total unknown? I can just imagine some spotty teenager from Aylestone with a vivid imagination and too much time on their hands making this up. 

Then he has f**k-all to do this window.

Posted
3 minutes ago, moore_94 said:

The “ITK’s” are scrapping lol

 

(Both are retweets of Josh Wilson posts)

 

 

****in hell 🤣

 

Being a Leicester fan is hard work sometimes. 

Posted
On 30/05/2022 at 09:32, Lambert09 said:

harry winks is available for £20m. I must admit, he very much seems like a Brendan midfielder 

FFS I knew it!

Posted
24 minutes ago, RoboFox said:

This guy keeps popping up. He's only been on Twitter for a few months, but acts like he's Fabrizio Romano. He seems to focus a lot on LCFC business. 

 

Who is realistically feeding information to a total unknown? I can just imagine some spotty teenager from Aylestone with a vivid imagination and too much time on their hands making this up. 

Don't pay attention to whatever that Josh Wilson bloke says. He's already deleted tweets of his that have turned out to be wrong and now his "exclusive" Bourigeaud "scoop" (that he stole from Owynn and rehashed as his own) has been disproved by Tanner.

  • Like 1
Posted
6 minutes ago, MadsEmil said:

Don't pay attention to whatever that Josh Wilson bloke says. He's already deleted tweets of his that have turned out to be wrong and now his "exclusive" Bourigeaud "scoop" (that he stole from Owynn and rehashed as his own) has been disproved by Tanner.

Precisely.  Everything he tweets is a rehash of something already vaguely reported with no further detail.   Definitely not ITK. 

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)

I find it depressingly cringy that these people are so desperate for clout from bored supporters on football Twitter that they'll just spout any old shit claiming credibility for a bit of attention.  

 

These lads need a fvcking hobby.

 

Edited by RoboFox
  • Like 1
Posted
50 minutes ago, RoboFox said:

I find it depressingly cringy that these people are so desperate for clout from bored supporters on football Twitter that they'll just spout any old shit claiming credibility for a bit of attention.  

 

These lads need a fvcking hobby.

 

They seem to have one! But seriously, what weird satisfaction do they get from this sort of thing? I mean, if there was some way of monetizing it, I would understand (hell, I might even try it myself), but do they lurk on this forum and rub one off every time someone mentions them?

 

Of course, my favorite was a few years back when indykaila got into a Twitter war with Rebekah Vardy when he said Vards was off and she mocked him.

 

The worst are the ones that clone a legitimate journalist -- usually Rob Dorsett, because he strangely isn't a blue check on Twitter -- and just tweet absolute BS.

 

They really must suffer from mental illness.

Posted
1 hour ago, MarriedaLeicesterGirl said:

They seem to have one! But seriously, what weird satisfaction do they get from this sort of thing? I mean, if there was some way of monetizing it, I would understand (hell, I might even try it myself), but do they lurk on this forum and rub one off every time someone mentions them?

 

Of course, my favorite was a few years back when indykaila got into a Twitter war with Rebekah Vardy when he said Vards was off and she mocked him.

 

The worst are the ones that clone a legitimate journalist -- usually Rob Dorsett, because he strangely isn't a blue check on Twitter -- and just tweet absolute BS.

 

They really must suffer from mental illness.

If it's a mental illness to chat shit about football then we are all in trouble. This must be the local asylum then.:D

  • Like 1
Posted

I’m seeing Winks mentioned a lot on socials. Absolutely not. Thats an Everton type signing, not a Leicester type one.

  • Like 1
Posted
9 minutes ago, Bordersfox said:

What's everyone panicking about we've got loadsamoney to spunk this window!  Sleep easy everyone, sleep easy.  

 

Screenshot_20220708-131156_1.png.904a4fc1b842b4189c8cd2b2cee1fd32.png

New contracts for everyone! :scarf:

  • Haha 1
Posted
35 minutes ago, Bordersfox said:

What's everyone panicking about we've got loadsamoney to spunk this window!  Sleep easy everyone, sleep easy.  

 

Screenshot_20220708-131156_1.png.904a4fc1b842b4189c8cd2b2cee1fd32.png

When every player is back,  Seagrave will more crowded than Hong Kong.  We really do need to shift some unmovable objects, but this is akin to selling Porn Mags at a Church Bazar.

  • Haha 1
Posted
2 minutes ago, mozartfox said:

When every player is back,  Seagrave will more crowded than Hong Kong.  We really do need to shift some unmovable objects, but this is akin to selling Porn Mags at a Church Bazar.

This 'bloated squad' theory, isn't actually correct though, is it? We have 27 senior players. Bearing in mind the ideal is 24-25 players, hardly that concerning.

Posted
Just now, FoxinNotts said:

This 'bloated squad' theory, isn't actually correct though, is it? We have 27 senior players. Bearing in mind the ideal is 24-25 players, hardly that concerning.

Squad size is maximum of 25 I thought, so it’s not ideal

Posted (edited)
3 minutes ago, Dahnsouff said:

Squad size is maximum of 25 I thought, so it’s not ideal

But not a real concern. If it was my job to trim the squad by just two, net, during the transfer window I wouldn't be losing sleep. Unlike my concerns in my current job, in the real world

Edited by FoxinNotts
  • Like 2
Posted
35 minutes ago, FoxinNotts said:

This 'bloated squad' theory, isn't actually correct though, is it? We have 27 senior players. Bearing in mind the ideal is 24-25 players, hardly that concerning.

So that would be two players being paid to train. Regardless of who they were, we would probably be looking at paying over 100k a wee for players not even registered in the squad. 

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...