MadsEmil Posted 7 July 2022 Posted 7 July 2022 (edited) 40 minutes ago, brownboy93 said: Spot on. we have a very stuck up, highly judgemental fanbase dont we just ..think as a replacement for mendy, soumare & hamza he is very much an upgrade on them, Underrated Quality passer, good tackling, nimble & press-resistant (like mendy) & good at dribbling and breaking through the lines and adds more bite, i'm sure kokcu will be Youri's replacement so chill ya ass's but we need depth aswell. think he'd do fine here Our fans moan about us signing deadwood players or already having them in the squad and then being unable to get rid of them. This is a picture book example of that. If, and god forbid, we sign Winks, we're going to be stuck with a traffic cone wearing our shirt. He's worse than useless, he got outclassed in the blimming groupstages of the UECL by teams nobody ever heard of before. I'd rather we keep Hamza around if it means this pillock doesn't come anywhere close to Seagrave. Edited 7 July 2022 by MadsEmil 1
Grebfromgrebland Posted 7 July 2022 Posted 7 July 2022 (edited) 1 hour ago, roblcfc84 said: I get he’s not the most exciting signing. But some of the comments on here are bordering on unhinged. He’s a good premier league player in his position. But he doesn't really improve the first team which I think is what we're after this window Edit: He's probably not that bad. If we can swap him out for praet and Hamza we've done ok. Edited 7 July 2022 by Grebfromgrebland 1
-sodapop Posted 7 July 2022 Posted 7 July 2022 2 minutes ago, urban.spaceman said: bit much to relocate the entire club to the netherlands - away fans will be raging 2
Jabfox Posted 7 July 2022 Posted 7 July 2022 5 minutes ago, urban.spaceman said: Exciting if true, granted whoever Josh Wilson is is not entirely credible but I can see us prioritising these two players. Surely we'd be looking at upwards of £55-60m for them both though?
RoboFox Posted 7 July 2022 Posted 7 July 2022 7 minutes ago, urban.spaceman said: This guy keeps popping up. He's only been on Twitter for a few months, but acts like he's Fabrizio Romano. He seems to focus a lot on LCFC business. Who is realistically feeding information to a total unknown? I can just imagine some spotty teenager from Aylestone with a vivid imagination and too much time on their hands making this up. 3
moore_94 Posted 7 July 2022 Posted 7 July 2022 The “ITK’s” are scrapping (Both are retweets of Josh Wilson posts) 3
mozartfox Posted 7 July 2022 Posted 7 July 2022 9 minutes ago, RoboFox said: This guy keeps popping up. He's only been on Twitter for a few months, but acts like he's Fabrizio Romano. He seems to focus a lot on LCFC business. Who is realistically feeding information to a total unknown? I can just imagine some spotty teenager from Aylestone with a vivid imagination and too much time on their hands making this up. Then he has f**k-all to do this window.
Jabfox Posted 7 July 2022 Posted 7 July 2022 3 minutes ago, moore_94 said: The “ITK’s” are scrapping (Both are retweets of Josh Wilson posts) ****in hell 🤣 Being a Leicester fan is hard work sometimes.
Lambert09 Posted 7 July 2022 Posted 7 July 2022 On 30/05/2022 at 09:32, Lambert09 said: harry winks is available for £20m. I must admit, he very much seems like a Brendan midfielder FFS I knew it!
MadsEmil Posted 7 July 2022 Posted 7 July 2022 24 minutes ago, RoboFox said: This guy keeps popping up. He's only been on Twitter for a few months, but acts like he's Fabrizio Romano. He seems to focus a lot on LCFC business. Who is realistically feeding information to a total unknown? I can just imagine some spotty teenager from Aylestone with a vivid imagination and too much time on their hands making this up. Don't pay attention to whatever that Josh Wilson bloke says. He's already deleted tweets of his that have turned out to be wrong and now his "exclusive" Bourigeaud "scoop" (that he stole from Owynn and rehashed as his own) has been disproved by Tanner. 1
Bordersfox Posted 7 July 2022 Posted 7 July 2022 6 minutes ago, MadsEmil said: Don't pay attention to whatever that Josh Wilson bloke says. He's already deleted tweets of his that have turned out to be wrong and now his "exclusive" Bourigeaud "scoop" (that he stole from Owynn and rehashed as his own) has been disproved by Tanner. Precisely. Everything he tweets is a rehash of something already vaguely reported with no further detail. Definitely not ITK. 1
RoboFox Posted 7 July 2022 Posted 7 July 2022 (edited) I find it depressingly cringy that these people are so desperate for clout from bored supporters on football Twitter that they'll just spout any old shit claiming credibility for a bit of attention. These lads need a fvcking hobby. Edited 7 July 2022 by RoboFox 1
MarriedaLeicesterGirl Posted 7 July 2022 Posted 7 July 2022 50 minutes ago, RoboFox said: I find it depressingly cringy that these people are so desperate for clout from bored supporters on football Twitter that they'll just spout any old shit claiming credibility for a bit of attention. These lads need a fvcking hobby. They seem to have one! But seriously, what weird satisfaction do they get from this sort of thing? I mean, if there was some way of monetizing it, I would understand (hell, I might even try it myself), but do they lurk on this forum and rub one off every time someone mentions them? Of course, my favorite was a few years back when indykaila got into a Twitter war with Rebekah Vardy when he said Vards was off and she mocked him. The worst are the ones that clone a legitimate journalist -- usually Rob Dorsett, because he strangely isn't a blue check on Twitter -- and just tweet absolute BS. They really must suffer from mental illness.
PAPA LAZAROU Posted 7 July 2022 Posted 7 July 2022 1 hour ago, MarriedaLeicesterGirl said: They seem to have one! But seriously, what weird satisfaction do they get from this sort of thing? I mean, if there was some way of monetizing it, I would understand (hell, I might even try it myself), but do they lurk on this forum and rub one off every time someone mentions them? Of course, my favorite was a few years back when indykaila got into a Twitter war with Rebekah Vardy when he said Vards was off and she mocked him. The worst are the ones that clone a legitimate journalist -- usually Rob Dorsett, because he strangely isn't a blue check on Twitter -- and just tweet absolute BS. They really must suffer from mental illness. If it's a mental illness to chat shit about football then we are all in trouble. This must be the local asylum then. 1
Dames Posted 7 July 2022 Posted 7 July 2022 I’m seeing Winks mentioned a lot on socials. Absolutely not. Thats an Everton type signing, not a Leicester type one. 1
Bordersfox Posted 8 July 2022 Posted 8 July 2022 What's everyone panicking about we've got loadsamoney to spunk this window! Sleep easy everyone, sleep easy.
Dahnsouff Posted 8 July 2022 Posted 8 July 2022 9 minutes ago, Bordersfox said: What's everyone panicking about we've got loadsamoney to spunk this window! Sleep easy everyone, sleep easy. New contracts for everyone! 1
mozartfox Posted 8 July 2022 Posted 8 July 2022 35 minutes ago, Bordersfox said: What's everyone panicking about we've got loadsamoney to spunk this window! Sleep easy everyone, sleep easy. When every player is back, Seagrave will more crowded than Hong Kong. We really do need to shift some unmovable objects, but this is akin to selling Porn Mags at a Church Bazar. 1
FoxinNotts Posted 8 July 2022 Posted 8 July 2022 2 minutes ago, mozartfox said: When every player is back, Seagrave will more crowded than Hong Kong. We really do need to shift some unmovable objects, but this is akin to selling Porn Mags at a Church Bazar. This 'bloated squad' theory, isn't actually correct though, is it? We have 27 senior players. Bearing in mind the ideal is 24-25 players, hardly that concerning.
Dahnsouff Posted 8 July 2022 Posted 8 July 2022 Just now, FoxinNotts said: This 'bloated squad' theory, isn't actually correct though, is it? We have 27 senior players. Bearing in mind the ideal is 24-25 players, hardly that concerning. Squad size is maximum of 25 I thought, so it’s not ideal
FoxinNotts Posted 8 July 2022 Posted 8 July 2022 (edited) 3 minutes ago, Dahnsouff said: Squad size is maximum of 25 I thought, so it’s not ideal But not a real concern. If it was my job to trim the squad by just two, net, during the transfer window I wouldn't be losing sleep. Unlike my concerns in my current job, in the real world Edited 8 July 2022 by FoxinNotts 2
Popular Post Dames Posted 8 July 2022 Popular Post Posted 8 July 2022 54 minutes ago, Bordersfox said: What's everyone panicking about we've got loadsamoney to spunk this window! Sleep easy everyone, sleep easy. LCFCHQ are about as trustworthy as a drink from Bill Cosby. 4 7
Scotch Posted 8 July 2022 Posted 8 July 2022 35 minutes ago, FoxinNotts said: This 'bloated squad' theory, isn't actually correct though, is it? We have 27 senior players. Bearing in mind the ideal is 24-25 players, hardly that concerning. So that would be two players being paid to train. Regardless of who they were, we would probably be looking at paying over 100k a wee for players not even registered in the squad.
Recommended Posts