st albans fox Posted 31 July 2022 Posted 31 July 2022 Wes is going to be one of the top CB’s for a decade. Of course the big clubs are looking at him. One of them has to jump first - but the player won’t want to be a bench warmer at one of them. maybe one of them could put down a £40m deposit 😄
Lionator Posted 31 July 2022 Posted 31 July 2022 If he waits it out a year then he’ll have far better options than Chelsea. Given he’s just signed a new contract for five years (that’s meaty), surely you’re looking in excess of £100-£120m?
StanSP Posted 31 July 2022 Posted 31 July 2022 Man City, PSG also linked along with Chelsea again this morning. Sell him for less than Maguire went for and it'd be a travesty. 1
Pliskin Posted 31 July 2022 Posted 31 July 2022 Just now, StanSP said: Man City, PSG also linked along with Chelsea again this morning. Sell him for less than Maguire went for and it'd be a travesty. We won’t be selling him at all. Not yet. 1
Babylon Posted 31 July 2022 Posted 31 July 2022 1 minute ago, StanSP said: Man City, PSG also linked along with Chelsea again this morning. Fingers crossed, might drive the price up. Couldn't see Chelsea going much more than £70-£75m, if that. 1
ronnup Posted 31 July 2022 Posted 31 July 2022 This makes me feel sick, robbed of him last season now this. Just let us enjoy him for one more season ffs 1
fox_up_north Posted 31 July 2022 Posted 31 July 2022 Get a bidding war going between Chelsea, PSG and Man City - I wouldn't be opposed to him going this year but we're leaving it late to replace him
Babylon Posted 31 July 2022 Posted 31 July 2022 3 minutes ago, Pliskin said: We won’t be selling him at all. Not yet. I really wouldn't be so sure, if we get a mad offer then he goes. Simple as that. As I said in another thread, we're stumbling into a problem next summer and being able to do some trading now will alleviate that bit. 2
Bluearmyfox28 Posted 31 July 2022 Posted 31 July 2022 2 minutes ago, fleshdaddy said: Would be stupid on his behalf to be “against joining Chelsea” does not mean in the slightest he wants it nor that we are interested in selling.
st albans fox Posted 31 July 2022 Posted 31 July 2022 4 minutes ago, StanSP said: Man City, PSG also linked along with Chelsea again this morning. Sell him for less than Maguire went for and it'd be a travesty. He’d be perfect for Man City not sure about psg - he just got married - does anyone know if she’s local ?
Guest Chocolate Teapot Posted 31 July 2022 Posted 31 July 2022 7 minutes ago, Babylon said: I really wouldn't be so sure, if we get a mad offer then he goes. Simple as that. As I said in another thread, we're stumbling into a problem next summer and being able to do some trading now will alleviate that bit. We haven't inserted a release clause so there's no chance we will be able to sell him.
MarriedaLeicesterGirl Posted 31 July 2022 Posted 31 July 2022 1 minute ago, Bluearmyfox28 said: Would be stupid on his behalf to be “against joining Chelsea” does not mean in the slightest he wants it nor that we are interested in selling. Of course he's not "against" joining Chelsea (or ManCity or PSG)! Why would he be? It would be massive money and regular CL football. But I can't see him pushing for a move just a couple of months after signing a new contract. This is one of those "club is relaxed" moments: Any move will be on Leicester's terms (this year and next), but I expect they will want to get a replacement lined up before hand in any case. Fofana is a generational talent, and won an FA Cup with us, and the club can hold out for whatever he is worth. A good season this year, and he will break a record in the summer. 3
StanSP Posted 31 July 2022 Posted 31 July 2022 3 minutes ago, st albans fox said: He’d be perfect for Man City not sure about psg - he just got married - does anyone know if she’s local ? Nope. Cyrinesbr on Instagram. She's French I think.
coolhandfox Posted 31 July 2022 Posted 31 July 2022 A nice bidding war between PSG, Man City and Chelsea could see him go for a record fee for a defender. To honestly love him, but that gets us a good RW, CM and a CB. Next summer would be better. 2
Popular Post Babylon Posted 31 July 2022 Popular Post Posted 31 July 2022 3 minutes ago, Chocolate Teapot said: We haven't inserted a release clause so there's no chance we will be able to sell him. What are you on about. 6
st albans fox Posted 31 July 2022 Posted 31 July 2022 (edited) 5 minutes ago, StanSP said: Nope. Cyrinesbr on Instagram. She's French I think. In which case PSG would be a good decisIon for him ….. won’t be popular call amongst his Marseille mates but a career is a career. Edited 31 July 2022 by st albans fox
Babylon Posted 31 July 2022 Posted 31 July 2022 1 minute ago, coolhandfox said: Next summer would be better. Would it? Considering we're already potentially losing Soyuncu, Tielemans, Amartey, Perez, Vardy, Kasper, Evans, Mendy, Choudhury, Bertrand and would have Ndidi, Maddison, Iheanacho, Vestergard, Praet, Thomas and Albrighton with just one year left. We've got a considerable amount of squad reshaping to do on the horizon, and a season of standing still isn't ideal. 2
Guest Chocolate Teapot Posted 31 July 2022 Posted 31 July 2022 3 minutes ago, Babylon said: What are you on about. Was asking you the same question about that thread you made....
MarriedaLeicesterGirl Posted 31 July 2022 Posted 31 July 2022 1 minute ago, coolhandfox said: A nice bidding war between PSG, Man City and Chelsea could see him go for a record fee for a defender. To honestly love him, but that gets us a good RW, CM and a CB. Next summer would be better. If it's a bidding war, Chelsea is gonna lose. If we did lose him this year, I'd rather it be for obnoxious PSG oil money as opposed to obnoxious ManCity oil money, for all the obvious reasons. Although with Chelsea, it would sweeten our pursuit of a couple of their players, they'd never match the Gulf money this summer. 1
taupe Posted 31 July 2022 Posted 31 July 2022 We'd get a shed load for him (no Chelsea pun intended) which would be good... I'd only feel ok with a silly huge sum. Preference is he doesn't go but a serious cash injection would have its uses.
st albans fox Posted 31 July 2022 Posted 31 July 2022 3 minutes ago, MarriedaLeicesterGirl said: If it's a bidding war, Chelsea is gonna lose. If we did lose him this year, I'd rather it be for obnoxious PSG oil money as opposed to obnoxious ManCity oil money, for all the obvious reasons. Although with Chelsea, it would sweeten our pursuit of a couple of their players, they'd never match the Gulf money this summer. I’d have Kimpembe down the KP for the song alone …….don’t rate him as a player though …..
Babylon Posted 31 July 2022 Posted 31 July 2022 3 minutes ago, Chocolate Teapot said: Was asking you the same question about that thread you made.... Yeah it's sooooo hard to comprehend that a) we know from a good source the club refused to deal in release clauses post Kante and Vardy and b) Actually considering them again might allow for a better negotiation tactic for renewals. But then, I expect nothing less.
st albans fox Posted 31 July 2022 Posted 31 July 2022 Just now, taupe said: We'd get a shed load for him (no Chelsea pun intended) which would be good... I'd only feel ok with a silly huge sum. Preference is he doesn't go but a serious cash injection would have its uses. I think we will have budgeted for a large sale of wes either next summer or the one following….. it would just pull the cashflow forward. The issue for us is replacements and whether him leaving this summer means we end making another vestergaard type disaster as a consequence 1
Recommended Posts