Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content
Sly

Wesley Fofana - He is no more - finished - forgotten.

Recommended Posts

Posted

New power negotiation tactic, Fofana + Bertrand + Choudury + Praet + Vestergaard + Perez for Colwill + Ziyech - Chelsea pay their wages for the duration of their first contract

 

Posted
10 minutes ago, kingkisnorbo said:

Gallagher is one of the most exciting players I’ve seen for years. Would move heaven and earth to make him part of any potential deal. 

No chance…. he had a good first half to the campaign and a woeful second once his form dropped. He’s a good player but nowhere near as good as people rate him atm 

  • Like 1
Posted

Colwill + Gallagher and 60m would be really good business for us. 
 

CHO is on too high wages to justify. 

Posted
2 minutes ago, Phenom said:

GallagherDB8B3863-C5C1-47A4-93B9-1706D8DFCD66.thumb.jpeg.53e31081514107b11a873424ce4a3ca3.jpeg

Yeah fair play I was looking at purely league based stats in which he is within 1% of both Tielemans and Maddison. He evidently isn’t a poor passer of the ball. 

Posted
1 minute ago, Lambert09 said:

No chance…. he had a good first half to the campaign and a woeful second once his form dropped. He’s a good player but nowhere near as good as people rate him atm 

I disagree.

Posted

Thing is though, swapping two players in doesn’t help us solve our issues. Because we still need more players to go.

 

Ultimately I don’t think we sell him yet. He will stay at least one more season. 

Posted
2 minutes ago, Pliskin said:

Thing is though, swapping two players in doesn’t help us solve our issues. Because we still need more players to go.

 

Ultimately I don’t think we sell him yet. He will stay at least one more season. 

Two players plus a load of money helps a lot. 

Posted
1 minute ago, Babylon said:

Two players plus a load of money helps a lot. 

 

1 minute ago, Babylon said:

Two players plus a load of money helps a lot. 

yeah but we would have signed colwill anyway

Posted
2 minutes ago, Pliskin said:

It will in terms of quality in. What about bodies out? 

You can have as many players as you want. We’d have the money to pay them. 
 

Plus.. most of those we want out will be gone on loan come the end of the window, if not permanently.

Posted

We’ve got to set a deadline of only a week or two, but if they offer the £80/85m then that is huge and there’s not much we can do about it. 

Posted

The problem we have got is that who is going to replace him? I don’t trust anyone at the club to make the right choice on that right now 

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Posted

It’s hardly like selling a fantastic prospect would be outside our normal way of operating is it? Could see it, but the cost, structure and other miscellaneous financial pieces would need to be right, even before we get to the rare lesser spotted swap deal.

Posted

Does it say in the article what players Chelsea would be willing to part with? Wouldn’t surprise me if there’s truth to this CHO rumour + the obvious target of Colwill

Posted
1 minute ago, Micky said:

He's not going. Close the thread and stop being gullible and believing all that's written in the press. 

Hes downed tools before to get a move, dont think he wont do the same again

Posted
3 minutes ago, Micky said:

He's not going. Close the thread and stop being gullible and believing all that's written in the press. 

It’s Ornstein not Cockshaw this time though, smoke/fire is relevant this time

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...