Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
7 minutes ago, ClaphamFox said:

Fascinating interview with Guy Branston in the latest episode. Key talking points: 

*Rudkin is one of the best DoFs in the business and we're very lucky to have him

*RVN was brought in for the long term and should be allowed to carry on next season

*Our fans don't understand the huge gap between the Championship and the PL

*If we try to build the team around academy players next season we'll get battered every week

 

I anticipate a bit of debate on this thread as more people hear it....

A few takeaways from that as I resist the kneejerk reaction by pissing myself laughing.

 

1) If Rudkin really is that good, then how has the club got so much wrong? Is it all Top's fault? Do we need a new scouting team or to invest in a better data analysis setup to ensure we don't keep signing the wrong managers and players? Something is rotten. If it isn't Rudkin, it isn't Whelan and it isn't Top, then what is it? 

 

2) This flies in the face of the evidence we're seeing. The team has no identity, organisation or self-belief. RVN has achieved the impossible and been objectively worse than Cooper, who had been comfortably the worst appointment the club had made since Sousa. It would also be extremely unusual for a manager who had five months to save a club from relegation and failed to try to get them back up again. What makes RVN special and exempt from that? Because none of us have seen it.

 

3) I don't think anyone expected us to get back to our 18-22 levels this season. Everyone knew that survival was the goal and would have been happy with 17th before building a base to improve. What everyone is annoyed by is the poor signings, lack of fight, lack of identity and seeming lack of any intent to improve on the pitch. What precisely would constitute a good understanding of the gap between PL and EFL? 

 

4) Again, this misrepresents what has been said. We want to see the players who we know are good enough for the Championship being brought in. Nobody is advocating for 15-year-old Monga to play every week or for an average age of 18 in the squad. What's being called for is those players like Nelson and Alves, who have done well at teams who (respectfully) will likely be nowhere near us next season, to get their place ahead of players who have lost the right to be considered ahead of them. If it's a choice between Faes and Nelson or a choice between Ayew and Alves, we're going to want the latter in both scenarios because those players are the future and will have resale value that'll be pure profit if we don't go up, or an opportunity for them to come up with us and build a career if we do. Every other season under King Power has seen extensive contributions by academy products who were ready for the step-up, King, KDH, Barnes, Chilwell to name a few, with this season being an outlier in not having any playing most weeks. Is this a coincidence? How many academy products is too many? If none of the academy players are good enough for regular Championship football when we have a much-vaunted Champions League standard setup in Seagrave, what exactly is going wrong? That leads us back to Question 1, by the way.

 

So yes, happy to engage with Branston's analysis, but I fear it asks more questions than it answers.

Posted (edited)
8 minutes ago, Finnaldo said:

I, for one, am absolutely shocked a football agent thinks Rudkin is the best thing since sliced bread.

It's a bit like when you see kids in school excited that their very strict teacher is off sick and the class is being taught by the cover staff who can't control them. 

Edited by Bilo
Posted
17 minutes ago, Finnaldo said:

I, for one, am absolutely shocked a football agent thinks Rudkin is the best thing since sliced bread.

Not only that, but a football agent that's previously been given a job by him :D

 

  • Like 3
Posted
46 minutes ago, TheGoldenGod said:

I simply can't accept that this Guy thinks some of the youngsters we have "aren't at the level". I think it's clear some are and aren't worse than what we have currently.

They quite clearly are.

 

Evans and Monga are ready on a sparing basis in the cups and getting odd minutes to start with next season, while I don't see much reason why Nelson and Alves can't at least be in regular matchday squads. Nelson has been class for Oxford and I'm looking forward to seeing him next season. 

Posted

 

12 minutes ago, samlcfc1 said:

Stopped taking much notice of Guy when he said Kasey was 6ft4

 

3 minutes ago, BrummieFOX said:

So called Guy Branston. 

Got himself in a pickle there didn’t he.

  • Like 1
  • Haha 2
Posted

Turned it off. Clearly has a problem articulating himself and came on with hot takes to appear different and unique. 

 

As for the comments about our ‘so called’ Director of Football. I think Guy’s previous roles at the club and respect of Jon says everything. 

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Posted
18 minutes ago, Soar Fox said:

Interesting that he thinks Sammy Braybrooke is a league one/league two player. 
 

A lot of people on here highly rate him. 

I noticed that, but my impression was that he was talking about where Braybrooke could get a loan move to now rather than his ceiling in the future. 

  • Like 3
Posted

Anticipate this being an unpopular opinion.
 

Reading through some of the comments, I find it a bit odd that people turn a podcast off simply because they hear an opinion they don’t like.

 

Whoever this Guy is, he’s come through our academy, played professional football, and has worked for the club in developing young players. More knowledge of the industry than most on here I’d assume. 
 

Also has Louis Page in his agency I think, so clearly still has an eye on us. 
 

If someone who’s spent their whole career bringing through young players says playing 6 boys straight from the academy in a game won’t work (not only for the club, but for the development of the players), he’s probably right. As supposed to some FT poster who’s probably never been involved in professional football suggesting we should shove 6 of them straight into the starting 11 for the remaining games.

 

Even if you think he’s saying some of what he’s saying for personal PR reasons (which probably is true) there would still be elements of truth/genuine opinion in what he’s saying. Not worth turning it off imo.

  • Like 4
Posted
11 minutes ago, niyaminski said:

Anticipate this being an unpopular opinion.
 

Reading through some of the comments, I find it a bit odd that people turn a podcast off simply because they hear an opinion they don’t like.

 

Whoever this Guy is, he’s come through our academy, played professional football, and has worked for the club in developing young players. More knowledge of the industry than most on here I’d assume. 
 

Also has Louis Page in his agency I think, so clearly still has an eye on us. 
 

If someone who’s spent their whole career bringing through young players says playing 6 boys straight from the academy in a game won’t work (not only for the club, but for the development of the players), he’s probably right. As supposed to some FT poster who’s probably never been involved in professional football suggesting we should shove 6 of them straight into the starting 11 for the remaining games.

 

Even if you think he’s saying some of what he’s saying for personal PR reasons (which probably is true) there would still be elements of truth/genuine opinion in what he’s saying. Not worth turning it off imo.

Because an already disillusioned fan base listening to someone who’s been around during the club’s demise waxing lyrical about the DoF who’s about to relegate us for the second time in as many years isn’t really worth my time.

 

This isn’t someone offering an alternative view of Israel/Palestine, it’s a guy who can’t organise his thoughts towing the party line for a club in the absolute shit. 

Posted (edited)

Did I just mishear him or did he say unfortunately we might see more academy players playing in the championship next season? Surely I’ve misheard that?! 
 

Or did he just mean unfortunately we’d be in the championship 

Edited by Noahfence

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...