Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
On 28/10/2023 at 18:15, StanSP said:

What is Hwang doing lol

He’s barely touched the player who was already falling over, another ridiculous decision.

Posted

 

That is disgusting.

 

Necastle lad threw himself to the ground, Wolves player touched the ball first.

 

 

  • Like 1
Posted
On 28/10/2023 at 18:18, Mark said:

He’s barely touched the player who was already falling over, another ridiculous decision.

There's ever so slight contact. Schar milks it. 

 

On replay it's not a penalty. 

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)
1 minute ago, HybridFox said:

I'm sorry that's a load of rubbish. Not only is that not a penalty but at the very least the referee should be made to have another look and decide for himself. Ridiculous

Agreed. But there's a stigma now that going to the monitor equals refs got it wrong. It needs stamping out. 

Edited by The Bear
  • Like 1
Posted

The cynic in me thinks that now Newcastle are minted they’re getting the rub of the green more. 
 

Their first goal was the sort that you do see ruled out, the Newcastle player both backs into the keeper and pushes the Wolves defender into the keeper. Might have been soft, but it was a hell of a lot more of a foul than the penalty was. 
 

But both decisions go their way…

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)
24 minutes ago, Super_horns said:

Sounds like one of those where VAR will go with whatever decision is made .

Yes because they are too spineless to ask the ref to have another look. 

Edited by The Bear
  • Like 1
Posted
7 minutes ago, Super_horns said:

Sounds like one of those where VAR will go with whatever decision is made .

we may as well go with every offside the linesman gives if thats the case

Posted (edited)
3 minutes ago, UniFox21 said:

"Clear and obvious error" is the worst. 

It’s just an excuse to give the decision they want. Deliberately vague wording they can use as justification either way. 

Edited by reporterpenguin
  • Like 2
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...