Guest Posted 13 August 2023 Posted 13 August 2023 Outrageous ball in for the opener from Madderzzzzzzzz
Buzzard Posted 13 August 2023 Posted 13 August 2023 11 mins stoppage time. Spurs score within that stoppage time. Ref blows up on 11:03. I don't get it? Are we already at the stage where refs are giving up playing the extra time? Either play the proper time or just don't bother. Still making it up as they go along. 1
whoareyaaa Posted 13 August 2023 Posted 13 August 2023 (edited) 4 minutes ago, Buzzard said: 11 mins stoppage time. Spurs score within that stoppage time. Ref blows up on 11:03. I don't get it? Are we already at the stage where refs are giving up playing the extra time? Either play the proper time or just don't bother. Still making it up as they go along. Just another benefit for the big teams, mentally and physically If Tottenham was winning 2-1 I really doubt we see 11 mins Edited 13 August 2023 by whoareyaaa
tom27111 Posted 13 August 2023 Posted 13 August 2023 5 minutes ago, whoareyaaa said: Just another benefit for the big teams, mentally and physically If Tottenham was winning 2-1 I really doubt we see 11 mins Why?
whoareyaaa Posted 13 August 2023 Posted 13 August 2023 3 minutes ago, tom27111 said: Why? Because the bigger teams are better physically (fitness) and mentally (the bigger teams usually pile on pressure in the dying minutes now they have 10 minutes of that. Plus they can bring on better players etc.
tom27111 Posted 13 August 2023 Posted 13 August 2023 Just now, whoareyaaa said: Because the bigger teams are better physically (fitness) and mentally (the bigger teams usually pile on pressure in the dying minutes now they have 10 minutes of that. Plus they can bring on better players etc. That's not really much of an argument. But why do you doubt that amount of time would be added on if Spurs were winning? Arsenal played 8 minutes yesterday when they were winning. 1
whoareyaaa Posted 13 August 2023 Posted 13 August 2023 (edited) 2 minutes ago, tom27111 said: That's not really much of an argument. But why do you doubt that amount of time would be added on if Spurs were winning? Arsenal played 8 minutes yesterday when they were winning. Just seems a bit excessive and its to early to tell yet if there will be advantage for the bigger teams but that's my view. Edited 13 August 2023 by whoareyaaa
StanSP Posted 13 August 2023 Posted 13 August 2023 Maddison fortunate that wasn't called a foul. Could have been a 2nd booking.
The Bear Posted 13 August 2023 Posted 13 August 2023 Vicario looks absolutely dog muck. Should be a penalty there. I don't care the ball has gone. 1
spacemunky Posted 13 August 2023 Posted 13 August 2023 Interesting lineup for Liverpool, with Mac Allister as the only actual midfielder.
tom27111 Posted 13 August 2023 Posted 13 August 2023 The size of the Chelsea squad and all the money they've spent, they still start Connor Gallagher
Fox92 Posted 13 August 2023 Posted 13 August 2023 Great to watch a big game without Martin Tyler’s voice. 2
OntarioFox Posted 13 August 2023 Posted 13 August 2023 Brentford drew their opening fixture 2-2 last season - and look what happened to the team they played... ... we can only hope. 3
Fox92 Posted 13 August 2023 Posted 13 August 2023 Can’t work out if Liverpool are good or if Chelsea are shocking. Either way it’s well deserved for Liverpool.
StanSP Posted 13 August 2023 Posted 13 August 2023 Chelsea go to sleep They all just gave up as soon as Salah was through.
Fox92 Posted 13 August 2023 Posted 13 August 2023 Liverpool looking good. Great ball from Trent though maybe offside.
foxes_rule1978 Posted 13 August 2023 Posted 13 August 2023 The amount of money spent on that chelsea team
Recommended Posts