ClaphamFox Posted 10 July 2023 Posted 10 July 2023 Just now, Chelmofox said: The 8 mill also get the wages off the books. Getting somebody's wages off the books is not 'cashing in'. And Iheancho's wages will have been reduced along with everybody else's.
Chelmofox Posted 10 July 2023 Posted 10 July 2023 (edited) 11 minutes ago, ClaphamFox said: Getting somebody's wages off the books is not 'cashing in'. And Iheancho's wages will have been reduced along with everybody else's. The 8 mill is funds to re invest. Listen, we aren't selling Kels for some crazy profit. He's a cult hero for a reason, and the epitome of the player whos loved because he doesn't play much. 1 year means out, no matter what. It has to be a red line. Who bloody knows what is the right salaries are but it was reported he was on about 90k a week. Even with the reduction thats huge. Edited 10 July 2023 by Chelmofox 1
Jack1993 Posted 10 July 2023 Posted 10 July 2023 Getting Iheanacho for 8 million is an absolute steal and if that's the price we are negotiating at then I'm surprised that there's not loads of clubs lined up to match or beat that kind of offer. Guaranteed Premier League goals and assists and he barely ever started games. There's 14 to 16 squads that he would improve in that league, for that price even as a bigger club I'd buy him and start him in every League cup & F.A cup game (I realise he might turn on offer like that down personally).
Chelmofox Posted 10 July 2023 Posted 10 July 2023 6 minutes ago, Jack1993 said: Getting Iheanacho for 8 million is an absolute steal and if that's the price we are negotiating at then I'm surprised that there's not loads of clubs lined up to match or beat that kind of offer. Guaranteed Premier League goals and assists and he barely ever started games. There's 14 to 16 squads that he would improve in that league, for that price even as a bigger club I'd buy him and start him in every League cup & F.A cup game (I realise he might turn on offer like that down personally). There is a reason for it. There are much better options out there.
Jack1993 Posted 10 July 2023 Posted 10 July 2023 3 minutes ago, Chelmofox said: There is a reason for it. There are much better options out there. I'd agree there's loads of players with potential to get better numbers than him, but for that price and the fact that he's proven that he's capable, it's a steal. 1
Clever Fox Posted 10 July 2023 Posted 10 July 2023 For 8 million I'd sooner keep him for this season. He's a quality finisher who dare I say it has got under BR. His movement is much better outside the box which has added another dimension to his game. 8 milion is an insult of an offer.
Ted Maul Posted 10 July 2023 Posted 10 July 2023 We aren't getting anyone remotely close to his level for £8m. 2
Jimbo Posted 10 July 2023 Posted 10 July 2023 23 minutes ago, Chelmofox said: There is a reason for it. There are much better options out there. For £8million? There really isn't
whoareyaaa Posted 10 July 2023 Posted 10 July 2023 54 minutes ago, Chelmofox said: The 8 mill also get the wages off the books. Only to re sign another striker for more money and be on a similar wage brilliant
Chelmofox Posted 10 July 2023 Posted 10 July 2023 2 minutes ago, whoareyaaa said: Only to re sign another striker for more money and be on a similar wage brilliant We are going to sign someone on more than 65k a week are we?
whoareyaaa Posted 10 July 2023 Posted 10 July 2023 Just now, Chelmofox said: We are going to sign someone on more than 65k a week are we? I dunno I doubt it
smudger63 Posted 10 July 2023 Posted 10 July 2023 If we are only get £8m for him, then keep him. We won't get anyone near his level to replace him for £8m. I thought the £25m being talked about for Barnes was laughable. £8m for Nacho is just an insult! 3
LFEFox23 Posted 10 July 2023 Posted 10 July 2023 10 minutes ago, Clever Fox said: For 8 million I'd sooner keep him for this season. He's a quality finisher who dare I say it has got under BR. His movement is much better outside the box which has added another dimension to his game. 8 milion is an insult of an offer. Not as straight forward as that, We still have to keep our eye on FFP. The club will be looking at it as 8m + the 90k a week he's on saving... Don't forget his contract is up next summer and doesn't want to sign another one. 2
Popular Post Grebfromgrebland Posted 10 July 2023 Popular Post Posted 10 July 2023 If nacho goes then that pretty much everyone who can score or create gone from the squad. We're better have some very special scouting going right now. 6
Realist Guy In The Room Posted 10 July 2023 Posted 10 July 2023 We haven't got value for money from him whichever way you look at it. Some of that isn't down to him, but let's not pretend he's something he's not. Looking at what he's produced for us in his time here, we clearly overpaid for him when we bought him. He's only really been slightly more acceptable as a signing than Perez because of the purple patch of form he had a couple of years back. With a year left on his deal, he should go. Is £8m too low? Probably but only just. I'd would have expected about £10m but in the interest of moving forward as a club, if it gets it done quick and allows us to move on, take the money and bid a warm farewell. 3
smudger63 Posted 10 July 2023 Posted 10 July 2023 (edited) 5 minutes ago, Chelmofox said: We are going to sign someone on more than 65k a week are we? Well if we believe what we were told by John Percy the other week, then all the players wages have a clause that reduces them by between 30 and 50 per cent, if relegated, and I highly doubt that Nacho has been on over 100 grand a week previously. Edited 10 July 2023 by smudger63
Chelmofox Posted 10 July 2023 Posted 10 July 2023 3 minutes ago, Jimbo said: For £8million? There really isn't Go tell the other scouts that then? People in this game largely know what they are doing. I am sure many of them look at Kels as a potential hidden gem that comes with huge risk. They will have far more insight into how he works, trains and behaves with coaches than we know about. If he was as good as many think he is, they would be queuing up for him.
Rusko187 Posted 10 July 2023 Posted 10 July 2023 He's in last year of a contract isn't he? I love the guy but if he's not signing a new contract then it's time to grab what we can... cannot repeat last years mistakes and lose players on a free. If £8m is the fee, then so be it.. another fine piece of miss-management by our board. 1
5waller5 Posted 10 July 2023 Posted 10 July 2023 2 hours ago, Dahnsouff said: So lose him for free next year? Depends on the fee and whether we can use that fee / use that fee wisely. Under £15m and I’d keep. He’ll make a big difference to our promotion campaign 1
3 titles in 7 years Posted 10 July 2023 Posted 10 July 2023 Anyone suggesting selling Iheanacho for £8million is good business or the preferred route at this point is moronic. He'd score 20 goals next season - well worth his wages. 1
5waller5 Posted 10 July 2023 Posted 10 July 2023 10 minutes ago, Realist Guy In The Room said: We haven't got value for money from him whichever way you look at it. Some of that isn't down to him, but let's not pretend he's something he's not. Looking at what he's produced for us in his time here, we clearly overpaid for him when we bought him. He's only really been slightly more acceptable as a signing than Perez because of the purple patch of form he had a couple of years back. With a year left on his deal, he should go. Is £8m too low? Probably but only just. I'd would have expected about £10m but in the interest of moving forward as a club, if it gets it done quick and allows us to move on, take the money and bid a warm farewell. By “the purple patch of form” you mean when the manager was forced to give him a run in the side. He’s been really badly managed for me, everytime you think he’s undroppable / first name on the team sheet he was dropped. It’s almost like we rewarded his good performances with a seat in the stands.
Dahnsouff Posted 10 July 2023 Posted 10 July 2023 3 minutes ago, 5waller5 said: Depends on the fee and whether we can use that fee / use that fee wisely. Under £15m and I’d keep. He’ll make a big difference to our promotion campaign This always the crux isn't it - can he make the difference to a promotion push?
5waller5 Posted 10 July 2023 Posted 10 July 2023 1 minute ago, Dahnsouff said: This always the crux isn't it - can he make the difference to a promotion push? Yes. The fee is conjecture. Whether he’d make a difference to a promotion push isn’t
whoareyaaa Posted 10 July 2023 Posted 10 July 2023 15 minutes ago, LFEFox23 said: Not as straight forward as that, We still have to keep our eye on FFP. The club will be looking at it as 8m + the 90k a week he's on saving... Don't forget his contract is up next summer and doesn't want to sign another one. I don’t think FFP comes into it right now as it’s based over 3 seasons in the championship I think we are not buying a striker that is capable of scoring and assisting for less than 15/20m so we should hang on to him hope he gets on with the boss and see where we are at next season
LFEFox23 Posted 10 July 2023 Posted 10 July 2023 1 minute ago, whoareyaaa said: I don’t think FFP comes into it right now as it’s based over 3 seasons in the championship I think we are not buying a striker that is capable of scoring and assisting for less than 15/20m so we should hang on to him hope he gets on with the boss and see where we are at next season Maybe the club think we would be fine with Vardy, Daka and Hirst? Also seems we have interest in the Swansea forward who wouldn't cost us that.
Recommended Posts