Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

where does he get 90k/week from ?

 

If he estimates average wage of 30k for admin then that leaves £158m for the 87 playing staff 

if we say that 55 of those are not first team squad so average £2000/week then that brings us to approx 150m for the 32 

 

= average 90k/week for the first team squad 

 

wow!

 

 

Posted (edited)

Hypothetically speaking….

 

If we actually get promoted.

 

We are then forced to sell players albeit they aren’t worth a lot now. they’ll be replaced with free transfer so the quality isn’t as high.

 

Massive points deduction. 
 

Are we getting relegated back to the Championship on minus points? 

Edited by Sly
  • Sad 1
Guest Chocolate Teapot
Posted
1 minute ago, FrankieADZ said:

amazing how the losses seem to get higher once Rodgers got more control etc at the club

 

 

He's left and we're still ****ed so how do you explain that?

Posted
1 hour ago, Pub breath said:

There was a comment made to the Leeds journo at the Athletic, that we're fine.  We would have been close to failing were it not for the sale of Luis Sinisterra but with that sale, we're fine.

Guess we'll know more in the coming days but nobody around the club seems at all concerned about it.

I would suspect you aren’t fine but like you said, we’ll see. 

Posted
32 minutes ago, CosbehFox said:

Yeah mind blowing isn’t it? 

Its ludicrous.

Love to be in a room now with Top, Whelan and Rudkin just looking at the floor...

Posted
Just now, Chocolate Teapot said:

He's left and we're still ****ed so how do you explain that?

He was the start of it.. Peter Taylor 2.0 

Guest Chocolate Teapot
Posted
Just now, chapero82 said:

He was the start of it.. Peter Taylor 2.0 

Who gave him the money?

Posted
6 minutes ago, st albans fox said:

where does he get 90k/week from ?

 

If he estimates average wage of 30k for admin then that leaves £158m for the 87 playing staff 

if we say that 55 of those are not first team squad so average £2000/week then that brings us to approx 150m for the 32 

 

= average 90k/week for the first team squad 

 

wow!

 

 

Doesn’t it include Rodger’s payoff and his staff plus smith and co

Posted (edited)
4 minutes ago, Chocolate Teapot said:

He's left and we're still ****ed so how do you explain that?

20/21 35mil losses

21/22 95mil losses

22/23 90mil losses

 

you think its all suddenly going to change cos he isnt here.....still feeling the after effect of the club approving the garbage brought in

Rudkin loved the man

Edited by FrankieADZ
  • Like 2
Posted
4 minutes ago, FrankieADZ said:

amazing how the losses seem to get higher once Rodgers got more control etc at the club

 

 

For a period, we were running the club to satisfy Rodgers. No signings but got to ensure we don’t sell so we do not upset him further. January transfers when there shouldn’t have been. 
 

Alongside everything else, these turnips made it so that Rodgers was far bigger than the club/badge. 
 

We’ll be paying for their mistakes for years.

  • Like 3
Posted
1 minute ago, HankMarvin said:

Doesn’t it include Rodger’s payoff and his staff plus smith and co

Don’t think the wages do 

 

I think he estimated the same for the previous year 

 

I just didn’t believe it so went through it with assumptions and got to the same place as he did  

Posted
5 minutes ago, Chocolate Teapot said:

He's left and we're still ****ed so how do you explain that?

Because this batch of accounts finish about the time we sacked the ****

  • Haha 1
Posted

God I hope Danny Ward had to take a 99% pay cut this year. Can’t bear to start listing out the other dross who were probably on double the wages they should have been. 

Posted

As much as we can hate on Rodgers - he doesn’t agree the wages we pay players or set a wage budget bigger than revenue.

 

Based on the those numbers we had no interest in meeting the FFP requirements - we absolutely deserve our fine.  It does take time to correct overspend but hopefully whatever division we are in getting rid of a load more players at the end of the season helps with a reset.

 


 

 

Guest Chocolate Teapot
Posted
6 minutes ago, Itsthejoeker said:

Because this batch of accounts finish about the time we sacked the ****

You wait till the next lot come out pal 🤣

Posted
1 minute ago, Finn Claw II said:

As much as we can hate on Rodgers - he doesn’t agree the wages we pay players or set a wage budget bigger than revenue.

 

Based on the those numbers we had no interest in meeting the FFP requirements - we absolutely deserve our fine.  It does take time to correct overspend but hopefully whatever division we are in getting rid of a load more players at the end of the season helps with a reset.

 


 

 

he was a part of the issue, along we Rudkin and Whelan tbf

Guest Chocolate Teapot
Posted
9 minutes ago, FrankieADZ said:

20/21 35mil losses

21/22 95mil losses

22/23 90mil losses

 

you think its all suddenly going to change cos he isnt here.....still feeling the after effect of the club approving the garbage brought in

Rudkin loved the man

And Rudkin is still here pal 

Posted
2 minutes ago, Chocolate Teapot said:

And Rudkin is still here pal 

yeah thats cos Top hasnt got the balls to sack him pal;

think we've all been calling him to go for yrs

Posted
56 minutes ago, CosbehFox said:

Admittance of breaking the rules - does the left hand know what the right is doing? 

I still reckon they are claiming to be within the rules by allocating £200m in allowable losses to COVID, women's football, training ground investments and youth development.

 

I reckon 3 years ago, they didn't think these claims would be overly scrutinised and will now be in an argument over reasonable losses with the PL.

Posted
6 minutes ago, Chocolate Teapot said:

You wait till the next lot come out pal 🤣

Do you think that sacking Rodgers terminated all the massive contracts he handed out whilst he was there?

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...