Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
16 hours ago, ClaphamFox said:

Daka was in Bournemouth on Monday. Probably just enjoying a spot of volleyball on Sandbanks Beach...:whistle:

Isn't volleyball the one where the ball is up in the air? Oh dear.

 

In fairness though, I think you have to get the ball over the net and not in it, could be the way forward for him?

  • Like 1
Posted
17 hours ago, MPH said:


 

that’s a tough call to make, to say he’s a HUGE improvement on Daka. Daka scored goals in the Austrian league and Scmodics has scored in the champ - never played in the prem.

 

id at least like to sign someone who has some top flight experience, personally.

Daka has top flight experience.....and it haunts him to this day

  • Haha 2
Posted

Really not keen on this one, given his age and the suggested price. Would hope we can be more creative than just going for the bloke who scored most Championship goals last season. Evidence from our recruitment last summer suggests there will be other younger and less obvious targets.

  • Like 1
Posted

So many saying not keen cuz of his age many people brainwashed into thinking early 20’s is a must. Remember vardy he was around 27 when we got him 

  • Like 1
  • Haha 1
Posted

What exactly is a szmodics? He wears number 8 indicating a box to box midfielder and isn't leading the line but I've seen many clips of him scoring goals through running onto through balls and being the most advanced player - what is his role exactly? Striker or Am?

Posted
16 minutes ago, Kp1984 said:

So many saying not keen cuz of his age many people brainwashed into thinking early 20’s is a must. Remember vardy he was around 27 when we got him 

Wasn't he 25? 

  • Like 1
Posted
10 minutes ago, Kp1984 said:

So many saying not keen cuz of his age many people brainwashed into thinking early 20’s is a must. Remember vardy he was around 27 when we got him 

Hardly brainwashed.

 

1. There's usually less chance of making a profit or at least getting your money back by the time they've done 3+ years with you.

 

2. By 29 most professional footballers have 15 years+ of wear and tear on their legs. The ones that don't look after themselves and prioritise football at this point tend to start a decline around this age. 

 

Of course he could be a fantastic signing but you can't deny there's a lot more risk when paying a good chunk of money for a 29 year old?

 

 

  • Like 2
Posted

He is far too expensive for what we would be getting, we can get cheaper and better with more potential and resale value elsewhere.

  • Like 2
Posted

One good season in the 2nd tier...29 soon.

 

If there is genuinely interest in us signing this lad we've learned nothing and we're going down with a thud.

Posted
41 minutes ago, Kp1984 said:

So many saying not keen cuz of his age many people brainwashed into thinking early 20’s is a must. Remember vardy he was around 27 when we got him 

HE WAS 25!

 

SS is 29 in September, 15m + would be insane business.

Posted
12 minutes ago, filbertway said:

One good season in the 2nd tier...29 soon.

 

If there is genuinely interest in us signing this lad we've learned nothing and we're going down with a thud.


If the player has a point to prove it’s a good thing I think this is the case with Szmodics.

 

Macauley Langstaff would be another , and very much in the Jamie Vardy mould if we sign these two would be great business.

Posted
41 minutes ago, filbertway said:

One good season in the 2nd tier...29 soon.

 

If there is genuinely interest in us signing this lad we've learned nothing and we're going down with a thud.

Good point. Perez had one good year out of 4 in the Premiership and what an expensive total waste of space he turned out to be!

Posted
37 minutes ago, Happy Fox said:


If the player has a point to prove it’s a good thing I think this is the case with Szmodics.

 

Macauley Langstaff would be another , and very much in the Jamie Vardy mould if we sign these two would be great business.

Langstaff? We are not in league one.

Posted

Nothing about this deal makes sense at all… it doesn’t fit our criteria of signings in any way, he’s 29 in September with a 1 stellar season, unproven at PL level…. I’d be flabbergasted if we pursued this at all…. Even at £10m I wouldn’t be keen 

Posted
19 minutes ago, jonny_wright said:

Nothing about this deal makes sense at all… it doesn’t fit our criteria of signings in any way, he’s 29 in September with a 1 stellar season, unproven at PL level…. I’d be flabbergasted if we pursued this at all…. Even at £10m I wouldn’t be keen 

8q985q.jpg

  • Haha 3
Posted
1 hour ago, Happy Fox said:


If the player has a point to prove it’s a good thing I think this is the case with Szmodics.

 

Macauley Langstaff would be another , and very much in the Jamie Vardy mould if we sign these two would be great business.

I'd rather sign someone with a future at the top level with a point to prove.

Posted

Not sure why Blackburn would consider selling him for so little amount of money. If they can persuade the player to stay they'll be better keeping. 

Posted
5 minutes ago, TommyK said:

Not sure why Blackburn would consider selling him for so little amount of money. If they can persuade the player to stay they'll be better keeping. 

They would bite anyone's hand off for that much. His stock will never be higher.

Posted (edited)
7 hours ago, Kp1984 said:

So many saying not keen cuz of his age many people brainwashed into thinking early 20’s is a must. Remember vardy he was around 27 when we got him 

Edit: beaten to it again

Edited by Foxmeister
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...