Premier League 2024/25

[Nalis]

Neil Maupay is a proper bellend for that Everton tweet isn't he, considering he's still employed by them. Very basic behaviour and a very wannabe poor man's Vardy

Edited 31 December 2024 by Nalis

[The Doctor]

8 hours ago, The Bear said:

 

 

oh you're still being a tool about VAR? shall we go through again the points difference from VAR for your club of thugs?

 

20/21: https://www.planetfootball.com/quick-reads/how-the-premier-league-table-would-look-if-we-didnt-have-var-in-2020-21

+1 point for GBH FC

 

21/22: https://m.allfootballapp.com/news/EPL/How-the-21-22-Premier-League-table-would-look-if-we-didn’t-have-VAR/2849740

+3 points

 

22/23: https://www.90min.com/posts/final-2022-23-premier-league-table-without-var

0 point difference 

 

23/24: https://www.givemesport.com/premier-league-table-without-var/

+6 points

 

you've not ended one single season with VAR worse off than you would have been without it, and 3 seasons better off. 

[The Bear]

Those tables don't take into account the times that VAR should have intervened and didn't. It's been well publicised how much we've been screwed over with decisions or lack of them. 

[Bilo]

21 minutes ago, The Doctor said:

oh you're still being a tool about VAR? shall we go through again the points difference from VAR for your club of thugs?

 

20/21: https://www.planetfootball.com/quick-reads/how-the-premier-league-table-would-look-if-we-didnt-have-var-in-2020-21

+1 point for GBH FC

 

21/22: https://m.allfootballapp.com/news/EPL/How-the-21-22-Premier-League-table-would-look-if-we-didn’t-have-VAR/2849740

+3 points

 

22/23: https://www.90min.com/posts/final-2022-23-premier-league-table-without-var

0 point difference 

 

23/24: https://www.givemesport.com/premier-league-table-without-var/

+6 points

 

you've not ended one single season with VAR worse off than you would have been without it, and 3 seasons better off. 

This injustice exists purely in his head.

 

The fact he's still persisting with it when Cunha has effectively got off without a meaningful sanction, he's injured so wouldn't have featured against Forest and probably would have been rested for Bristol City, means he's just being a piss poor troll.

[The Doctor]

16 minutes ago, The Bear said:

Those tables don't take into account the times that VAR should have intervened and didn't. It's been well publicised how much we've been screwed over with decisions or lack of them. 

those times don't exist. VAR intervenes for offsides, penalty calls, goals and red cards. You've not been "screwed over with decisions", you've very demonstrably gained from them. What you're doing is remembering subjective decisions that went your way as correct and subjective decisions that went against you as obviously incorrect. Your victim complex about VAR in the face of your striker getting a lesser punishment for GBH than Eric Dier got for celebrating with fans just makes you look like an utter tool.

[The Bear]

Just now, Bilo said:

This injustice exists purely in his head.

 

The fact he's still persisting with it when Cunha has effectively got off without a meaningful sanction, he's injured so wouldn't have featured against Forest and probably would have been rested for Bristol City, means he's just being a piss poor troll.

I've never been a troll or a WUM in the 15 or so years I've been posting on here. 

 

Just because you had a major bitch-fit OTT reaction, doesn't justify all the name calling. Or indeed the sad and pathetic hopes for a player to get a season ending injury. 

[Bilo]

3 minutes ago, The Bear said:

I've never been a troll or a WUM in the 15 or so years I've been posting on here. 

 

Just because you had a major bitch-fit OTT reaction, doesn't justify all the name calling. Or indeed the sad and pathetic hopes for a player to get a season ending injury. 

If you genuinely believe the crap you're posting, then I can only assume you have an acquired brain injury.

[The Bear]

2 minutes ago, The Doctor said:

those times don't exist. VAR intervenes for offsides, penalty calls, goals and red cards. You've not been "screwed over with decisions", you've very demonstrably gained from them. What you're doing is remembering subjective decisions that went your way as correct and subjective decisions that went against you as obviously incorrect. Your victim complex about VAR in the face of your striker getting a lesser punishment for GBH than Eric Dier got for celebrating with fans just makes you look like an utter tool.

"Wolves have seen the net score of decisions overturned by VAR go against them by 20 - more than any other top-flight side over the last five seasons" 

 

https://www.birminghammail.co.uk/sport/football/football-news/premier-league-var-table-shows-30205938?int_source=amp_continue_reading&int_medium=amp&int_campaign=continue_reading_button#google_vignette

 

 

"Premier League VAR decisions overturned net score.

 

Brighton +9 Newcastle +6 Man City +5 Aston Villa +3 Crystal Palace +3 Liverpool +3 Man United +3 Chelsea +2 Everton +1 Tottenham -3 Arsenal -6 West Ham -7 Wolves -20." 

 

And as I mentioned that still doesn't account for the shite decisions against us just waved away by VAR. 

 

Any way, that's me done for this argument. I'll leave it so as not to derial the thread any more. Apologies to those who've had to suffer it. 

[Bilo]

2 minutes ago, The Bear said:

"Wolves have seen the net score of decisions overturned by VAR go against them by 20 - more than any other top-flight side over the last five seasons" 

 

https://www.birminghammail.co.uk/sport/football/football-news/premier-league-var-table-shows-30205938?int_source=amp_continue_reading&int_medium=amp&int_campaign=continue_reading_button#google_vignette

 

 

"Premier League VAR decisions overturned net score.

 

Brighton +9 Newcastle +6 Man City +5 Aston Villa +3 Crystal Palace +3 Liverpool +3 Man United +3 Chelsea +2 Everton +1 Tottenham -3 Arsenal -6 West Ham -7 Wolves -20." 

 

And as I mentioned that still doesn't account for the shite decisions against us just waved away by VAR. 

 

Any way, that's me done for this argument. I'll leave it so as not to derial the thread any more. Apologies to those who've had to suffer it. 

 

[The Doctor]

3 minutes ago, The Bear said:

"Wolves have seen the net score of decisions overturned by VAR go against them by 20 - more than any other top-flight side over the last five seasons" 

 

https://www.birminghammail.co.uk/sport/football/football-news/premier-league-var-table-shows-30205938?int_source=amp_continue_reading&int_medium=amp&int_campaign=continue_reading_button#google_vignette

 

 

"Premier League VAR decisions overturned net score.

 

Brighton +9 Newcastle +6 Man City +5 Aston Villa +3 Crystal Palace +3 Liverpool +3 Man United +3 Chelsea +2 Everton +1 Tottenham -3 Arsenal -6 West Ham -7 Wolves -20." 

 

And as I mentioned that still doesn't account for the shite decisions against us just waved away by VAR. 

 

Any way, that's me done for this argument. I'll leave it so as not to derial the thread any more. Apologies to those who've had to suffer it. 

so, basically "if a decision is made that doesn't benefit us, it's a conspiracy"  never mind a tin foil hat, this is a three piece suit at this point.

[Craig]

15 minutes ago, Bilo said:

This injustice exists purely in his head.

 

The fact he's still persisting with it when Cunha has effectively got off without a meaningful sanction, he's injured so wouldn't have featured against Forest and probably would have been rested for Bristol City, means he's just being a piss poor troll.

It's not just him. It's all Wolves and it's hilarious.

 

Even if you ignore this, they think the PL has been against them for years.
 

Why though?

 

They're on a par with Bournemouth for relevance. 

[grobyfox1990]

8 minutes ago, The Doctor said:

those times don't exist. VAR intervenes for offsides, penalty calls, goals and red cards. You've not been "screwed over with decisions", you've very demonstrably gained from them. What you're doing is remembering subjective decisions that went your way as correct and subjective decisions that went against you as obviously incorrect. Your victim complex about VAR in the face of your striker getting a lesser punishment for GBH than Eric Dier got for celebrating with fans just makes you look like an utter tool.

Wow a weirdly strong reaction and name calling, are you a West Brom fan?!? The Onana assault on the wolves striker at old Trafford last season, that scandalous last min pen winner to sheff u and the one Newcastle got when their player kicked the grass are the ones I can remember off the top of my head 

[Bilo]

Just now, Craig said:

It's not just him. It's all Wolves and it's hilarious.

 

Even if you ignore this, they think the PL has been against them for years.
 

Why though?

 

They're on a par with Bournemouth for relevance. 

Probably the most milquetoast club in this division realistically. 

 

Not bothering the big boys and this is their first season in a real relegation battle for years. 

[Bilo]

1 minute ago, grobyfox1990 said:

Wow a weirdly strong reaction and name calling, are you a West Brom fan?!? The Onana assault on the wolves striker at old Trafford last season, that scandalous last min pen winner to sheff u and the one Newcastle got when their player kicked the grass are the ones I can remember off the top of my head 

But the data shows that Wolves have actually benefited more from VAR than VAR has cost them, so it more than balances out. 

[The Doctor]

17 minutes ago, grobyfox1990 said:

Wow a weirdly strong reaction and name calling, are you a West Brom fan?!? The Onana assault on the wolves striker at old Trafford last season, that scandalous last min pen winner to sheff u and the one Newcastle got when their player kicked the grass are the ones I can remember off the top of my head 

one or two decisions against doesn't outweigh the clear points gain in favour, and that "we've had more decisions against us in net" is not looking for a second if the decisions were actually right, it's just "decision made by the ref, overturned by VAR", so the stat is that a net 20 decisions made by the ref were incorrectly given in favour of wolves.

[It'sblueupnorth]

1 hour ago, The Bear said:

"Wolves have seen the net score of decisions overturned by VAR go against them by 20 - more than any other top-flight side over the last five seasons" 

 

https://www.birminghammail.co.uk/sport/football/football-news/premier-league-var-table-shows-30205938?int_source=amp_continue_reading&int_medium=amp&int_campaign=continue_reading_button#google_vignette

 

 

"Premier League VAR decisions overturned net score.

 

Brighton +9 Newcastle +6 Man City +5 Aston Villa +3 Crystal Palace +3 Liverpool +3 Man United +3 Chelsea +2 Everton +1 Tottenham -3 Arsenal -6 West Ham -7 Wolves -20." 

 

And as I mentioned that still doesn't account for the shite decisions against us just waved away by VAR. 

 

Any way, that's me done for this argument. I'll leave it so as not to derial the thread any more. Apologies to those who've had to suffer it. 

But all that means is the wrong decision was made without var intervention. You’re delusional 

[KFS]

1 hour ago, Craig said:

It's not just him. It's all Wolves and it's hilarious.

 

Even if you ignore this, they think the PL has been against them for years.
 

Why though?

 

They're on a par with Bournemouth for relevance. 

I’ve got a wolves fan at work and ever since we went down he’s assumed some bizarre big brother complex as if we aren’t the fifth most decorated English club in the last 10 years. Also makes comments about Leicester being a shithole as if Wolverhampton is the midlands Maldives. They’re proper strange.

 

 

[iancognito]

5 hours ago, Corky said:

Alexander-Arnold needs to expect a lot of lecturing about how his Liverpool legacy could be changed by possibly joining the club who have dominated Europe for the past decade.

The Bellingham effect.

 

Not to mention Oliseh and Kane at Bayern. It's not the big jump people used to imagine it to be.

[filbertway]

I would say if you don't  think that wolves have taken a battering from VARr. You probably shower with your relatives 

Edited 1 January by filbertway

[Sly]

Wolves have definitely had some rough treatment from VAR not intervening in situations where it should have done.

 

I also think the Cunha situation could have been dealt with significantly better. 
 

No surprise that the Premier League and the inconsistent approach it uses though, are a bit of a farce. 

 

The Pedro one at Brighton will be interesting, as he’s clearly tried to elbow Yarmolyuk. Clear intent, but how many players going storming into tackles and miss? 

[Samilktray]

Wolves deserve all they get for having probably the 3 worst football kits the premier league has ever seen 

[Nalis]

Going against the grain here but I don't mind Wolves in general. If we werent struggling there are at least 10 teams I'd like to see relegated from the premier league over them.

[Muzzy_no7]

On 31/12/2024 at 11:01, Bilo said:

It's just occurred to me that Robert Huth got the same ban for playing Cock or No Cock on Twitter.

 

😂

Two Tier 👀

[ARTY_FOX]

12 hours ago, KFS said:

I’ve got a wolves fan at work and ever since we went down he’s assumed some bizarre big brother complex as if we aren’t the fifth most decorated English club in the last 10 years. Also makes comments about Leicester being a shithole as if Wolverhampton is the midlands Maldives. They’re proper strange.

 

 

It stretches beyond 10 years. 

[Muzzy_no7]

8 minutes ago, ARTY_FOX said:

It stretches beyond 10 years. 

Better put we are the 6th most successful team in the country in the modern era.