Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
Just now, splinterdream said:

Does this mean we cannot get another loan?

 

As i read into it, we can only register 2 loans at any 1 time, but can register a maximum of 4 loans in 1 season,

 

So we can de register Edouard to register another, but would still have to pay his wages, some £90k a week. An expensive error again.

If this is the case, it simply HAS to happen. Yesterday. 

Posted

Are palace still a relegation threat? If it makes us weaker by us keeping him of course they will not let him back under any conditions thinking about it.

Posted
Just now, moore_94 said:

Can be registered for 3 but only play for 2

 

So he could be sold, but just can’t play for them

 

Tomayto, tomahto, the damage is done. Nobody is going to buy him now and they certainly can't loan him. 

 

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, Foxin_Mad said:

This another prime example why Jon Rudkin the useless **** should be down the dole centre. Just **** off you worthless piece of dogshit. 

I'm going to take a stab in the dark and say you're not a fan of Rudkin?! :D

 

Tbf I think you've summed concisely how the majority of us feel.

Edited by Incognito
  • Like 1
Posted

Just to remind everyone - the Foxes Trust board members opinion on Jon:

 

Midway through the second half, when the score was still 1-1 there were some puzzling chants about Jon Rudkin, including some rather unpleasant ones.  He is one of a team and I don’t believe should be singled out for a collective failure.  I hope he has a thick skin!  

 

Now, just so the Foxes Trust have the benefit of their ridiculously poor disclaimer - this was in a match report (Fulham away THIS SEASON) and they (Foxes Trust) dont like to take credit for it but this is the sort of fans we are working against. The director of the department which has categorically failed for so long should not be singled out. This was the organisation which was set up to protect this club post administration.  **** me, honestly. 

 

No be mean boys and girls, Jon for his £300k plus benefits a year is not responsible here - its a team game. 

  • Like 3
  • Thanks 1
Posted
1 minute ago, les-tah said:

Are palace still a relegation threat? If it makes us weaker by us keeping him of course they will not let him back under any conditions thinking about it.

It's entirely in our gift to use him or not though. We can leave him unregistered and loan another so there's a financial impact to it, but it shouldn't hold anything else up. If there's another loan we want in then this is the route we should take.

Posted

FCUK me this deal is sounding more diabolical the more I understand it.

we are so desperate at the moment we can’t afford these kinds of mistakes.

Posted (edited)
6 minutes ago, Number 6 said:

It's entirely in our gift to use him or not though. We can leave him unregistered and loan another so there's a financial impact to it, but it shouldn't hold anything else up. If there's another loan we want in then this is the route we should take.

based on my reading of this it is not possible and you cannot have another prem loan until you formally end the agreement with the parent club in question.

Edited by les-tah
Posted

I want We want Jon Rudkin out chants every game now. If we are losing to Palace or Fulham this month especially it needs to be toxic towards that idiot. Complete moron. 

Posted
9 minutes ago, cityfanlee23 said:

If this is the case, it simply HAS to happen. Yesterday. 

I don't think this happens unless we sign a striker, and I don't think we sign anyone till we know where we are with PSR and the Premier League

Posted (edited)
2 minutes ago, BigC said:

I want We want Jon Rudkin out chants every game now. If we are losing to Palace or Fulham this month especially it needs to be toxic towards that idiot. Complete moron. 

a chant would be ignored. But a mass walk out of the fans would certainly make the papers🤣

Edited by les-tah
Posted
Just now, splinterdream said:

I don't think this happens unless we sign a striker, and I don't think we sign anyone till we know where we are with PSR and the Premier League

Sadly I think you're right. One half of me says don't spend big we need to be stable if we go down, the other half says this is it, do or die, spend.

Posted
1 minute ago, les-tah said:

based on my reading of this it is not possible and you cannot have another prem loan until you formally end the agreement with the parent club in question.

"Premier league clubs may not register more than two loan players on loan at any one time.

 

The maximum number of loans registerable in the same season is four, and, under no circumstances, shall more than one be from the same club at any one time".

 

So there's a financial impact to it, and it prevents us loaning more then 2 more or any from Palace, but that's a pretty small impact.

Posted
22 minutes ago, Dan LCFC said:

It's just the most spectacularly badly run club in the league. Doesn't even really annoy me anymore. It's laughable at this point.

Southampton and Leicester 🤝 this is why we finish 19th and them 20th 

Posted
2 minutes ago, jonny_wright said:

Up to a £5m loan fee and 100k a week, gotta be up there with one of the worse pieces of business we’ve ever done.

 

enough is enough, Glover & Rudkin out

He’s surely not on £100k a week 😂

Posted
23 minutes ago, Dan LCFC said:

It's just the most spectacularly badly run club in the league. Doesn't even really annoy me anymore. It's laughable at this point.

Same. Not even bothered about relegation. Why should we care? We have zero influence on the running of this club and we have the most incompetent morons in charge. Fully ready for another decade in the EFL

  • Like 1
Posted
Just now, cityfanlee23 said:

Sadly I think you're right. One half of me says don't spend big we need to be stable if we go down, the other half says this is it, do or die, spend.

I'd be really interested to know exactly what the EFL can do to the club should we get relegated. I've heard they can force a club to make a business plan, what does that mean?

 

Can the EFL force us to sell or could we make sure now we'd have a team should we face a registration embargo?

 

If anyone knows I think it could be really relevent to this transfer window

  • Like 1
Posted

Feels like clubs see Rudkin as a soft touch.

 

Levy did a number on him regarding Skipp. Now Parish and co have done a number on him over Edouard. 
 

As I’ve said before regarding Rudkin, there’s a reason he doesn’t get linked with more higher profile director of football roles, because he’s shite. 

  • Like 1
Posted
3 minutes ago, Number 6 said:

"Premier league clubs may not register more than two loan players on loan at any one time.

 

The maximum number of loans registerable in the same season is four, and, under no circumstances, shall more than one be from the same club at any one time".

 

So there's a financial impact to it, and it prevents us loaning more then 2 more or any from Palace, but that's a pretty small impact.

But contractually we will still be loaning him from palace. 
 

i wish you was right but i just dont think its the simple.

Posted
1 minute ago, foxfanazer said:

Same. Not even bothered about relegation. Why should we care? We have zero influence on the running of this club and we have the most incompetent morons in charge. Fully ready for another decade in the EFL

I enjoyed last season, tickets were affordable, mid week night games, but if you're struggling in the championship, it can be awful

Posted
1 minute ago, les-tah said:

But contractually we will still be loaning him from palace. 
 

i wish you was right but i just dont think its the simple.

Sure, he'll be loaned to us for the remainder of the season, but he won't be registered and won't be able to play (if there is another loan in we want).

Posted
1 minute ago, les-tah said:

But contractually we will still be loaning him from palace. 
 

i wish you was right but i just dont think its the simple.

right, so the only way you can register 4 in 1 season is if the parent club has the loanees back. Wow, how bad is that for us

Posted
1 minute ago, splinterdream said:

I enjoyed last season, tickets were affordable, mid week night games, but if you're struggling in the championship, it can be awful

Yeah I don't think we're gonna dominate like last season. And the EFL will hit us with all they can. 

 

But I've said it before, if rather us take a big step backwards and have a clear out and then start to do things the right way again. Hopefully under a whole new regime

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...