Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content
 Share
Ryy

Ezechiel Banzuzi

By Ryy, in Transfer Talk

Recommended Posts

  • Popular Post
The Doctor

The Doctor

Posted
  • Popular Post
Posted
9 minutes ago, urban.spaceman said:

The DOF at Leuven must be a ****ing idiot. 

at a guess Rudkin kept trying to fax him an offer letter and got confused why it was coming back to him

  • Haha 11
MPH

MPH

Posted
Posted
54 minutes ago, coolhandfox said:

Did he ever say he was buying then for our benefit.

 Not actually sure what other reason  he would have bought them for?  He bought us to increase the exposure of the king power brand. No offense to Belgian league football but I don’t think it’s the most watched in Europe and I’m not sure what benefit it would be for king power to own them…

HitchinFox

HitchinFox

Posted
Posted

 

2 hours ago, Ric Flair said:

Might as well refer to them as OH Leave-it, given the complete reluctance for us to benefit from the multi club model. 


Rudkin and Whelan are still figuring it all out. Give them time. They've only had 7,5 years to find ways for us to benefit from it. 



 

KFS

KFS

Posted
Posted

What’s the point of Jon wasting his time on a minnow like that when we’ve got real ****ing problems to deal with? Either sell one of us off or set up a functioning DoF for both clubs and preferably give us the one who’s not brain dead

Royston.

Royston.

Posted
Posted
59 minutes ago, MPH said:

 Not actually sure what other reason  he would have bought them for?  He bought us to increase the exposure of the king power brand. No offense to Belgian league football but I don’t think it’s the most watched in Europe and I’m not sure what benefit it would be for king power to own them…

did Vichai buy it so he could eventually **** Top off and let him run it

 

 

 

 

(into the ground):brendan:

Simonb

Simonb

Posted
Posted

Will play like Zidane against us. Can't even say I can't believe this had happened.. but even more ridiculous it's to a rival. We're a right mess

Vlad the Fox

Vlad the Fox

Posted
Posted
3 hours ago, Royston. said:

did Vichai buy it so he could eventually **** Top off and let him run it

 

 

 

 

(into the ground):brendan:

I was told that the idea was that Top would run them to gain experience for eventually taking over from Vichai here. Unfortunately Top had to take over here a lot sooner than planned after his father’s death. 

Gamble92

Gamble92

Posted
Posted
10 hours ago, Vlad the Fox said:

I was told that the idea was that Top would run them to gain experience for eventually taking over from Vichai here. Unfortunately Top had to take over here a lot sooner than planned after his father’s death. 

I think even when Vichai was alive, it wasn't exactly a Master and apprentice type situation. Top had enough power to sack Pearson and then watch him get reinstated. 

 

I think it's a bit of a myth that all would be well with Vichai. Better maybe, but they still heavily leaned on Rudkin and we'd have seen a lot of this still happen. 

  • Popular Post
Vlad the Fox

Vlad the Fox

Posted
  • Popular Post
Posted
7 minutes ago, Gamble92 said:

I think even when Vichai was alive, it wasn't exactly a Master and apprentice type situation. Top had enough power to sack Pearson and then watch him get reinstated. 

 

I think it's a bit of a myth that all would be well with Vichai. Better maybe, but they still heavily leaned on Rudkin and we'd have seen a lot of this still happen. 

Was also told that the sacking never happened, reporters overheard Vichai ranting about the result and mentioned sacking but it never happened. When the news broke it caught them cold as they didn’t know what was happening.

 

Totaly agree, the crime was dismantling the set up that Pearson built when Rodgers was manager. That set up covered a lot of the ills that we’re seeing now. If Top had any sense he’d be working on bringing people in to make us a functioning football club again which would probably have a bigger impact than any budget signing we got in the next week or so. Enzo had discussions in the summer with the club about bringing more people in above him to assist those already there, the club agreed but he then left.
 

Why didn’t the club restructure and put these people in place even though Enzo then left, surely they saw that it was needed, surely they can see that what they’re doing now isn’t working year after year and something needs to change. If they had put this into action they’d have probably avoided much of the reaction we're seeing now and if they had any sense they’d be working to get good football people in now to start the restructuring process as it’s only going one way otherwise.
 

Their internal review should have highlighted this, did the trust ever ask for the results of that review?

  • Like 7
Plastik Man

Plastik Man

Posted
Posted
13 minutes ago, Vlad the Fox said:

Was also told that the sacking never happened, reporters overheard Vichai ranting about the result and mentioned sacking but it never happened. When the news broke it caught them cold as they didn’t know what was happening.

 

Totaly agree, the crime was dismantling the set up that Pearson built when Rodgers was manager. That set up covered a lot of the ills that we’re seeing now. If Top had any sense he’d be working on bringing people in to make us a functioning football club again which would probably have a bigger impact than any budget signing we got in the next week or so. Enzo had discussions in the summer with the club about bringing more people in above him to assist those already there, the club agreed but he then left.
 

Why didn’t the club restructure and put these people in place even though Enzo then left, surely they saw that it was needed, surely they can see that what they’re doing now isn’t working year after year and something needs to change. If they had put this into action they’d have probably avoided much of the reaction we're seeing now and if they had any sense they’d be working to get good football people in now to start the restructuring process as it’s only going one way otherwise.
 

Their internal review should have highlighted this, did the trust ever ask for the results of that review?

We can only hope!

 

It's depressing to think we don't even expect the club to comment on this, and the signs so far is they've done the square root of nothing to address it.

  • Like 1
Richmondfox

Richmondfox

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, Vlad the Fox said:

Was also told that the sacking never happened, reporters overheard Vichai ranting about the result and mentioned sacking but it never happened. When the news broke it caught them cold as they didn’t know what was happening.

 

Totaly agree, the crime was dismantling the set up that Pearson built when Rodgers was manager. That set up covered a lot of the ills that we’re seeing now. If Top had any sense he’d be working on bringing people in to make us a functioning football club again which would probably have a bigger impact than any budget signing we got in the next week or so. Enzo had discussions in the summer with the club about bringing more people in above him to assist those already there, the club agreed but he then left.
 

Why didn’t the club restructure and put these people in place even though Enzo then left, surely they saw that it was needed, surely they can see that what they’re doing now isn’t working year after year and something needs to change. If they had put this into action they’d have probably avoided much of the reaction we're seeing now and if they had any sense they’d be working to get good football people in now to start the restructuring process as it’s only going one way otherwise.
 

Their internal review should have highlighted this, did the trust ever ask for the results of that review?

Were those doing the internal review reviewing themselves? That would be why the same errors keep getting repeated. 

  • Like 2
Sly

Sly

Posted
Posted
46 minutes ago, brownboy93 said:

If we don't get him in, then sincerely f*** this club exactly what we need 

 

46 minutes ago, brownboy93 said:

If we don't get him in, then sincerely f*** this club exactly what we need 

 

46 minutes ago, brownboy93 said:

If we don't get him in, then sincerely f*** this club exactly what we need 

It’s like a Foxestalk echo chamber :riyad:

  • Haha 2

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...