Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

The chants on 14 mins lead to TNT talking about the issues and a few mins highlighting the concerns, and for the first 30 secs were load.

Well done to this taking part and standing up to those who are obviously ‘sponsored’ by KPFC on this forum to diffuse and deflect. 

  • Like 4
Posted

I fully support this however just a few thoughts:

- I think it's the wrong route to ask for communication and transparency when talking about what's going on at board level and around PSR etc. Your never going to get that from a club competing at the top of the pyramid in the English game, I don't know of any club that does.

- I do however agree the communication between the club and fans groups is massively lacking around fans concerns with the club, the new fan engagement role or whatever it was seems to be an empty role

- I agree with others that going down the personal route isn't the way to take it, there needs to be accountability across all levels of leadership at the club. While the DoF is clearly not performing to expected levels, the club is operating questionably in all areas

- My biggest gripe and I think one that resonates with others but feels like it hasn't been touched upon is that to the rest of the world we may be Leicester City, but to us the supporters it feels like we are very much Leicester only in name and King Power FC in every sense, we have, lost our club.

 

As I say, no hate, I fully support this, just my thoughts after today.

  • Like 3
Posted
3 minutes ago, Iwebema said:

Whilst we can agree/disagree about whether it was done in the right way, it has absolutely shone a spotlight on it and that's just the first one where no doubt many people were on the fence to see how it was received. 

 

For TNT to bring it up several times, actually discuss where and why is coming from and at points suggest they can understand the frustrations is a huge leap. 

Totally. I didn't really agree with how they went about it, but I don't think you can say they failed to make a point.

Posted
9 minutes ago, niyaminski said:

Nothing will happen. Rudkin will keep his job and soon we’ll be back in League One. 
 

Was Top there today?

No. He dodged it. Hope he had a good excuse not to face the music...

Posted

Well done to all who organised this. Thought it was a decent turn out and hopefully it will grow.

 

Sack the board

Posted

If Top and Rudkin have been touched by the demo and another defeat then Ruud will probably be paying the price pretty soon to shield them both :unsure:

  • Like 1
  • Sad 1
Posted

So not only was it obvious that the words used in the programme notes weren't his, he also decides to go into hiding by not turning up on match day. Not exactly doing himself any favours here is he.

  • Like 1
Posted
1 minute ago, l444ry said:

If Top and Rudkin have been touched by the demo and another defeat then Ruud will probably be paying the price pretty soon to shield them both :unsure:

Well said.

Posted
2 minutes ago, l444ry said:

If Top and Rudkin have been touched by the demo and another defeat then Ruud will probably be paying the price pretty soon to shield them both :unsure:

Ruud will walk.

 

You could tell from the presser he wanted this to go ahead. He wants change and we will not change. Top is too weak. 

Posted
1 minute ago, Trev3939 said:

Think we have to continue by doing more at the Brentford game- only way to make change 

Yes...don't make this a one off.

Posted (edited)

Needs a more concentrated effort next time. A bit more leadership and maybe meet at a different location? My experience was the crowd got diluted at the crossroads and mingled in with regular ticket holders. The chanting stopped and we ended up finding ourselves walking to the game 😂 We eventually heard a little bit of Rudkin Out in the distance, but couldn’t find the rest. It felt a bit disappointing.
 

Good start to those who organised because they’ve sacrificed a lot of time to try and make a difference. We just need to do it with more togetherness and perhaps using a boozer as a meeting point which also crosses a main road didn’t have the best of results.

 

The one gripe, to the twat throwing the flares… What’s the point of chucking them in Freemans common car park? Thanks for getting yellow shit all over my son’s trainers and jeans - f**king m0ng. 

Edited by phoneticerror
  • Haha 1
Posted (edited)

It wasn't perfect but it's a start. Should be now done before all future home games. Soon be the only reason for going. 

Edited by Gazza3
  • Like 3
Posted

As people have suggested think it was planned very well, but there was no leadership on ground and a lot of people seemed confused about the plan. 
 

I understand the leaders may well have wanted to remain unidentifiable to the club, but someone needs to lead this if it’s going to work. 

  • Like 2
  • Thanks 1
Posted
4 minutes ago, Trev3939 said:

As people have suggested think it was planned very well, but there was no leadership on ground and a lot of people seemed confused about the plan. 
 

I understand the leaders may well have wanted to remain unidentifiable to the club, but someone needs to lead this if it’s going to work. 

You cannot meet at a pub and expect all to go well without leadership. Put a bloody mask on and lead the crowd - that will make a difference. 

Posted
3 hours ago, sishades said:

Considering the abuse that myself and others have received from supporters of your "cause" i politely want to tell you to feck off.

My cause? Just re-advertising the cause.

 

Pull your bobble hat over your ears a bit more and block out the nasty words from the nasty men.

Posted
Just now, phoneticerror said:

You cannot meet at a pub and expect all to go well without leadership. Put a bloody mask on and lead the crowd - that will make a difference. 

I think if people are worried about future bans and being identified maybe the initial meet up needs to be lead by those already banned? They have nothing to lose at that point and can afford to be louder and coordinate things 

Not sure how you do the post match sit ins though 

Well done @ProjectReset on getting things started today 

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)
33 minutes ago, phoneticerror said:

Needs a more concentrated effort next time. A bit more leadership and maybe meet at a different location? My experience was the crowd got diluted at the crossroads and mingled in with regular ticket holders. The chanting stopped and we ended up finding ourselves walking to the game 😂 We eventually heard a little bit of Rudkin Out in the distance, but couldn’t find the rest. It felt a bit disappointing.
 

Good start to those who organised because they’ve sacrificed a lot of time to try and make a difference. We just need to do it with more togetherness and perhaps using a boozer as a meeting point which also crosses a main road didn’t have the best of results.

 

The one gripe, to the twat throwing the flares… What’s the point of chucking them in Freemans common car park? Thanks for getting yellow shit all over my son’s trainers and jeans - f**king m0ng. 

Echo the above.

Met outside the pub and there you had a decent turn out.

BUT 0 leadership just like our club.

Get some people in charge to organise when and where to walk en route.

Keep together with the leaders organising the group.

Sing the same thing to the ground and dont just walk off in different groups.

 

Got to keep doing it and keep the momentum and learn from it.

Good effort though @ProjectReset dont get demoralised just learn how to get it better👍🏾

Edited by Raj
  • Like 2
Posted

I think we’ll get a lot more traction with “sack the board” or “you’re not fit to run this club” than we will targeting Rudkin. He's a pawn in all this, the issue comes down to Top not knowing how to run a football club 

Posted
4 minutes ago, polarbear said:

I think if people are worried about future bans and being identified maybe the initial meet up needs to be lead by those already banned? They have nothing to lose at that point and can afford to be louder and coordinate things 

Not sure how you do the post match sit ins though 

Well done @ProjectReset on getting things started today 

Imagine instead of spending £500 on the vans, we spent it on printing Rudkin masks and everybody marched wearing them. As we get to the ground, the leaders can mingle back into the crowd and not be easily identified 

  • Thanks 1

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...