davieG Posted 24 January 2025 Posted 24 January 2025 Sgt Scholar · Follow Old but maternal fornicating [Au] from The Logic of Science [Sgt Scholar Actual] 3
Mike the Metal Ed Posted 24 January 2025 Posted 24 January 2025 3 hours ago, ramboacdc said: Not a chance of an amendment in the constitution. They don't have 66% of congress Don't underestimate how dumb some Democrats are.
bovril Posted 24 January 2025 Posted 24 January 2025 (edited) 10 hours ago, Nalis said: Very true Can't stand even seeing a pic of the Southport killer in the same way I cant stand seeing a pic of Lucy Letby. Of course, but I think a huge problem is that since the summer of 2020, after George Floyd's death in the US, we've imported lots of American talking points on race - the problems of 'whiteness' and white on black violence in the UK. A lot of people resent that and are very quick to push back the other way when something like Southport happens. Edited 24 January 2025 by bovril
Trav Le Bleu Posted 25 January 2025 Posted 25 January 2025 (edited) US doesn't need Canadian energy or cars, says Trump Source: BBC It's ironic that the UN hq is in a country that wants nothing to do with the rest of the world. Edited 25 January 2025 by Trav Le Bleu
Zear0 Posted 25 January 2025 Posted 25 January 2025 1 minute ago, Trav Le Bleu said: US doesn't need Canadian energy or cars, says Trump Source: BBC https://search.app/sbbn Nobody needs Canadian cars.
Trav Le Bleu Posted 25 January 2025 Posted 25 January 2025 2 minutes ago, Zear0 said: Nobody needs America. Fixed 1
leicsmac Posted 25 January 2025 Posted 25 January 2025 (edited) 6 minutes ago, Trav Le Bleu said: US doesn't need Canadian energy or cars, says Trump Source: BBC It's ironic that the UN hq is in a country that wants nothing to do with the rest of the world. For someone apparently keen to limit the ascendancy of China on the world stage, his actions sure do look like ones that preclude them stepping into the fold as world leaders on several global matters. Edited 25 January 2025 by leicsmac
Lionator Posted 25 January 2025 Posted 25 January 2025 Imagine upping your military spending for a generational Cold War 2 situation with Russia only to have your biggest land mass and natural resources invaded and looted by your most important ally.
Foxdiamond Posted 25 January 2025 Posted 25 January 2025 2 minutes ago, Lionator said: Imagine upping your military spending for a generational Cold War 2 situation with Russia only to have your biggest land mass and natural resources invaded and looted by your most important ally. I don't suppose Trump has considered why Canadians don't want to be part of the US either in the past or now
Lionator Posted 25 January 2025 Posted 25 January 2025 11 minutes ago, Foxdiamond said: I don't suppose Trump has considered why Canadians don't want to be part of the US either in the past or now I was thinking about Denmark which in combination with your comment makes Trump look even worse! 1
SpacedX Posted 25 January 2025 Posted 25 January 2025 (edited) On 24/01/2025 at 14:10, davieG said: Sgt Scholar · Follow Old but maternal fornicating [Au] from The Logic of Science [Sgt Scholar Actual] Christ, it's no different to attempting to reason with @Otis or @Legend_in_blue Edited 25 January 2025 by SpacedX 3
Lionator Posted 26 January 2025 Posted 26 January 2025 This very informed expert appears to suggest that if Trump-Putin talks fail to reach an agreement, Putin will likely invade NATO territory and declare WW3. We’re also doing a test of the nationwide alert system again. While it’s used for weather, it’s obvious that its true dark purpose will be as an air raid/missile warning system. These are very very dark times.
Sampson Posted 26 January 2025 Posted 26 January 2025 (edited) Not a massive fan of the concept of the Vatican, but the Pope seems to be one of the world leaders I agree with most these days which definitely hasn’t always been the case, and I agree with him a lot in this article. If nothing else, I completely agree that the American Christian Right is often inherently unchristian. https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c0jnz8q6p32o Edited 26 January 2025 by Sampson 2
foxy boxing Posted 26 January 2025 Posted 26 January 2025 4 minutes ago, Sampson said: Not a massive fan of the concept of the Vatican, but the Pope seems to be one of the world leaders I agree with most these days which definitely hasn’t always been the case, and I agree with him a lot in this article. If nothing else, I completely agree that the American Christian Right is often inherently unchristian. https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c0jnz8q6p32o The American Fundamentalist Christian Right (fixed it for you!) . Who believe they are right about everything with no compromise. They are not just unchristian but are inherently unhinged and dangerous. 1
Sampson Posted 26 January 2025 Posted 26 January 2025 (edited) Seeing Rachel Reeves scramble round making the most un-Labour of economic changes - reducing benefits and reducing taxes on the wealthy and saying growth is more important than climate change while refusing to budge on rejoining the single market, showing that growth at all costs clearly doesn’t mean growth at all costs is depressing. I think uk is just completely ****ed economically though. Like it’s not just that the money just isn’t there, but it’s that’s there’s genuinely absolutely nothing any government could do to even help get the economy back on track. Genuinely feel like we have the same conditions as the Weimar Republic and the same metaphorical powder keg waiting to go off right now sadly. Edited 26 January 2025 by Sampson 4
Daggers Posted 26 January 2025 Posted 26 January 2025 On 24/01/2025 at 14:49, Mike the Metal Ed said: Don't underestimate how dumb some Democrats are. Don't underestimate how dumb almost everybody is. 2
leicsmac Posted 26 January 2025 Posted 26 January 2025 Trump buying into the idea of "Greater Israel" in all its rather dubious glory, then. Quelle surprise.
Parafox Posted 26 January 2025 Author Posted 26 January 2025 1 hour ago, Daggers said: Don't underestimate how dumb almost everybody is. As an example, I have friends (who both own their own businesses) who genuinely believe the furlough scheme was irresponsible and that those who lost jobs or were laid off were leeches on our economy who didn't deserve furlough payments. No doubt there were some, but can you imagine the impact on the majority who would now be on the benefits cycle? 2
Zear0 Posted 26 January 2025 Posted 26 January 2025 https://www.theguardian.com/world/2025/jan/26/belarus-presidential-election-alexander-lukashenko-on-course-win Hard fought campaign there Rex, well done mate. 1
Lionator Posted 26 January 2025 Posted 26 January 2025 5 hours ago, Sampson said: Seeing Rachel Reeves scramble round making the most un-Labour of economic changes - reducing benefits and reducing taxes on the wealthy and saying growth is more important than climate change while refusing to budge on rejoining the single market, showing that growth at all costs clearly doesn’t mean growth at all costs is depressing. I think uk is just completely ****ed economically though. Like it’s not just that the money just isn’t there, but it’s that’s there’s genuinely absolutely nothing any government could do to even help get the economy back on track. Genuinely feel like we have the same conditions as the Weimar Republic and the same metaphorical powder keg waiting to go off right now sadly. Isn’t our age disparity one of our main problems? Like we’ve never had so many economically inactive people and those people obviously cost the state an unprecedented amount in pension and healthcare costs?
Popular Post Sampson Posted 26 January 2025 Popular Post Posted 26 January 2025 (edited) 11 minutes ago, Lionator said: Isn’t our age disparity one of our main problems? Like we’ve never had so many economically inactive people and those people obviously cost the state an unprecedented amount in pension and healthcare costs? Yep and it’s something I’ve said many times on this forum many times . That Population ageing is one of the two greatest challenges of humanity this century along with climate change and we’re already seeing its impact in profound ways as states cannot economically support their ageing populations more and more. But at least politicians actually talk about climate change, they don’t even want to talk about population ageing, let alone deal with it, because by definition it’s telling a larger and larger swathe of the voting population that they’re too expensive for the state, and it’s way easier politically to blame economic problems all on immigrants and benefits scroungers. Edited 26 January 2025 by Sampson 6
Lionator Posted 26 January 2025 Posted 26 January 2025 3 minutes ago, Sampson said: Yep and it’s something I’ve said many times on this forum many times . That Population ageing is one of the two greatest challenges of this century along with climate change and we’re already seeing its impact in profound ways as states cannot economically support their ageing populations more and more. But at least politicians actually talk about climate change, they don’t even want to talk about population ageing, let alone deal with it, because by definition it’s telling a larger and larger swathe of the population that they’re too expensive for the state, and it’s way easier politically to blame economic problems all on immigrants and benefits scroungers. Especially as that population are the most politically active too. You saw the uproar with the winter fuel payment, any decision which affects older generations will lead to the government tanking at the next election. Boris Johnson was the only one who has addressed however I don’t think letting Covid rip through the older population was ever that ethical.
SpacedX Posted 26 January 2025 Posted 26 January 2025 10 minutes ago, Sampson said: That Population ageing is one of the two greatest challenges of humanity this century along with climate change And yet we've known about both for decades. The failure to act for so long is inexcusable.
Trav Le Bleu Posted 26 January 2025 Posted 26 January 2025 Trump Praises Starmers Leadership But what does he have to say about Aiyawatt's tenure?
Recommended Posts