Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
4 minutes ago, cityfanlee23 said:

Vardy is one of the main reasons we have a striker crisis and has been this way for many years. His inability to play in a proper 2 striker formation had held the club back from ever being able to actually replace him, often because the numbers he has put up has meant he justified his place as our only striker on the pitch for most of his time here, and whenever we did manage to shoehorn another striker in, they pretty much exclusively had to drop deep to supply Vardy. He should have retired/left 22/23. 

 

That's the painful one. If we're to move forward as a club it has to be without Vardy 

  • Like 1
Posted

Josh Low remains one of the most underutilised assets City have ever owned. Booted to appease the mob who were too stupid to appreciate what he could offer.

  • Haha 4
Posted
39 minutes ago, Samilktray said:

It’s the unpopular opinions thread, I’m sorry you disagree with my post but it’s an unpopular truth. 

I envy you if a couple of thousand people singing a song is the worst emotion you've had to do with supporting Leicester over the past few years. 

Posted (edited)
52 minutes ago, Bilo said:

Claude Puel only failed because he has the personality of a walnut.

 

This is an appalling take. 

 

He had absolutely no idea at all how to coach attacking football and his man management was no better than Rodgers (the whole Vardy saga was insane.)

 

Rodgers definitely benefited from inheriting Puel's defensive organisation and his tenure saw mostly solid recruitment but let's not fall in to Puel revisionism, he was a largely awful manager who had to go. 

 

What I would take would be an NFL style set up of Puel as defensive coordinator, Rodgers as offensive coordinator and Pearson as head coach. With Walsh as GM. 

 

Dynasty worthy that. 

 

Edited by Finnegan
  • Like 1
Posted
26 minutes ago, cityfanlee23 said:

Vardy is one of the main reasons we have a striker crisis and has been this way for many years. His inability to play in a proper 2 striker formation had held the club back from ever being able to actually replace him, often because the numbers he has put up has meant he justified his place as our only striker on the pitch for most of his time here, and whenever we did manage to shoehorn another striker in, they pretty much exclusively had to drop deep to supply Vardy. He should have retired/left 22/23. 

 

Agreed unpopular.

Please detail clubs who play with 2 up top these days

Posted
28 minutes ago, cityfanlee23 said:

Vardy is one of the main reasons we have a striker crisis and has been this way for many years. His inability to play in a proper 2 striker formation had held the club back from ever being able to actually replace him, often because the numbers he has put up has meant he justified his place as our only striker on the pitch for most of his time here, and whenever we did manage to shoehorn another striker in, they pretty much exclusively had to drop deep to supply Vardy. He should have retired/left 22/23. 

 

Here's a follow-on opinion that I don't think is unpopular but fills me with regret - the absolute best we've ever looked as a football team was when Rodgers played Vardy and Iheanacho up front together at Villa. Absolutely tore them apart that day with an old-fashioned 4-4-2.

 

Just imagine if he'd put his ego aside and used that as a blueprint. What if...

  • Like 4
Posted
7 minutes ago, Gamble92 said:

I envy you if a couple of thousand people singing a song is the worst emotion you've had to do with supporting Leicester over the past few years. 

I really dont know what else to say to you, thank you for confirming my unpopular opinion about LCFC is unpopular? lol

Posted
23 minutes ago, Electric Yetis said:

I have more affection for the squad of 91-97 than any of the 15/16 squad.

Is 91-97 a typo? That's not a squad is it.

From a quick glance the only 3 players present in 91-92 and 96-97 were Poole, Whitlow and Willis

Posted
2 hours ago, bovril said:

Lloyd Dyer wasn't very good. Though he was quite effective.

 

1 hour ago, Stadt said:

Okazaki wasn't very good

 

:o;)

 

How do you define "very good" in this context? 

 

I'd see it as a synonym for "effective", which makes Bovril's claim particularly problematic.

If it's used as a synonym for "skilful", I'd agree with both statements.

 

Dyer:

- Good: Pace, work rate

- Medium: Erratic shooting/finishing/crossing (both scored & missed plenty in Championship), basic passing, ok dribbling

- Bad: Close control ball skills

- Overall: Good upper Championship player 2009-14

 

Okazaki:

- Good: Pressing, positional awareness, work rate, team leader by example

- Medium: Erratic finishing, basic passing

- Bad: Close control, dribbling

- Overall: Key man in a peculiar & somewhat effective team 2015-16

 

Put prime Dyer in the current squad and he might be a useful sub for last 20 mins in PL (less so than in 14-15, as defending & fitness levels have risen). Possibly still a starter in Championship.

Put prime Shinji in the current squad and we stay up this season! :thumbup:

 

 

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...