Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content
 Share
mod hero

EOS awards vote

By mod hero, in Leicester City Forum

Recommended Posts

  • Popular Post
BeaumontFox

BeaumontFox

Posted
  • Popular Post
Posted

Forcing the women’s team on this form is just going to result in random selections.

 

That list of men’s goals for goal of the season… could it be much smaller!?

  • Like 6
davieG

davieG

Posted
Posted

Another example of the club being out of touch and out of reality.

 

Just wanted to vote Vardy and El K as I have insufficient idea of how the women played but will not bother to vote now.

 

Their loss another wedge planted between the club and I.

  • Like 2
StanSP

StanSP

Posted
Posted
12 minutes ago, davieG said:

Another example of the club being out of touch and out of reality.

 

Just wanted to vote Vardy and El K as I have insufficient idea of how the women played but will not bother to vote now.

 

Their loss another wedge planted between the club and I.

You still can vote for them?

 

Just pick a random player for the women's... 

davieG

davieG

Posted
Posted
5 minutes ago, StanSP said:

You still can vote for them?

 

Just pick a random player for the women's... 

I refuse to add to and support their charade 

  • Sad 1
dmayne7

dmayne7

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, BeaumontFox said:

Forcing the women’s team on this form is just going to result in random selections.

 

That list of men’s goals for goal of the season… could it be much smaller!?

Happens every year with the women's team. Ridiculous

dmayne7

dmayne7

Posted
Posted
26 minutes ago, BeaumontFox said:

It’s not fair on the ladies. Most of us have no clue about their game.

That's what I mean. I have a cursory glance at their results and know the names of a few but that's my knowledge, so it just undermines that vote. Bet 50% of votes will be random at least, and probably most of those for the first couple  of names.

fox_favourite

fox_favourite

Posted
Posted (edited)
10 minutes ago, dmayne7 said:

That's what I mean. I have a cursory glance at their results and know the names of a few but that's my knowledge, so it just undermines that vote. Bet 50% of votes will be random at least, and probably most of those for the first couple  of names.

Problem is, could you imagine the backlash if they didn't include them at the same time as the mens?

Edited by fox_favourite
Xen

Xen

Posted
Posted

Stupid that every category is required, and they're all bundled together.

 

Arguably no 'good' answer for the mens votes, and it's not fair on the women's vote.

 

I would've put down an obvious p-taking vote for Soumare/Skipp/etc, but don't want to negatively affect the women's EOS vote, so just wont vote instead.

  • Like 1
FoxesTez

FoxesTez

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, fox_favourite said:

Problem is, could you imagine the backlash if they didn't include them at the same time as the mens?

There’s no issue having the voting and awards at the same time, but the voting should absolutely be optional. 

Xen

Xen

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, fox_favourite said:

Problem is, could you imagine the backlash if they didn't include them at the same time as the mens?

Easy solution is to just make it so they're not required fields... Sure, you'll still get some people voting at random even though they dont have to, but better than the current setup

fox_favourite

fox_favourite

Posted
Posted (edited)
2 minutes ago, FoxesTez said:

There’s no issue having the voting and awards at the same time, but the voting should absolutely be optional. 

Oh my bad, I didn't realise it was required. Then yes, I retract my statement.

 

I'm just not even voting or clicking on the link. 

Edited by fox_favourite
davieG

davieG

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, fox_favourite said:

Problem is, could you imagine the backlash if they didn't include them at the same time as the mens?

How about two voting options?

 

They're trying to increase interest in the women's game but it's a false premise and more likely to alienate fans. This a fundamental problem with the women's game they're trying so hard to mirror the men's game, which is hardly ideal but it's mostly false. It should have been allowed to grow organically. If it is deemed to be as popular as they think then that should work.

davieG

davieG

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, Bob Weasel Fox said:

I'm voting for Missy Goodwin :whistle:

I'm sure you're jesting, well maybe but this is the potential result of forced voting.

 

 

Sol thewall Bamba

Sol thewall Bamba

Posted
Posted
49 minutes ago, Freeman's Wharfer said:

Hilarious they’ve taken out the likes of Ward and Edouard from the options for men’s player of the year yet still have Fatawu in there.

His one man demolition of Southampton probably gave the fans the best moment of the season tbf. That's worth including him.

filbertway

filbertway

Posted
Posted

Genuinely brain dead to force a vote for the women's.

 

Both are just gonna be people picking one at random for a laugh lol

 

Harsh on the women though, hundreds of genuine votes is better than thousands making a random choice.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...