Flynny Posted 1 September 2007 Posted 1 September 2007 Anyone still listening? The yhhhhmean guys back!
Frenzied Posted 1 September 2007 Posted 1 September 2007 By the sounds of it they didn't play with any passion, and I feel that MA would have brought some of that passion so MM isn't convincing me with his decision just yet. I have a feeling MM is planning on recruiting a new manager.
Bryn Posted 1 September 2007 Posted 1 September 2007 Anyone still listening?The yhhhhmean guys back! Oh please God no, I've got a delay on the stream so I have that to look forward to...
Thracian Posted 1 September 2007 Posted 1 September 2007 1st rule of a successful team - win at home and don't lose away. Good result.And considering the past week... Must be your rule book but seeing we lost at home to Blackpool, the theory is not holding up and we're now likely to be five points off the pace after four matches having failed to score in half of them. It's no use having the players if you don't give them the freedom to play.
hebangsthedrums Posted 1 September 2007 Posted 1 September 2007 Must be your rule book but seeing we lost at home to Blackpool, the theory is not holding up and we're now likely to be five points off the pace after four matches having failed to score in half of them.It's no use having the players if you don't let em play. ?
hebangsthedrums Posted 1 September 2007 Posted 1 September 2007 Where the hell are all these imbeciles coming from who are asking for Warnock? This guys sounds like hes had a lobotomy.
Ajax Treesdown Posted 1 September 2007 Posted 1 September 2007 Bloke just said "Milan is only in it for the money"........no shite sherlock.
Steven Posted 1 September 2007 Posted 1 September 2007 So i guess Beaglehole decided against his magical attacking free flowing football today then? No shots on target, oh dear. Oh well, take the point and run. An opportunity lost for him especially as he has nothing to lose.
filbertway Posted 1 September 2007 Posted 1 September 2007 I'll take a point, don't know what the team was or how we played though. Coalville won 3-2
Thracian Posted 1 September 2007 Posted 1 September 2007 ? You heard how we were standing off people and defending deep. That's a sure sign our defenders are too slow and know it. Our only attacking midfielder was forced to play full-back and after that there was no way slow defenders like N'Gotty, Kisnorbo and McAuley were ever going to support the remaining two midfielders in any forward movement. Our final problem was not having three up front because we were always going to be limited to scraps and Porter was always going to be isolated from the game with lack of close and numerical support.
dandannieldanok Posted 1 September 2007 Posted 1 September 2007 You might be right but how long are people going to come out with these endless excuses for our failure to have a go?What was the reason against Blackpool first half? Or Accrington. And why did we funnel back on defence at Palace in the closing stages? Or barely have a kick for the first half-hour at Notingham? And you moan at MM for sacking Martin Allen...........??
Lord Nibblington Posted 1 September 2007 Posted 1 September 2007 A point is an ok result, but from the sounds of it, the performance was quite worrying. Shall be interested to hear the opinions of those who went to the game.
davieG Posted 1 September 2007 Posted 1 September 2007 Significant points of the game: .......................................................................................... .................................................................. The end. Well there was One significant point.
Matt Posted 1 September 2007 Posted 1 September 2007 Take it there's no interview? Come on Milan, do your post match manager interview...You know you wanna, You do everything else but!
lookwhaticando Posted 1 September 2007 Author Posted 1 September 2007 .......................................................................................... .................................................................. I count 156 points.
Frenzied Posted 1 September 2007 Posted 1 September 2007 Must be your rule book but seeing we lost at home to Blackpool, the theory is not holding up and we're now likely to be five points off the pace after four matches having failed to score in half of them.It's no use having the players if you don't give them the freedom to play. The rule is a general one. Of course we'll lose some at home and hopefully win enough away. (Can't believe there's not a praying smiley) But my point was that a draw away from home at Plymouth (considering the past week) was a good result. We've had a short Allen era, we have no manager and still a great deal of expectation, and a whole season ahead.
hebangsthedrums Posted 1 September 2007 Posted 1 September 2007 You heard how we were standing off people and defending deep. That's a sure sign our defenders are too slow and know it.Our only attacking midfielder was forced to play full-back and after that there was no way slow defenders like N'Gotty, Kisnorbo and McAuley were ever going to support the remaining two midfielders in any forward movement. Our final problem was not having three up front because we were always going to be limited to scraps and Porter was always going to be isolated from the game with lack of close and numerical support. Yes but you said no good having the players if you don't play them. Who from the available (ie not out on loan ) players would you have put in instead?
Matt Posted 1 September 2007 Posted 1 September 2007 Take it there's no interview?Come on Milan, do your post match manager interview...You know you wanna, You do everything else but! Just said on RL Jon Rudkin interview in a minute. I want the manager MM to do it though!
Bert Posted 1 September 2007 Posted 1 September 2007 It was a good point, we kept a clean sheet at a place where we're known not to play well, maybe we didn't set the world on fire with our performance, but we didn't lose.
filbertway Posted 1 September 2007 Posted 1 September 2007 Managerless Leicester draw 0-0 with Plymouth. We haven't got any players suitable for hoofing other than Cort, certainly not MDV. Why do people say on the one hand he can't head the ball and then say if we're going to hoof it play MDV - this is not aimed at you filbert I didn't have chance to respond to this in the other thread so brough it over here . When we "Hoof" it with DJ and Hume up top, they're not really capable of getting the ball on their chest and holding it up, if theres one thing MDV is good at, it's getting the ball and holding it up. That's what I meant when I said if we're going to hoof it we may as well have him on, at least he would be the target and we wouldnt have long balls going to centre backs marking DJ or Hume.
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.