Asha Posted 22 December 2007 Posted 22 December 2007 what a waste he was! I think he was injured more than carl cort! He was scored 3 goals or something stupid.
Kilworthfox Posted 22 December 2007 Posted 22 December 2007 He was scored 3 goals or something stupid. Cort has scored 1 and that was in the cup! He does not look like scoring any more if you ask me. Maybe today seing as he is playing Wolves. Eadie was a good player unfortunately he got injured, you cannot blame him at all. It would be like blaming Jones or Piper.
Father Ted Posted 22 December 2007 Posted 22 December 2007 kasper shameichal would do Not a bad shout at all, Is he still on loan at Cardiff?
Jonezy Posted 22 December 2007 Posted 22 December 2007 I believe Marci will not leave us before January now, and with Ollie sending Nielsen home, it could look like we will have a proper go at signing him for real. Only worry is, that a richer club has got their eyes on him too, but hopefully Ollie bringing in some Hungarian talent could turn the tide in our favour. Please dont go Marci!!!!
Free Falling Foxes Posted 22 December 2007 Posted 22 December 2007 what a waste he (Eadie) was! I think he was injured more than carl cort! I could never understand that - he had a history of injuries when we signed him! His chairman at Norwich said, when they sold him: 'He's someone elses problem now!' So it proved. FFF
Jonezy Posted 22 December 2007 Posted 22 December 2007 Marci? Thats what the Hungarian guy called him a few days ago, and he was a huge fan of Fulop.
filbertstreetboy Posted 22 December 2007 Posted 22 December 2007 plymouths keeper is out of contract in the summer,mabey we could get him on the cheap in jan???
Trav Le Bleu Posted 22 December 2007 Posted 22 December 2007 The City manager wants to clear the way, and the wage bill, for new faces he has his eye on - and he has learned he could face competition for one of his prime targets, Sunderland goalkeeper Marton Fulop.The Hungarian keeper is on a season-long loan which was always rated as pending a permanent move. But Sunderland manager Roy Keane is considering recalling Fulop when the transfer window opens because City might not be the only interested party. This surprise move is possible because of a “gentlemen's agreement†when Allen did the deal. Holloway, though, said: “We will not have a gun to our heads but we hope we can sign him. “He likes us and we like him - and he might also like what we are going to do ourselves in the transfer market.†Fulop will take his place in the City side at Wolves this evening behind a line-up which is expected to show few, if any, changes from the side that lost at Hull last week. www.thebluearmy.co.uk If this is the case, that there is a "gentlemans agreement", then it surely between Allen and Keane, and Allen isn't here any more! Beside, as I understand it, a gentleman's agreement isn't worth the paper that it isn't written on, so Keane has no valid grounds.
davieG Posted 22 December 2007 Posted 22 December 2007 If this is the case, that there is a "gentlemans agreement", then it surely between Allen and Keane, and Allen isn't here any more! Beside, as I understand it, a gentleman's agreement isn't worth the paper that it isn't written on, so Keane has no valid grounds. I think the whole point is that it's not written on paper and as for Allen well he made this 'agreement' on behalf of the club and it therefore should be honoured otherwise other clubs will no longer want to do buisness with us. Your attitude reflects what is wrong with professional football and society in general absolutely no integrity. Would you adopt the same attitude if it was you involved?
Trav Le Bleu Posted 22 December 2007 Posted 22 December 2007 No - a gentleman's agreement is an unwritten understanding between 2 people, nothing more. If anyone is being underhanded it is Keane - the reason the gentleman's agreement there was no doubt in the case of Sunderland having BOTH their first and secomnd choice keepers out, NOT because their third choice turned out to be actually quite good. The gentleman's agreement is verbal - the loan contract which says he is here until the end of the season is far more legally binding. It is what Keane is doing that is morally wrong and lacking in integrity. He has no need of Fulop, just wants the quick buck. It's like a kid who bored with his christmas presents and sees the poor kid in the street playing with a toy he discarded earlier and pinching it back, and saying "yeah, but, remember I said you could have it but..."
davieG Posted 22 December 2007 Posted 22 December 2007 No - a gentleman's agreement is an unwritten understanding between 2 people, nothing more.If anyone is being underhanded it is Keane - the reason the gentleman's agreement there was no doubt in the case of Sunderland having BOTH their first and secomnd choice keepers out, NOT because their third choice turned out to be actually quite good. The gentleman's agreement is verbal - the loan contract which says he is here until the end of the season is far more legally binding. It is what Keane is doing that is morally wrong. It's like a kid who bored with his christmas presents and sees the poor kid in the street playing with a toy he discarded earlier and pinching it back, and saying "yeah, but, remember I said you could have it but..." Unwritten - That's what I said !! As for the details of this Gentleman's agreement you or I have no idea what it was about or what it involvde so how you can even consider commenting on who is right or wrong I have no idea. No one has said that it's being misinterpreted or misused they've just said it exists and Keene is taking it up. Written or unwritten it's still an agreement so should be upheld.
Babylon Posted 22 December 2007 Posted 22 December 2007 Written or unwritten it's still an agreement so should be upheld. Especially if you believe reports we are after two other players of theirs on loan, along with Fulop Permanently.
Trav Le Bleu Posted 22 December 2007 Posted 22 December 2007 Unwritten - That's what I said !! Yup! But I said it first in my original post - "not worth the paper it isn't written on"
C.J Posted 22 December 2007 Posted 22 December 2007 Blimey, 14 pages in just over a day. This forum doesnt half move quick does it? Im suprised there isnt a topic specticulating about the weather somwhere- Anyway, Cant be bothered reading the other 14 pages but I think the price will be a couple of million for Fullop when and if he comes available.
Blue Bob Posted 22 December 2007 Posted 22 December 2007 No - a gentleman's agreement is an unwritten understanding between 2 people, nothing more.If anyone is being underhanded it is Keane - the reason the gentleman's agreement there was no doubt in the case of Sunderland having BOTH their first and secomnd choice keepers out, NOT because their third choice turned out to be actually quite good. The gentleman's agreement is verbal - the loan contract which says he is here until the end of the season is far more legally binding. It is what Keane is doing that is morally wrong and lacking in integrity. He has no need of Fulop, just wants the quick buck. It's like a kid who bored with his christmas presents and sees the poor kid in the street playing with a toy he discarded earlier and pinching it back, and saying "yeah, but, remember I said you could have it but..." I am not entirely sure that we can blame Keane, I believe he is only doing what he thinks is the best for Sunderland and quite simply that is his job!! If he thinks he has an asset that he can sell to improve his side so they stay in the premiership can you really blame him. I think he has give us a clear message ... If you want Fulop you need to buy him in January or he will be going elsewhere. Whats wrong with that?? Milan just needs to get out his check book and secure his services, something we have all been saying for sometime.
stevie909 Posted 22 December 2007 Posted 22 December 2007 anyone hear what was said on bbc leicester? barber reckons keane is just stalling to get more cash off us. i know he's not a reliable source but still...all may not be lost oh, if he does go, we're foccaciad
CupidStunt Posted 22 December 2007 Posted 22 December 2007 If he wants decent money,then i reckon MM should put his hand in his pocket Like Ollie says,we wont be held to ransom,but i do want to sign him All good teams start at the back,and we need him
Simi Posted 22 December 2007 Posted 22 December 2007 The fans certainly made it clear today that they still want Fulop hear. He came over to clap at the end and got a massive ovation.
Thracian Posted 22 December 2007 Posted 22 December 2007 If he wants decent money,then i reckon MM should put his hand in his pocketLike Ollie says,we wont be held to ransom,but i do want to sign him All good teams start at the back,and we need him It's not as if he's played a few blinders and dropped a few clangers. The guy looks rock solid dependable. No frills, dominates in the air without fuss. Just what any team wants. If the price is anything like sensible we should pay it and use him as the keystone for our team. At least we know what we're getting which is more than was the case with so many of our summer signings.
Bryn Posted 22 December 2007 Posted 22 December 2007 It's not as if he's played a few blinders and dropped a few clangers. The guy looks rock solid dependable. No frills, dominates in the air without fuss. Just what any team wants. If the price is anything like sensible we should pay it and use him as the keystone for our team.At least we know what we're getting which is more than was the case with so many of our summer signings. He's only 24 as well ain't he? Could last us years.
Raj Posted 23 December 2007 Posted 23 December 2007 I aint reading all these pages...but He is going back to Sunderland in Jan isnt he??? And we are getting Logan back??
Trav Le Bleu Posted 23 December 2007 Posted 23 December 2007 I aint reading all these pages...but He is going back to Sunderland in Jan isnt he???And we are getting Logan back?? Yes Raj, that's the long and short of it... No, wait...
Thracian Posted 23 December 2007 Posted 23 December 2007 He's only 24 as well ain't he? Could last us years. Could last longer than us if we have any more signings like the summer ones.
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.