maddog Posted 2 February 2008 Posted 2 February 2008 This is the reason why Leicester keep getting poor results. Ollie is constantly moaning about having little options and players playing out of position. He gets some more options and carries on playing players totally out of position. What the hell is he doing? Anyold person would know that if a player is a right back you play him at right back, a striker, you play him up front. Ollie keeps moaning, and keeps being a hypocrit and playing players out of position, it's just baffling. Hume was fantastic against Cov up front, his actual position, so what does Ollie do? Plays Hume right wing against Palace and he was fooking awful. We have other options now, Bori can play on both wings and was great when he came on against Palace, yet he just sits on the bench until the last 5 minutes today while Hayles and Hume play on the wings. It's just a joke The biggest folly of Ollie's today though was left back. We have just signed the left back Clapham who was nowhere to be seen today and we obviously have Mattock, and supposedly too many left backs now so we let Shush! go out on loan. What does Ollie do? He puts a fooking right back in left back position. Chambers has been good this season at right back, he gets forward, and makes tackles yet he always seemed to be behind Stearman in the pecking order. Credit to Stearman who has been better recently but Chambers has been good too. A right back at left back when we have left backs now, strikers on the wings who obviously can't play there when they are both playing well up front and we have the Hungarian wingers now. Stop playing players out of position Ollie, or just stop moaning about square pegs in round holes when you keep hammering those pegs in! Im starting to wonder if Ollie is right for our club now. Ill judge him after the first 10 games of next season and see where we are then, whether in league 1 or the Championship
Steven Posted 2 February 2008 Posted 2 February 2008 Stop playing players out of position Ollie, or just stop moaning about square pegs in round holes when you keep hammering those pegs in! IH talks the talk.
Bryn Posted 2 February 2008 Posted 2 February 2008 There is absolutely nothing to suggest that Ollie's changes cost us the game. Indeed, from what the radio said (which is never a good source but hey if you can do it I can), we started to dominate after IH's halftime changes.
James. Posted 2 February 2008 Posted 2 February 2008 Hume really shouldn't be playing on the right wing.
Tommy G Posted 2 February 2008 Posted 2 February 2008 This is the reason why Leicester keep getting poor results.Ollie is constantly moaning about having little options and players playing out of position. He gets some more options and carries on playing players totally out of position. What the hell is he doing? Anyold person would know that if a player is a right back you play him at right back, a striker, you play him up front. Ollie keeps moaning, and keeps being a hypocrit and playing players out of position, it's just baffling. Hume was fantastic against Cov up front, his actual position, so what does Ollie do? Plays Hume right wing against Palace and he was fooking awful. We have other options now, Bori can play on both wings and was great when he came on against Palace, yet he just sits on the bench until the last 5 minutes today while Hayles and Hume play on the wings. It's just a joke The biggest folly of Ollie's today though was left back. We have just signed the left back Clapham who was nowhere to be seen today and we obviously have Mattock, and supposedly too many left backs now so we let Shush! go out on loan. What does Ollie do? He puts a fooking right back in left back position. Chambers has been good this season at right back, he gets forward, and makes tackles yet he always seemed to be behind Stearman in the pecking order. Credit to Stearman who has been better recently but Chambers has been good too. A right back at left back when we have left backs now, strikers on the wings who obviously can't play there when they are both playing well up front and we have the Hungarian wingers now. Stop playing players out of position Ollie, or just stop moaning about square pegs in round holes when you keep hammering those pegs in! Im starting to wonder if Ollie is right for our club now. Ill judge him after the first 10 games of next season and see where we are then, whether in league 1 or the Championship Basically a flowered up ''Ollie Out'' rant? I agree with the players out of position bit, but there must be reasons why Bori couldn't play? Perhaps he is unfit? Your not the manager so therefore you don't know what goes on behind the scenes! Oh and Chambers can play left back you tool. He's a versatile player, slightly better at RB though which is his best position.
maddog Posted 2 February 2008 Author Posted 2 February 2008 There is absolutely nothing to suggest that Ollie's changes cost us the game. Indeed, from what the radio said (which is never a good source but hey if you can do it I can), we started to dominate after IH's halftime changes. There is obviously an element of luck involved when you just throw players on totally out of position and start to dominate, and however well we dominated we lost. Just play players in the right positions and ill be happy. I don't see Wenger, Ferguson, Redknapp, Grant playing anyone out of position, so why is Ollie doing it?
Bluemoon Posted 2 February 2008 Posted 2 February 2008 This is the reason why Leicester keep getting poor results.Ollie is constantly moaning about having little options and players playing out of position. He gets some more options and carries on playing players totally out of position. What the hell is he doing? Anyold person would know that if a player is a right back you play him at right back, a striker, you play him up front. Ollie keeps moaning, and keeps being a hypocrit and playing players out of position, it's just baffling. Hume was fantastic against Cov up front, his actual position, so what does Ollie do? Plays Hume right wing against Palace and he was fooking awful. We have other options now, Bori can play on both wings and was great when he came on against Palace, yet he just sits on the bench until the last 5 minutes today while Hayles and Hume play on the wings. It's just a joke The biggest folly of Ollie's today though was left back. We have just signed the left back Clapham who was nowhere to be seen today and we obviously have Mattock, and supposedly too many left backs now so we let Shush! go out on loan. What does Ollie do? He puts a fooking right back in left back position. Chambers has been good this season at right back, he gets forward, and makes tackles yet he always seemed to be behind Stearman in the pecking order. Credit to Stearman who has been better recently but Chambers has been good too. A right back at left back when we have left backs now, strikers on the wings who obviously can't play there when they are both playing well up front and we have the Hungarian wingers now. Stop playing players out of position Ollie, or just stop moaning about square pegs in round holes when you keep hammering those pegs in! Perhaps there is dressing room politics being played, and this could explain his bizarre selections and tactics. We all assume that all the squad problems have been solved by getting rid of players, but I somehow doubt it. The problem was very deeply rooted and has showed itself with older players complaining about the wages of new recruits.
James. Posted 2 February 2008 Posted 2 February 2008 There is obviously an element of luck involved when you just throw players on totally out of position and start to dominate, and however well we dominated we lost.Just play players in the right positions and ill be happy. I don't see Wenger, Ferguson, Redknapp, Grant playing anyone out of position, so why is Ollie doing it? Oh dear.
maddog Posted 2 February 2008 Author Posted 2 February 2008 Basically a flowered up ''Ollie Out'' rant? I agree with the players out of position bit, but there must be reasons why Bori couldn't play? Perhaps he is unfit? Your not the manager so therefore you don't know what goes on behind the scenes!Oh and Chambers can play left back you tool. He's a versatile player, slightly better at RB though which is his best position. Im not hinting at Ollie out one bit your also a tool. I just don't want him playing players out of position there are no excuses for it. An unfit Bori or a fully fit Hume at right wing. Id choose Bori every time and i don't even think Bori is unfit.
Hugo Sanchez Posted 2 February 2008 Posted 2 February 2008 Basically a flowered up ''Ollie Out'' rant? I agree with the players out of position bit, but there must be reasons why Bori couldn't play? Perhaps he is unfit? Your not the manager so therefore you don't know what goes on behind the scenes!Oh and Chambers can play left back you tool. He's a versatile player, slightly better at RB though which is his best position. Still if your 1-0 down at half time, why change the left back ? Clapham was suppose to be in the squad today but wasn't. James Chambers isn't a very good left back and BTW and thats on me watching him play there. Nothing has been reported on Bori being unfit. So he can only go with the information he's got.
Tommy G Posted 2 February 2008 Posted 2 February 2008 There is obviously an element of luck involved when you just throw players on totally out of position and start to dominate, and however well we dominated we lost.Just play players in the right positions and ill be happy. I don't see Wenger, Ferguson, Redknapp, Grant playing anyone out of position, so why is Ollie doing it? Haha this really does prove you a tool who doesn't know what they are talking about. The managers mentioned above have SLIGHTLY more resources than us at this present time. Therefore can buy perhaps 3 players that play in each position that are all very good.
Tommy G Posted 2 February 2008 Posted 2 February 2008 Still if your 1-0 down at half time, why change the left back ? Clapham was suppose to be in the squad today but wasn't. James Chambers isn't a very good left back and BTW and thats on me watching him play there. Nothing has been reported on Bori being unfit. So he can only go with the information he's got. Boring. Chambers is attacking, has pace and is more experienced than the wonderkid himself Joe Mattock. Ollies changes at half time (out of position or not) changed the game and got us back into it! Some sloppy defending at the end cost us.
maddog Posted 2 February 2008 Author Posted 2 February 2008 Boring.Chambers is attacking, has pace and is more experienced than the wonderkid himself Joe Mattock. Ollies changes at half time (out of position or not) changed the game and got us back into it! Some sloppy defending at the end cost us. You don't know that and neither do i. You weren't at the game, i weren't at the game lets see what people at the game have got to say. All i know from not being at the game is that Hume was on right wing again after playing fooking awful there against Palace and amazing up front against Cov
holly Posted 2 February 2008 Posted 2 February 2008 Im not hinting at Ollie out one bit your also a tool.I just don't want him playing players out of position there are no excuses for it. An unfit Bori or a fully fit Hume at right wing. Id choose Bori every time and i don't even think Bori is unfit. are you not aware than before hume came to us he was an attacking right winger?? obviously ur not up to date with that fact...therefore not being played out of position, just a position he obivously isnt wanting to play these days
maddog Posted 2 February 2008 Author Posted 2 February 2008 are you not aware than before hume came to us he was an attacking right winger?? obviously ur not up to date with that fact...therefore not being played out of position, just a position he obivously isnt wanting to play these days Why are you all making excuses for Ollie putting players out of position. Hume was fooking awful right wing against Palace and poor there all season when hes played there no arguments. So why is he playing there again today? I just can't be arsed with you strange people anymore
Hugo Sanchez Posted 2 February 2008 Posted 2 February 2008 are you not aware than before hume came to us he was an attacking right winger?? obviously ur not up to date with that fact...therefore not being played out of position, just a position he obivously isnt wanting to play these days Hume was playing up front for Tranmere when he came here. Levein brought him to replace Connolly.
Jimmy Posted 2 February 2008 Posted 2 February 2008 It's a myth that Chambers has played well at right back as he's played there about 3 times ALL SEASON
Matt Posted 2 February 2008 Posted 2 February 2008 Maddog and others moaning about Ollie, Will you be phoning Radio Leicester on Monday night during the phone in? Because Ollie is in the studio on Monday, Just wondering if you are willing to talk the talk against Ollie?!
holly Posted 2 February 2008 Posted 2 February 2008 Why are you all making excuses for Ollie putting players out of position. Hume was fooking awful right wing against Palace and poor there all season when hes played there no arguments. So why is he playing there again today? I just can't be arsed with you strange people anymore if you cant be bothered then dont come on and moan, and then not like it when people have different opinions to u! he hasnt played there all season for 1, holloway obviously puts him there for a reason so let him just get on with his job and support the decisions he makes.
grth2004 Posted 2 February 2008 Posted 2 February 2008 i like ollie but i must say after going to the palace game on monday a came away thinking hume had a awful game , and thats the first time ive thought that of hume , he just doesnt look happy playing out of position
Hugo Sanchez Posted 2 February 2008 Posted 2 February 2008 if you cant be bothered then dont come on and moan, and then not like it when people have different opinions to u! he hasnt played there all season for 1, holloway obviously puts him there for a reason so let him just get on with his job and support the decisions he makes. YEA LETS DO THAT ! Worked wonders with Peter taylor
Babylon Posted 2 February 2008 Posted 2 February 2008 What a bunch of Muppets... 7 points from 9 and it's "ooh we're great", lose against blackpool in the last minute and you're all on suicide watch again. Get a fooking grip.
Hugo Sanchez Posted 2 February 2008 Posted 2 February 2008 What a bunch of Muppets... 7 points from 9 and it's "ooh we're great", lose against blackpool in the last minute and you're all on suicide watch again.Get a fooking grip. LEAGUE TABLES DON'T LIE YOU FOOL ! Bet you where one of them morons who was going on about the playoffs after the Palace game wasn't you ? I be happy if we can just stay up.
Samilktray Posted 2 February 2008 Posted 2 February 2008 LEAGUE TABLES DON'T LIE YOU FOOL ! Bet you where one of them morons who was going on about the playoffs after the Palace game wasn't you ? I be happy if we can just stay up. Why do you keep assuming people have been saying things? Unless you have evidence to say theyve said we can challenge for the play offs etc. Then youve no right to say theyve said it.
Hugo Sanchez Posted 2 February 2008 Posted 2 February 2008 Why do you keep assuming people have been saying things?Unless you have evidence to say theyve said we can challenge for the play offs etc. Then youve no right to say theyve said it. There's two thread on about the playoffs last week ! Today in live chat after we scored people were going on about how many games we need to win to reach the playoffs but the biggest moron in all of this. Is Holloway he has give our fans false hope by saying we are still going for the playoffs. If we do go down, i will never forget what he said.
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.