FanofFilbert Posted 4 May 2011 Posted 4 May 2011 Just saw nick clegg on the liverpool echo website at walkers, new signing?? Sorry if been previously posted, cursory glance at website suggested it had not linky: http://www.liverpoolecho.co.uk/multimedia/news/national-news/video/2011/05/04/clegg-s-last-ditch-plea-for-av-100252-28636652/
wattolcfc Posted 4 May 2011 Posted 4 May 2011 Saw it on the news.. not happy that CVNT was allowed in our sacred ground!
leicesterseddon Posted 4 May 2011 Posted 4 May 2011 Not strange. Important by-election in Leicester South tomorrow. Obviously.
wattolcfc Posted 4 May 2011 Posted 4 May 2011 Bi-election.. is that where they choose which bisexual members they want in the houses of parliament??
Fosse Boy Posted 4 May 2011 Posted 4 May 2011 Saw it on the news.. not happy that CVNT was allowed in our sacred ground! Calm down, he wasn't at Filbert Street.
FanofFilbert Posted 4 May 2011 Author Posted 4 May 2011 New keeper think svens getting a bit desperate Probably sign contract then change his mind after cashing the singing on fee
lcfc"weasel" Posted 4 May 2011 Posted 4 May 2011 Get that **** away from anything to do with our club, absolute willy puller.
Tom17LCFC Posted 4 May 2011 Posted 4 May 2011 ewwwww. i'm voting no plainly because this cvnt is campaigning yes.
Craig Posted 4 May 2011 Posted 4 May 2011 ewwwww. i'm voting no plainly because this cvnt is campaigning yes. The irony of that statement being that if we'd actually got the AV system in place for the last election we probably wouldn't have a coalition government, which more than likely means that Clegg wouldn't be anywhere near as significant a figure as he is currently.
Tom17LCFC Posted 4 May 2011 Posted 4 May 2011 The irony of that statement being that if we'd actually got the AV system in place for the last election we probably wouldn't have a coalition government, which more than likely means that Clegg wouldn't be anywhere near as significant a figure as he is currently. I don't understand the whole ins and outs of it, but from what I gather surely having the AV system in place would be beneficial (if only slightly) to the Lib Dems, and words can't describe my hate for them.
Libertine Posted 4 May 2011 Posted 4 May 2011 The irony of that statement being that if we'd actually got the AV system in place for the last election we probably wouldn't have a coalition government, which more than likely means that Clegg wouldn't be anywhere near as significant a figure as he is currently. Yes we would, but a Lab/Lib one most likely.
bmt Posted 4 May 2011 Posted 4 May 2011 The irony of that statement being that if we'd actually got the AV system in place for the last election we probably wouldn't have a coalition government, which more than likely means that Clegg wouldn't be anywhere near as significant a figure as he is currently. http://www.electoral-reform.org.uk/blog/?p=36 Above shows projected votes if AV was used and also Single Transferable vote. Still wouldn't of been a majority so a coalition is still the likeliest of outcomes, although probably labour and lib dems rater than conservatives and lib dems.
ajthefox Posted 4 May 2011 Posted 4 May 2011 he's stood near my bloody seat! Probably nabbing your prawn sandwiches In all seriousness though nothing Nick Clegg says anymore has any credence at all. Not an ounce. Ever. How he can even take himself seriously is beyond me. Wouldn't piss on the cvnt if he was on fire. Oh and one more thing, don't step foot in the walkers again you bellend.
Craig Posted 4 May 2011 Posted 4 May 2011 Whilst that probably gives a good indication, it's by no means certain. Even in a labour-lib dem coalition I doubt there would be as much spotlight or emphasis put upon Clegg as there is now because the parties seem(ed) far more compatible than the two we have now, meaning that Clegg wouldn't have backtracked as much and wouldn't be so fiercely despised by some people.
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.