BlueSi13 Posted 20 August 2011 Posted 20 August 2011 oh and at the pathetic man city dance you lot were actually thinking youre a big club for a second there Still don't want to take time out in your busy schedule to explain the curry remark then? I hope you change your mind, im genuinely interested in your reasoning for that post?
MC Prussian Posted 20 August 2011 Posted 20 August 2011 Ha ha ha ha justice was done !!! Weren't you rabble singing 2-0 on yer big day out as well .. Fooking mugs haha I thought you were one of the more civilized F€@4t fans? Nice to see you living up to your fellow fans' stereotype. Homo erectus suits you fine.
Babylon Posted 20 August 2011 Posted 20 August 2011 Still don't want to take time out in your busy schedule to explain the curry remark then? I hope you change your mind, im genuinely interested in your reasoning for that post? He'll have a job, they are both banned.
Guest shearfox Posted 20 August 2011 Posted 20 August 2011 and what were you thinking at 2-0 and getting out classed by tiny old Leicester? A crappy penalty decision got you a point and you know it. A home draw after a poor performance and a massive slice of luck, I certainly wouldn't be happy....
Salieri Posted 20 August 2011 Posted 20 August 2011 Spiderpig your lot pissed me off today that's all had a bit of a run in with a few of your lot after. Needless to say I made it to the boozer don't think they did!!!! Spiderpig your lot pissed me off today that's all had a bit of a run in with a few of your lot after. Needless to say I made it to the boozer don't think they did!!!! Pissed you off how? By singing songs like " 2-0 on yer big day out"? And Forest fans wouldn't have been singing the same? So there were a few handbags afterwards were there?
Guest Bilo Posted 20 August 2011 Posted 20 August 2011 oh dear oh dear £10 million pounds spent and you cant win at the famous city ground we were very poor in the first half but give credit to our guys, we stuck in there disgraceful timewasting by leicester, faking injuries etc..... you still are a tinpot club and we still dont care about you enjoy your curries xx Oh wow. Thick as shit, deluded and racist to boot. The girls must be queuing up. Scraping a point against a tinpot club thanks purely to the referee and you're proud?! How far your 'famous' club has fallen. Only you aren't famous. You're living off past glories. Your dad hadn't even had his first cock forcibly rammed up his ringpiece in borstal when you were a good side. All you've known is post-Clough misery, mediocrity and mockery. We pity you. Not only for your tragically low level of education which oozes from every post, but also from the fact that you believe, still, that you're a big club. Based on stuff that happened long before your miserable existence began on this earth. How tragic. It's almost as bad as Preston fans going about being the first double winners in 1888. Now run along little child before your sister starts ovulating. The last thing the world wants is a Raddy Van Basten Jr.
drc Posted 20 August 2011 Posted 20 August 2011 My view: It wasn't a penalty but of course the referee coukld say handball and that was what the idio did Sending off Kapser was as harsh as the penalty. Did you see the free-kick in the 89:th (or something like that) it wasn't a free-kick Their equaliser if the referre wanted to be harsh could be called of for being a push. I am so gutted, we needed the 3 points having said that if we won agianst Bristol City and drew against readeing I would have takan a dras at Nottingham cause it's one point away against a good oppositon. One more point, the last thing whatever you think about Sven is a change of manager, he have no excuses, he had a preseason and took in the players he wanted except Maynard. But taking in a new manager will only mess things up. Sven is good, Iäm sure there are gerater manager out there but let's just hope we will get a result next saturday. We are worth it. Love you all, Love Leicester, let's support our tem now. have a good night even if all of us feel like shit.
One Arm Babba Posted 20 August 2011 Posted 20 August 2011 I thought Greenings lunge in to Pantsil was far worse than any tackle in the game and he got nothing. I've seen straight reds for similar (Vassel at cov)
Vardinhio Posted 20 August 2011 Posted 20 August 2011 Funny how Forest think this is a big result for them. As for the Forest fans...those of you who come on here with racist comments are sad little scummy lowlifes, having lived in Radford as a student I fully expect you're from a similar ghetto and hence your comments fit perfectly with your scummy existence. Big result lads! What a joke. Shows how much expectations have changed between the 2 teams anyway.
Goddard Posted 20 August 2011 Posted 20 August 2011 Nugent was limping so had to be subbed. I think we were pretty good today, very unlucky with the penalty, but that's life. The tide will change, I am sure of it. I predict good things for September and October.
Yojoe36 Posted 20 August 2011 Posted 20 August 2011 I thought Forest didn't care about us? So they make accounts, and talk s*** on here. Probably because their a big club.
Jimothy Posted 20 August 2011 Posted 20 August 2011 Found this video on youtube, from French TV I think. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EPswZX1Av1c By the letter of the law, you could probably argue it was a penalty, but only the prickiest of refs would give it. Mill can't really do anything about it, he's got in a tangle, fell over and the balls hit his hand. The ball hit a hand in the area, so yes a penalty can be given, but in my opinion only a ref desperate to give a penalty would give that. For the sending off, the camera angle isn't great, but it looks to me Schmeichal throws the ball up the pitch. It might not have been right at the centre circle but it was certainly towards the halfway line, where the ball need to be. There's no excuse for the ref there, it's nothing about opinion, it's just not a sending off. He must been abused by a blonde Dane in a green shirt as a child to think that was worthy of a red.
Dylan Posted 20 August 2011 Posted 20 August 2011 Found this video on youtube, from French TV I think. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EPswZX1Av1c By the letter of the law, you could probably argue it was a penalty, but only the prickiest of refs would give it. Mill can't really do anything about it, he's got in a tangle, fell over and the balls hit his hand. The ball hit a hand in the area, so yes a penalty can be given, but in my opinion only a ref desperate to give a penalty would give that. For the sending off, the camera angle isn't great, but it looks to me Schmeichal throws the ball up the pitch. It might not have been right at the centre circle but it was certainly towards the halfway line, where the ball need to be. There's no excuse for the ref there, it's nothing about opinion, it's just not a sending off. He must been abused by a blonde Dane in a green shirt as a child to think that was worthy of a red. Look at Morgan (I think it is) straight after our 1st goal... Clearly boots the ball into the STAND, why was he not booked?
Trav Le Bleu Posted 20 August 2011 Posted 20 August 2011 Look at Morgan (I think it is) straight after our 1st goal... Clearly boots the ball into the STAND, why was he not booked? Absolutely. All we want is consistancy.
Salieri Posted 20 August 2011 Posted 20 August 2011 Found this video on youtube, from French TV I think. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EPswZX1Av1c By the letter of the law, you could probably argue it was a penalty, but only the prickiest of refs would give it. Mill can't really do anything about it, he's got in a tangle, fell over and the balls hit his hand. The ball hit a hand in the area, so yes a penalty can be given, but in my opinion only a ref desperate to give a penalty would give that. For the sending off, the angle isn't great, but it looks to me Schmeichal throws the ball up the pitch. It might not have been right at the centre circle but it was certainly towards the halfway line, where the ball need to be. There's no excuse for the ref there, it's nothing about opinion, it's just not a sending off. He must been abused by a blonde Dane in a green shirt as a child to think that was worthy of a red. You're right, he was a massive prick. <_<
Guest Col city fan Posted 20 August 2011 Posted 20 August 2011 I thought it went over the just over the head of McGugan from the tv pictures, but that's clearly a card. Just as bad as kicking it into the stands Utter crap.. You think that was as bad as hoofing the ball up into row z? Not even a card in my opinion. However, still a daft thing to do with refs like the ones we seem to be getting
earle the winger Posted 20 August 2011 Posted 20 August 2011 A draw at the trees is a good result but only if we had done better in the home games.The poor displays in the two games has added to the pressure at a normal away game.We have Soton ,Brighton and the rams before we get to the magical ten game mark.One of our problems at the moment is we dont respect the other teams in this division expecting an easy automatic promotion.I dont think we have better players than the other teams which means the management team needs to be better!I hope sven and his gang are though im starting to feel how i felt when Sven was England manager which isnt good!
Heart-Shaped Fox Posted 20 August 2011 Posted 20 August 2011 Sven should take some blame here as well. Second half we should have just shut up shop btu we failed to do so. Bringing Gallagher on was a terrible decision we all know he cant run, or tackle or hold the ball up. Waghorn or even Howard should have been on the bench to bring on. I'd rather have Schlupp on least he can run with the ball. 4 points out of 12 is hardly good enough. The bootom line is though, once again we fail to defend properly when it matters in injury time. AS soon as they made it 2-1 with ten mins to go, I think we all knew they were going to score again and they did. Shocking defending.
KARL-LCFC Posted 20 August 2011 Posted 20 August 2011 Surely a deliberate handball warrants a red card? And if it doesnt then how can it be 'deliberate'...shockingly bad referee.
Guest Col city fan Posted 20 August 2011 Posted 20 August 2011 Sven should take some blame here as well. Second half we should have just shut up shop btu we failed to do so. Bringing Gallagher on was a terrible decision we all know he cant run, or tackle or hold the ball up. Waghorn or even Howard should have been on the bench to bring on. I'd rather have Schlupp on least he can run with the ball. 4 points out of 12 is hardly good enough. The bootom line is though, once again we fail to defend properly when it matters in injury time. AS soon as they made it 2-1 with ten mins to go, I think we all knew they were going to score again and they did. Shocking defending. Much better performance overall, but why Gallagher? He's a useful player when we are dominating the game and winning free kicks, creating play etc... But not when we need to defend a lead... Again this makes no sense. I hope I can have this view because, of course, im not a part of the dressing room...no sod it, I'll have it anyway...
Heart-Shaped Fox Posted 20 August 2011 Posted 20 August 2011 Much better performance overall, but why Gallagher? He's a useful player when we are dominating the game and winning free kicks, creating play etc... But not when we need to defend a lead... Again this makes no sense. I hope I can gave this view because, of course, im not a part of the dressing room...no sod it, I'll have it anyway... Was a better performance for 70 mins, I'm sorry but Gallagher is actually shite. Scores the odd long ranger and the odd free kick and thats it. If he didnt do that people would realise he is shite. He didnt win one free kick, created nothing, and contributed nothing. Might as well had 9 men on the pitch.
sphericalfox Posted 20 August 2011 Posted 20 August 2011 Utter crap.. You think that was as bad as hoofing the ball up into row z? Not even a card in my opinion. However, still a daft thing to do with refs like the ones we seem to be getting Yes. He just gave the ref an earful of abuse for giving the penalty, and then he deliberately throws the ball away from two Forrest players running towards him to take it. The ref was going to give a yellow card all day long. And as it's bad sportsmanship to kick the ball into the stand, so if impeding the opposition to collect or retrieve the ball. I didn't want him sent off. The ref seemed adamant to change the game up for whatever reason he had. I knew if Weale came on we'd be in trouble.
Lillehamring Posted 20 August 2011 Posted 20 August 2011 100% bookable offence 100%? - come on - even if he hadn't been on a yellow, many refs wouldn't have batted an eyelid at that - it ended up pretty close to the centre circle, if it had gone in the stands fair enough. if refs want respect then they have to know when to tolerate a frustrated throw up field and when to send a player off.
sphericalfox Posted 20 August 2011 Posted 20 August 2011 Yoo-hoo Thracian! I've seen you lurking. Any obligatory disparaging remarks? You know you want to!
phildw Posted 20 August 2011 Posted 20 August 2011 The ball stayed on the field of play did it not? If anything, Schmeichel was doing the absolute opposite of timewasting by getting it back to the centre circle as quickly as possible. The decision would have been vaguely understandable if he stalled for time by kicking into the stands but a yellow card for that? Genuinely one of the most ludicrous decisions I have ever seen in English football [/quote Think you are all missing the point. Dissent can be shown by words or actions (that's the definition from the laws of association football) and clearly Kasper was showing dissent by launching the ball in frustration like that. Even Kasper admits himself. It was harsh by the ref agreed but he has done it by the book - shame he wasn't as consistent as that for the other 94 minutes!
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.