Finnegan Posted 31 March 2012 Posted 31 March 2012 Welcome to Foxestalk! ****ing tell me about it. I can't believe I even bothered posting that. Jesus this place annoys me on match days.
Dr The Singh Posted 31 March 2012 Posted 31 March 2012 Welcome to Foxestalk! Pearson and Beckford can foook offf
cc_star Posted 31 March 2012 Posted 31 March 2012 so we finally play the guy in to form, let him settle, let him strike up a partnership with his strike partner at the club... ... then we change the formation, make him play up on his own, cut his service back down again, turn his co-striker into an out of position winger and then... blame him for suffering? I'm not going to start screaming for Pearson to be sacked but if people can't accept that he's shown some serious tactical naivety over the last few weeks then they're being insanely blinkered. Did you say the same after the Hull win, when Beckford had a really great game up front by himself, with a very lively & creative trio of Nugent, Marshall & Dyer behind him? Can you link me to where you where calling NP's tactics naive when that formation worked in that game?
The People's Hero Posted 31 March 2012 Posted 31 March 2012 Beckford is a good player. He's a bit mardy and he's probably a complete tosser but he does offer something at this level that not many players do. NP will no doubt prefer to play Waghorn when fit... or Steve Howard... but I prefer Beckford. I can understand Beckford's frustration. DOesn't make it okay though. KNowing NP's man management this will just equal JB being frozen out and off loaded to be replaced by a hardworking, yes-man, limited ability clogger.
ithuriel Posted 31 March 2012 Posted 31 March 2012 Perhaps Nigel thought certain players were better than they actually were, Sven certainly did. Do we change the manager again who will keep a good number of these players until he has learned they maybe are not upto the job or do we clear out those that perhaps are not good enough to get this club out of this division?
SeattleShane Posted 31 March 2012 Author Posted 31 March 2012 Oh god Another thread with 10,000 comments despite no one knowing what will happen behind the scenes Sorry thought this was a football message board
sbfox Posted 31 March 2012 Posted 31 March 2012 please god ! not an LCFC type player...egotist and heartbreaker.. burnt his bridges today. So... he's not a complete donkey then? Sometimes I really, really don't like swathes of our fans. Its like they don't know football outside of 'big target man, two wide men and some overweight, bald lump at centre back'...
cc_star Posted 31 March 2012 Posted 31 March 2012 Beckford is a good player. He's a bit mardy and he's probably a complete tosser but he does offer something at this level that not many players do. NP will no doubt prefer to play Waghorn when fit... or Steve Howard... but I prefer Beckford. I can understand Beckford's frustration. DOesn't make it okay though. KNowing NP's man management this will just equal JB being frozen out and off loaded to be replaced by a hardworking, yes-man, limited ability clogger. Give me the playoff team over this ragtag, loose collection of non-achieving, big pay cheque, big time charlies any day of the week
Finnegan Posted 31 March 2012 Posted 31 March 2012 Did you say the same after the Hull win, when Beckford had a really great game up front by himself, with a very lively & creative trio of Nugent, Marshall & Dyer behind him? Can you link me to where you where calling NP's tactics naive when that formation worked in that game? I rarely ever post after games for the above mentioned reason. But we were massively mediocre against Hull and gave Beckford very little service, it took two brief wonder goals to beat them and we otherwise didn't look like scoring. Nor did we against Forest and, as I understand it, today. Why the **** change the system? It all started at Chelsea when nobody seemed to have a clue where they were playing. Dyer isn't a forward, a wide one or otherwise, and Nugent isn't a winger. And the strongest asset of the side was the Beckford-Nugent link up and we've ballsed that up. As I said, I'm not a Pearson hater and I don't want him sacked but ***** like you who refuse to take your ****ing head out of his arse are seriously starting to push me that way. The man isn't perfect, he's a very inexperienced manager and at times it's seriously showing.
sbfox Posted 31 March 2012 Posted 31 March 2012 Did you say the same after the Hull win, when Beckford had a really great game up front by himself, with a very lively & creative trio of Nugent, Marshall & Dyer behind him? Can you link me to where you where calling NP's tactics naive when that formation worked in that game? It didnt really work though... We got two fairly fortunate goals and then created bugger all for 60 minutes...
THEFATBASTARD Posted 31 March 2012 Posted 31 March 2012 So... he's not a complete donkey then? Sometimes I really, really don't like swathes of our fans. Its like they don't know football outside of 'big target man, two wide men and some overweight, bald lump at centre back'... thats it, put words in my mouth I never said, calm down son..being a top player includes other things than just ability...beckford is sadly lacking in many areas..
cc_star Posted 31 March 2012 Posted 31 March 2012 I rarely ever post after games for the above mentioned reason. But we were massively mediocre against Hull and gave Beckford very little service, it took two brief wonder goals to beat them and we otherwise didn't look like scoring. Nor did we against Forest and, as I understand it, today. Why the **** change the system? It all started at Chelsea when nobody seemed to have a clue where they were playing. Dyer isn't a forward, a wide one or otherwise, and Nugent isn't a winger. And the strongest asset of the side was the Beckford-Nugent link up and we've ballsed that up. As I said, I'm not a Pearson hater and I don't want him sacked but ***** like you who refuse to take your ****ing head out of his arse are seriously starting to push me that way. The man isn't perfect, he's a very inexperienced manager and at times it's seriously showing. You call me a c-un-t? (*edit* which was starred out when I wrote it) Seriously... Is that allowed mods? If so, I'm gonna let rips on some ***** on here I was merely pointing out your usual hypocrisy... no you didn't pipe up then because we won, but a defeat and you can't wait to sign in and pipe up I don't give two shit about NP, what I can't stand is people who want yet another change before time has been given
The People's Hero Posted 31 March 2012 Posted 31 March 2012 I'm firmly in Finners' camp. If he gets banned for calling this guy - you might as well send me on my way too.
Dr The Singh Posted 31 March 2012 Posted 31 March 2012 I'm firmly in Finners' camp. If he gets banned for calling this guy - you might as well send me on my way too. People need to get lives, think of the children
Finnegan Posted 31 March 2012 Posted 31 March 2012 You call me a ****? Seriously... Is that allowed mods? I was merely pointing out your usual hypocrisy... no you didn't pipe up then because we won, but a defeat and you can't wait to sign in and pipe up I don't give two shit about NP, what I can't stand is people who want yet another change before time has been given My usual hypocrisy? **** off, I'm probably one of the single most consistent posters on here and I'm honest enough to admit when I'm wrong. If anyone's a hypocrite it's Mr. "I don't want to see all this chop and changing, I'm not a Pearson bumboy! Oh but I couldn't wait to see the back of Sven, despite, yknow all of our best players this season being his signings!" Mr. "Frothing at the mouth every time someone criticizes Pearson or one of Sven's players has a bad day at the office." Go play on the M1, I've got better things to do than argue with ****ing knuckle draggers on the internet. Peace, pub calleth.
The People's Hero Posted 31 March 2012 Posted 31 March 2012 People need to get lives, think of the children Amen. I'm off for a G&T. I'll leave the NP lovers to convince themselves everything is spot on and if we just win the next 6 in a row.....
ithuriel Posted 31 March 2012 Posted 31 March 2012 Maybe he can be yellow carded and have to send an apology Maybe peeps should calm down a little, it was a longshot and this team did its usual thing of faltering when the pressure is on. The Thais will review the season and make a decision on what needs to change. Hate peeps saying NP lovers, Sven lovers etc., it is a cheap insult and i'm not cheap
Matt Posted 31 March 2012 Posted 31 March 2012 I'm firmly in Finners' camp. If he gets banned for calling this guy - you might as well send me on my way too. Please Mods, do everyone a favour.
Guest Posted 31 March 2012 Posted 31 March 2012 My usual hypocrisy? **** off, I'm probably one of the single most consistent posters on here and I'm honest enough to admit when I'm wrong. If anyone's a hypocrite it's Mr. "I don't want to see all this chop and changing, I'm not a Pearson bumboy! Oh but I couldn't wait to see the back of Sven, despite, yknow all of our best players this season being his signings!" Mr. "Frothing at the mouth every time someone criticizes Pearson or one of Sven's players has a bad day at the office." Go play on the M1, I've got better things to do than argue with ****ing knuckle draggers on the internet. Peace, pub calleth. Here here finnegan.
cc_star Posted 31 March 2012 Posted 31 March 2012 If anyone's a hypocrite it's Mr. "I don't want to see all this chop and changing, I'm not a Pearson bumboy! Oh but I couldn't wait to see the back of Sven Sven wasn't here for just a few months last time I checked, he had 2 transfer windows with spending reaching around £20m, so someone who failed to see what Sven was doing and wanting him out after a year is in a completele different situation to someone who wants Sven to have a similar amount of time and/or resources
Guest Posted 31 March 2012 Posted 31 March 2012 cc_Star. Without using rude language I have to agree with all the negative things written about you.
Jimmy Posted 31 March 2012 Posted 31 March 2012 so this would be player number 32 (at least) that Nigel seems intent on picking a fight with! Maybe Nigel's attitude is the problem... Anyone going off Stringer & Young is a moron, they have NEVER liked Beckford and jump on any excuse to hammer him for the slightest of things, its telling that LL on here and Carl by text, both of whom went, thought nothing of this "strop". Beckford is a moody player yes but a manager needs to know his squad, who he can/has to hammer and who needs a quiet word and an arm over the shoulder, Pearson doesn't seem to know this atm. We could also use a journo that doesn;'t have his own agenda and favourites stirring things as he doesn't like a particular player, I would of thought Nige would know what Stringer is like by now
acooling08 Posted 31 March 2012 Posted 31 March 2012 so we finally play the guy in to form, let him settle, let him strike up a partnership with his strike partner at the club... ... then we change the formation, make him play up on his own, cut his service back down again, turn his co-striker into an out of position winger and then... blame him for suffering? I'm not going to start screaming for Pearson to be sacked but if people can't accept that he's shown some serious tactical naivety over the last few weeks then they're being insanely blinkered. THIS!
yorkie1999 Posted 31 March 2012 Posted 31 March 2012 I texted my point about Beckford being praised by stringer for tracking back into radio Leicester and got 5 blocked calls and thought f**k that, so I texted them saying stop ring me because I'm not getting int a petty argument about Ian's lack of thought on what he's actually commentating about
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.