Webbo Posted 28 March 2013 Posted 28 March 2013 Could it be that the possible loan signing is a proper RB and so it's safe to let him go? Didn't Phil Neville use to play RB?
Greatness_Since_1884 Posted 28 March 2013 Posted 28 March 2013 Moore is at Brentford until April 27th. I think if we recalled him we couldn't play him for 28 days anyway as it's a youth loan.
Yojoe36 Posted 28 March 2013 Posted 28 March 2013 We don't have enough defenders as it is. I hope there's an actual reason behind this, because this is a joke. Can Pearson count?
Simmo86 Posted 28 March 2013 Posted 28 March 2013 Surely this is to help finance an incoming player? Or perhaps he's going to get regular football for a month and come back fit and ready for the play-offs? Have to be in the playoffs 1st!
dog_4 Posted 28 March 2013 Posted 28 March 2013 De laet and Moore can be recalled because its a youth loan! Whitbread,Morgan,Keane centre back and Konchesky and Schlupp Left back! Hardly a shortage!
Greatness_Since_1884 Posted 28 March 2013 Posted 28 March 2013 Rob Tanner â€@RobTannerMerc3m SSL to Millwall to get match fit so he is ready for play-offs should LCFC make it.
Dan Posted 28 March 2013 Posted 28 March 2013 Rob Tanner â€@RobTannerMerc3m SSL to Millwall to get match fit so he is ready for play-offs should LCFC make it. That is unbelievable If he doesn't get us in the play-offs and we get a defender injured (I'd bet my life savings on it) I think he's a certain goner.
Guppy Posted 28 March 2013 Posted 28 March 2013 That is unbelievable If he doesn't get us in the play-offs and we get a defender injured (I'd bet my life savings on it) I think he's a certain goner. St Ledger might have pushed for this as well. Seems the type to want to play every minute.
yorkie1999 Posted 28 March 2013 Posted 28 March 2013 Were going to give one player to each of the last 8 teams we play in payment for match fixing!
Harry - LCFC Posted 28 March 2013 Posted 28 March 2013 The more I think about the more I realise this isn't such a bad move. His performance against Derby suggested he's not up to speed yet. If we do get a defender injured I'm sure Pearson will have no qualms about recalling either him or Moore even if it involves having to compensate someone.
Dan Posted 28 March 2013 Posted 28 March 2013 Current first team defenders; Morgan Keane De Laet Konchesky Whitbread (unconvincing fitness) Schlupp (wasted in defence) If that carries us to a play-off finish with 8 games (including Forest, Brighton, Bolton, Watford & Palace) left in the space of just over a month, then I'll be amazed.
Soar Fox Posted 28 March 2013 Posted 28 March 2013 3 games in 8 days and we loan a defender out. An area that in my opinion we are already short in.
Dan Posted 28 March 2013 Posted 28 March 2013 The more I think about the more I realise this isn't such a bad move. His performance against Derby suggested he's not up to speed yet. If we do get a defender injured I'm sure Pearson will have no qualms about recalling either him or Moore even if it involves having to compensate someone. So who would've played at Derby instead? He was awful I agree but he's not had a bad game at centre half for us this season.
whoareyaaa Posted 28 March 2013 Posted 28 March 2013 Is this a fookin joke? I do hope so.. nope... http://www.lcfc.com/...oan-739445.aspx Crazy decison to be fair must be a reason behind it... Someone must be coming in.. But who...
Harry - LCFC Posted 28 March 2013 Posted 28 March 2013 Current first team defenders; Morgan Keane De Laet Konchesky Whitbread (unconvincing fitness) Schlupp (wasted in defence) If that carries us to a play-off finish with 8 games (including Forest, Brighton, Bolton, Watford & Palace) left in the space of just over a month, then I'll be amazed. That's been the back four that's held the best defensive record in the Championship with the exception of Keane. I actually don't think there will be any problems as a result of this loan move, we'll just recall players if we have to. So who would've played at Derby instead? He was awful I agree but he's not had a bad game at centre half for us this season. De Laet except he was injured, but now he's not so that's that problem sorted.
Soar Fox Posted 28 March 2013 Posted 28 March 2013 The more I think about the more I realise this isn't such a bad move. His performance against Derby suggested he's not up to speed yet. If we do get a defender injured I'm sure Pearson will have no qualms about recalling either him or Moore even if it involves having to compensate someone. Sir Nige has sanctioned the move, know surprise that you agree with it.
Happy Fox Posted 28 March 2013 Posted 28 March 2013 It completely doesn't make sense at all need CB/RB cover Whitbread is not match fit so we loan out our match fit defender where is the logic?
Harry - LCFC Posted 28 March 2013 Posted 28 March 2013 Sir Nige has sanctioned the move, know surprise that you agree with it. Oh I do apologise for actually liking Pearson, only our best manager in the past nine years. I admit I don't fully agree with him but this isn't the disastrous decision that some people are making it out to be. Any problems that do arise can be easily dealt with by recalling a player.
Guppy Posted 28 March 2013 Posted 28 March 2013 That's been the back four that's held the best defensive record in the Championship with the exception of Keane. I actually don't think there will be any problems as a result of this loan move, we'll just recall players if we have to. I agree, we've got cover for left back in Schlupp, Zak will cover for 2 centre halfs (one ever present and one who should be able to handle games in quick succession) and I would imagine Moore is available for recall if needed to cover RB and be fully match fit. I don't think loaning him out for a month is such a big problem either.
Foxfromburbage Posted 28 March 2013 Posted 28 March 2013 SSL to Millwall with no charge to them and they let us Win tomorrow... Buying a win !
GingerrrFox Posted 28 March 2013 Posted 28 March 2013 Moore if recalled cannot play for 28 days because it's a youth loan. So stop saying we can just recall Moore because in reality we can't!!!!!!!
Bert Posted 28 March 2013 Posted 28 March 2013 They want Shorey. Not sure if the window is closed though?
RowlattsFox Posted 28 March 2013 Posted 28 March 2013 Moore if recalled cannot play for 28 days because it's a youth loan. So stop saying we can just recall Moore because in reality we can't!!!!!!! Is that right? I thought it was we can't recall him for 28 days but after that we can call him back anytime. Although to be honest I don't know the difference between a normal loan and a youth loan.
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.