MrSpaM Posted 26 November 2013 Posted 26 November 2013 He's made some great tackles this season in the few times I've seen him play
Fox92 Posted 26 November 2013 Posted 26 November 2013 I've not seen much of him to form an opinion in general, however, looking at his career history, I think he maybe a good player to have around the club; several promotions with Brighton and Southampton I think. Wasn't he captain as well? He comes across as a good professional as well.
Leicester_Numan Posted 27 November 2013 Posted 27 November 2013 DM is possibly the only outfield role where you don't even have to touch the ball to be effective. They can cut off potential passes and halt attacks just by being in the right place, allowing his team mates to get back and cover. A player who does this well will be totally anonymous as it will never be noticed unless you spent 90 minutes watching them. This is probably the type of game that Hammond had at Ipswich
ealingfox Posted 27 November 2013 Posted 27 November 2013 Have loved seeing him barking orders when he's come on, telling the others where to stand when we are trying to see out games. Something we lacked last season, just like experience, and a sodding DM. Likely to be a shrewd addition and proving so thus far imo.
The Year Of The Fox Posted 27 November 2013 Posted 27 November 2013 I've not see him do much in games Ive been to bar get a foot in here and there though the balls then ended up back with the opposition only momentarily breaking up their attack. I still don't doubt he will come into his own towards the end of the season.
Guest Col city fan Posted 27 November 2013 Posted 27 November 2013 Not at all, Makelele was the best in the business at it, was I as impressed as an Henry hatrick? far from it. A Torres hatrick is far more impressive than a john obi mikel wonder game... You do talk some garbage. And how do you think Henry got the ball to be able to score a hat-trick? Because it was won back by the team, usually starting with Viera and Petit who then gave it back to him to do his damage. Many people on here hail Izzett... Muzzy Izzett would be the first to tell you that the presence of Lennon enabled him to play the way he did. He could get forward at will, knowing that Lennon would stay back and do the 'dirty work'. I'm not surprised at your love of Henry. It's much easier to praise someone popping in a few goals than it really is to watch a game and see where those goals are starting from. 'Sven's son' is about right for you.
Haydos Posted 27 November 2013 Posted 27 November 2013 DM is possibly the only outfield role where you don't even have to touch the ball to be effective. They can cut off potential passes and halt attacks just by being in the right place, allowing his team mates to get back and cover. A player who does this well will be totally anonymous as it will never be noticed unless you spent 90 minutes watching them. This is probably the type of game that Hammond had at Ipswich Exactly. Personally I think King is sub-consciously (or maybe consciously if I give him a bit of credit) very good at this. Even when he's running back he often fills channels that cut out the route for direct passes.
Bert Posted 27 November 2013 Posted 27 November 2013 And how do you think Henry got the ball to be able to score a hat-trick? Because it was won back by the team, usually starting with Viera and Petit who then gave it back to him to do his damage. Many people on here hail Izzett... Muzzy Izzett would be the first to tell you that the presence of Lennon enabled him to play the way he did. He could get forward at will, knowing that Lennon would stay back and do the 'dirty work'. I'm not surprised at your love of Henry. It's much easier to praise someone popping in a few goals than it really is to watch a game and see where those goals are starting from. 'Sven's son' is about right for you. But I think you're missing the whole point Col. The original point was that the dirty work goes un-noticed. Just take the arsenal game last night. Wilshere takes the headlines but I can bet hardly anyone will remember the job that Flamini did for the team. The players themselves appreciate it more than anything but all the fans will remember is the goals and exciting stuff. These players, Flamini, Parker, Fernandinho just go around solely doing this type of stuff and unless they're in a team that's in a dogfight all season their work will go unnoticed.
Ric Flair Posted 27 November 2013 Posted 27 November 2013 It shan't be long until he pops up with a bullet header, he's a histiry of doing so.
Guest Col city fan Posted 27 November 2013 Posted 27 November 2013 But I think you're missing the whole point Col. The original point was that the dirty work goes un-noticed. Just take the arsenal game last night. Wilshere takes the headlines but I can bet hardly anyone will remember the job that Flamini did for the team. The players themselves appreciate it more than anything but all the fans will remember is the goals and exciting stuff. These players, Flamini, Parker, Fernandinho just go around solely doing this type of stuff and unless they're in a team that's in a dogfight all season their work will go unnoticed. I'm not missing the point at all. The stuff these guys do IS noticeable, for those wanting to notice it. The City fans used to notice the work Lennon did and applaud him for it. Making that timely tackle to stop the opposition from scoring should be praised as much as the player who pops up with the winner. I know I do. No point missed here. Andy King's work, for me, never goes unnoticed. I simply think he's a better player going forward, and always have.
MGLCFC Posted 27 November 2013 Posted 27 November 2013 Andy King is too nice to be a truly effective defensive midfielder - he hardly ever gets booked and whilst I'm not advocating a thug as our defensive midfielder, genuinely good ones are prone to a suspension or two a season, by the very nature they get stuck in and can mix it.
Jimmy Posted 27 November 2013 Posted 27 November 2013 Andy King is too nice to be a truly effective defensive midfielder - he hardly ever gets booked and whilst I'm not advocating a thug as our defensive midfielder, genuinely good ones are prone to a suspension or two a season, by the very nature they get stuck in and can mix it. not in the modern game, you are thinking back to the Paul Ince's Makelele was hardly ever booked or suspended, its about positioning and intercepting more then tackling now, the best DM's don't need to tackle as they just stop the ball from reaching its target
Corky Posted 27 November 2013 Posted 27 November 2013 It shan't be long until he pops up with a bullet header, he's a histiry of doing so. Scored nearly 40 league goals in his career, not a bad tally for a DM.
Stadt Posted 27 November 2013 Posted 27 November 2013 Scored nearly 40 league goals in his career, not a bad tally for a DM.One better than the Pole
Bert Posted 27 November 2013 Posted 27 November 2013 I'm not missing the point at all. The stuff these guys do IS noticeable, for those wanting to notice it. The City fans used to notice the work Lennon did and applaud him for it. Making that timely tackle to stop the opposition from scoring should be praised as much as the player who pops up with the winner. I know I do. No point missed here. Andy King's work, for me, never goes unnoticed. I simply think he's a better player going forward, and always have. Maybe not for YOU but OTHERS. How many people comment about the dirty work... Hardly any.
Bettsj2 Posted 27 November 2013 Posted 27 November 2013 He's shit. We should be signing better players. Wot Pearson doin?
Stadt Posted 27 November 2013 Posted 27 November 2013 Andy King does donkey work = good/missing Dean Hammond donkey work = useless/anonymous/missing/not good enough/steady
MGLCFC Posted 28 November 2013 Posted 28 November 2013 not in the modern game, you are thinking back to the Paul Ince's Makelele was hardly ever booked or suspended, its about positioning and intercepting more then tackling now, the best DM's don't need to tackle as they just stop the ball from reaching its target The best defensive midfielders in the Prem Paulinho - Spurs Yaya Toure - Man City Michael Carrick - Man United Lucas - Liverpool Michael Essien / John Obe Mikkel / Frank Lampard - Chelsea These are all top modern footballers who have accumulated numerous bookings this season. It's not just about positioning in our league, it's sometimes being able to fight the physical battle against big strong teams. Unfortunately Kingy is not this type of player and we will come up against teams, i.e. Millwall on Saturday where a strong physical presence is needed otherwise we may become overrun in midfield.
Lineker's Left Foot Posted 28 November 2013 Posted 28 November 2013 Tbf I would start Kingy on the bench with James and Drinky in the centre
svensson Posted 28 November 2013 Posted 28 November 2013 The best defensive midfielders in the Prem Paulinho - Spurs Yaya Toure - Man City Michael Carrick - Man United Lucas - Liverpool Michael Essien / John Obe Mikkel / Frank Lampard - Chelsea These are all top modern footballers who have accumulated numerous bookings this season. It's not just about positioning in our league, it's sometimes being able to fight the physical battle against big strong teams. Unfortunately Kingy is not this type of player and we will come up against teams, i.e. Millwall on Saturday where a strong physical presence is needed otherwise we may become overrun in midfield. Toure and Lampard defensive midfielders?? You are confused. You get booked for sneezing in the prem.
MGLCFC Posted 28 November 2013 Posted 28 November 2013 Lampard and Toure do play that role, particularly when Chelsea have Hazard, Oscar and Mata playing. Toure is also a defensive midfielder, unless Fernandinho plays, who also picks up numerous yellow cards. Good, tough tackling hard men do pick up yellow card - whether the modern game suggests they are not required I'd argue against, particularly in our league where last season around this time we were steamrolled in midfield too many times.
Jimmy Posted 28 November 2013 Posted 28 November 2013 Lampard may well play deeper now but he is in no way defensive, he doesn't know how for a start, he is more of a deep lying playmaker, same for Toure and Paulinho, Sandro does the defensive job for Spurs
Dan Posted 28 November 2013 Posted 28 November 2013 And how do you think Henry got the ball to be able to score a hat-trick? Because it was won back by the team, usually starting with Viera and Petit who then gave it back to him to do his damage. Many people on here hail Izzett... Muzzy Izzett would be the first to tell you that the presence of Lennon enabled him to play the way he did. He could get forward at will, knowing that Lennon would stay back and do the 'dirty work'. I'm not surprised at your love of Henry. It's much easier to praise someone popping in a few goals than it really is to watch a game and see where those goals are starting from. 'Sven's son' is about right for you. But you're effectively saying Hammond doesn't do this because he isn't crunching people with tackles? I think it's a very English way of thinking that to be defensive, you have to do it with clarity - strong tackles, physique and strength. It's not always like that. The best holding midfielder on the planet at the minute (in my opinion) doesn't go round crunching people. It's down to intelligence, movement, organisation - as well as winning the ball. The latter doesn't necessarily make a good holding midfielder. It's a bit silly to compare Hammond to the likes of Makelele, Petit & Vieira. They were all absolutely superb players.
Guest Col city fan Posted 28 November 2013 Posted 28 November 2013 But you're effectively saying Hammond doesn't do this because he isn't crunching people with tackles? I think it's a very English way of thinking that to be defensive, you have to do it with clarity - strong tackles, physique and strength. It's not always like that. The best holding midfielder on the planet at the minute (in my opinion) doesn't go round crunching people. It's down to intelligence, movement, organisation - as well as winning the ball. The latter doesn't necessarily make a good holding midfielder. It's a bit silly to compare Hammond to the likes of Makelele, Petit & Vieira. They were all absolutely superb players. I wasn't comparing Hammond to them?
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.