Buce Posted 11 April 2014 Posted 11 April 2014 http://m.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-dorset-26979187 Surely the best solution is to 'accidentally' drop the bloody thing?
indierich06 Posted 11 April 2014 Posted 11 April 2014 FFS, wouldn't want to infringe upon a paedohphile's right to look at pictures of kids now, would we? They should just delete the photos and keep schtum. If he wants to sue, or bring some sort of case against the police for deleting his child porn, then let him. I'd love to see that.
Trav Le Bleu Posted 11 April 2014 Posted 11 April 2014 I understand that the law is the law, so how about they strike some kind of deal? He agrees to them being deleted and gets a month knocked off his sentence. Shows a degree (I know it's small) of repentence and problem solved.
indierich06 Posted 11 April 2014 Posted 11 April 2014 I understand that the law is the law, so how about they strike some kind of deal? He agrees to them being deleted and gets a month knocked off his sentence. Shows a degree (I know it's small) of repentence and problem solved. I think in this case the law is wrong. They might not be classed as indecent or prohibited, but it's obvious that they should be considered so in this case. Wouldn't it be nice if the law was applied with common sense, rather than to the letter? If I was the girl's old man, I'd be waiting outside the police station to 'bump' into him on his way out - if his laptop takes a bit of a tumble, then never mind.
Buce Posted 11 April 2014 Author Posted 11 April 2014 I think in this case the law is wrong. They might not be classed as indecent or prohibited, but it's obvious that they should be considered so in this case. Wouldn't it be nice if the law was applied with common sense, rather than to the letter? If I was the girl's old man, I'd be waiting outside the police station to 'bump' into him on his way out - if his laptop takes a bit of a tumble, then never mind. If it was my daughter he'd abused, I'd be waiting for him, but it would be more than the laptop that would be broken.
Bayfox Posted 11 April 2014 Posted 11 April 2014 What a ****ed up world we live in, you couldn't make this shit up.
Captain... Posted 11 April 2014 Posted 11 April 2014 http://m.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-dorset-26979187 Surely the best solution is to 'accidentally' drop the bloody thing? You would have to destroy his hard drive, just dropping it wouldn't do enough, there is also a good chance he has backed his files up, although maybe not in this case, I don't know if paedos want duplicates of their images floating around. The solution (short term) is to ask him at his parole hearing if they have his permission to delete them, making it clear that him saying yes would make it more likely they would decide in his favour, him saying no would be held against him. Long term solution is to fix the law.
muzzycomeback Posted 11 April 2014 Posted 11 April 2014 I didn't read the article but the thread title made me think of liberty x
Guest MattP Posted 11 April 2014 Posted 11 April 2014 Child porn will all be legal in 50 years anyway. The deputy leader of the Labour party believes offenders shouldn't be prosecuted if they child hasn't be hurt from the pictures. Can only concur with what a couple have said, what a World we live in.
MPH Posted 11 April 2014 Posted 11 April 2014 I'm pretty sure that lap top will get accidently damaged.. and no one will know how....
Rincewind Posted 11 April 2014 Posted 11 April 2014 Maybe it should be up to the parents to decide what is to be done with the pictures. They were taken while the girl was under age and unable to give permission for them to be reproduced. The tricky thing is that as they have said the pictures are not classed as pornagraphic. You see similar in shopping catalogs and on this forum. If anyone on this forum was done would the 'Hottest babes' thread have to be removed? Anyway the law is an ass as someone once said and commen sense does not come into it.
davieG Posted 11 April 2014 Posted 11 April 2014 Perhaps people will need to register their children under some sort of image rights scenario so that any unauthorised/unjustified use means they can be deleted/destroyed. Unfortunately that would affect every parent taking pictures of their kids in school events but i guess that happens more and more these days anyway.
ADK Posted 11 April 2014 Posted 11 April 2014 Sounds like an excuse to bring in more legislation for the authorities to confiscate whatever digital property they like.
Strokes Posted 11 April 2014 Posted 11 April 2014 Sounds like an excuse to bring in more legislation for the authorities to confiscate whatever digital property they like.How did you come to that conclusion?
Guest MattP Posted 11 April 2014 Posted 11 April 2014 Sounds like an excuse to bring in more legislation for the authorities to confiscate whatever digital property they like.Or maybe people just think families should have the right to stop people who have molested their children wanking over them? Or is that just too much of a non whacko jacko conspiracy theory for people to believe in these days?
ADK Posted 11 April 2014 Posted 11 April 2014 How did you come to that conclusion? I'm just cynical like that. Hopefully it results in some sort of law that requires the offender to actually be convicted and cannot be used for other purposes.
ADK Posted 11 April 2014 Posted 11 April 2014 Or maybe people just think families should have the right to stop people who have molested their children wanking over them? Or is that just too much of a non whacko jacko conspiracy theory for people to believe in these days? I don't think anyone would argue with that. It seems like such common sense that you wonder why there's nothing like that already in law.
Rincewind Posted 11 April 2014 Posted 11 April 2014 A few years ago when on holiday in Spain I took some pictures from my hotel window of a football match which was next to the hotel. I showed the pictures to someone i had met and he said they were illegal as I had not asked their permission. The fact that it was a boys game never occurred to me as being any different to a normal game. It was a football match as far as I was concerned. He even said if I took photos of a crowd at a football match I needed permission. If I was a parent I would seek the deletion of the pictures on these grounds.
Guest MattP Posted 11 April 2014 Posted 11 April 2014 I don't think anyone would argue with that. It seems like such common sense that you wonder why there's nothing like that already in law.Are you really that surprised we don't? As mentioned the Labour party has numerous mps that wanted to give consideration to lowering the age of consent to 11. I'm sure they're kiddy fiddlers across all three parties, can even begin to imagine some of the secrets in Simon Hughes closet? If I wanted my children looked after the last place I would go is the houses of parliament.
Guest Posted 11 April 2014 Posted 11 April 2014 Or maybe people just think families should have the right to stop people who have molested their children wanking over them? Or is that just too much of a non whacko jacko conspiracy theory for people to believe in these days? Certainly he shouldn't be allowed the photos but if wanking over photos becomes a crime then a lot of the guys on foxestalk are in trouble.
Guest MattP Posted 11 April 2014 Posted 11 April 2014 Kinda sums up what's wrong with people to be honest.
Craig Posted 11 April 2014 Posted 11 April 2014 A few years ago when on holiday in Spain I took some pictures from my hotel window of a football match which was next to the hotel. I showed the pictures to someone i had met and he said they were illegal as I had not asked their permission. The fact that it was a boys game never occurred to me as being any different to a normal game. It was a football match as far as I was concerned. He even said if I took photos of a crowd at a football match I needed permission. If I was a parent I would seek the deletion of the pictures on these grounds.
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.