The Doctor Posted 13 February 2017 Posted 13 February 2017 2 minutes ago, Moksky said: No I don't I mean Ranieri I was talking about the person you were responding to...
Tuna Posted 13 February 2017 Posted 13 February 2017 Just now, Moksky said: Ahem 120 a week For a player who hasn't had a shot on target for nearly 2 months! http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/football/article-4220170/Jamie-Vardy-hasn-t-shot-target-December-17.html
Blue ROI Posted 13 February 2017 Posted 13 February 2017 Wouldnt take much notice of the article. The Italian press trying to defend Ranieri by the sounds of it.
Mickyblueeyes Posted 13 February 2017 Posted 13 February 2017 Just now, Moksky said: Ahem 120 a week Oh yes, what have we given the world. I'm sorry on behalf of our club.
Moksky Posted 13 February 2017 Posted 13 February 2017 Just now, The Doctor said: I was talking about the person you were responding to... Ha ha confused.com
splinterdream Posted 13 February 2017 Posted 13 February 2017 48 minutes ago, SecretPro said: Drop the service tosh. A good striker will make and score goals. He's a one trick pony and if he isn't good enough to change his game, that's his problem alone. Jermain Defoe
SecretPro Posted 13 February 2017 Posted 13 February 2017 Just now, Tuna said: For a player who hasn't had a shot on target for nearly 2 months! http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/football/article-4220170/Jamie-Vardy-hasn-t-shot-target-December-17.html Yeah but, but, but it's lack of service. Obvs.
SecretPro Posted 13 February 2017 Posted 13 February 2017 Just now, splinterdream said: Jermain Defoe Prime example of a good, solid, reliable striker who can clearly get goals even when surrounded by utter shit.
Kitchandro Posted 13 February 2017 Posted 13 February 2017 4 minutes ago, Mickyblueeyes said: ? ok, maybe she just gave an interview to OK magazine on her designer vagina but it's fair assume what will appear in OK next. Jeez, we are paying this family £100k a week! Your exaggerations disappoint me.
coolhandfox Posted 13 February 2017 Posted 13 February 2017 2 minutes ago, daddylonglegs said: Ndidi & Slimani didn't play in normal time which takes off half of that haha You think its funny, that's 50 millions worth of talent couldn't beat Derby reserves without having to bring another 45 millions pounds worth of the bench!
Clever Fox Posted 13 February 2017 Posted 13 February 2017 2 minutes ago, SecretPro said: Yeah but, but, but it's lack of service. Obvs. Maybe the other players don't want to pass to him to make him look bad. . i've seen that happen before. Not that I'm a fan of his anyway.
daddylonglegs Posted 13 February 2017 Posted 13 February 2017 Just now, coolhandfox said: You think its funny, that's 50 millions worth of talent couldn't beat Derby reserves without having to bring another 45 millions pounds worth of the bench! It just didn't quite go our way. We created enough in that game and the previous one to win 6 games!
Cadno'r Cymoedd Posted 13 February 2017 Posted 13 February 2017 The great irony of this, IF true, is of course that Ranieri has remained loyal to a bunch of backstabbers. So, drop the fvckers and show some balls. Whilst they may have some legitimate reservations, their loyalty is to perform every week for the club that pays them very well.
Kitchandro Posted 13 February 2017 Posted 13 February 2017 1 minute ago, Clever Fox said: Maybe the other players don't want to pass to him to make him look bad. . i've seen that happen before. Not that I'm a fan of his anyway. TBF Mahrez only wants to pass to Slimani. Seriously.
Clever Fox Posted 13 February 2017 Posted 13 February 2017 the other thing from that Article is that the backroom staff are at loggerheads also. It doesn't look good at all and the Owners need to stp in and Bang heads together. Otherwise it'll end in misery for all.
SecretPro Posted 13 February 2017 Posted 13 February 2017 3 minutes ago, Kitchandro said: TBF Mahrez only wants to pass to Slimani. Seriously. Well we do know Mahrez hadn't been passing to Vardy deliberately for a while, but then Mahrez hadn't really provided for anyone else either. He's bound to try and pick out Slim, they are mates and have a good understanding of how eachother play at international level, it's only natural really and I don't begrudge it him. In fact I think Mahrez changed the game against Derby with his on the ball play but also he linked up well with Slim, Ndidi and Gray. Maybe because they actually provide a bit of movement and willing, rather than waiting for the ball over the top of the last man that simply no longer works.
Foxy-Lady Posted 13 February 2017 Posted 13 February 2017 1 minute ago, Kitchandro said: TBF Mahrez only wants to pass to Slimani. Seriously. I was beginning to think it was just me who was imagining that...! Pleased to see at least one other person shares my view
splinterdream Posted 13 February 2017 Posted 13 February 2017 1 minute ago, SecretPro said: Well we do know Mahrez hadn't been passing to Vardy deliberately for a while, but then Mahrez hadn't really provided for anyone else either. Is this right or just rumours?
Monsell1976 Posted 13 February 2017 Posted 13 February 2017 Payet caused rifts at West Ham, refused to talk to his team mates, and West Ham were pretty much like we are now, ****ed off their best player, and the team did well again. If true, **** him off with the under 23's, back to fleetwood, I don't care, but if he's the problem, get rid and quick
Clever Fox Posted 13 February 2017 Posted 13 February 2017 Just now, SecretPro said: Well we do know Mahrez hadn't been passing to Vardy deliberately for a while, but then Mahrez hadn't really provided for anyone else either. 2 minutes ago, Kitchandro said: TBF Mahrez only wants to pass to Slimani. Seriously. Yes i noticed that but then again Slim is the only one that shows for him. Vardy is just to on dimensional.
SecretPro Posted 13 February 2017 Posted 13 February 2017 1 minute ago, splinterdream said: Is this right or just rumours? It's rumours but rumours I've heard on here and from several other people, one slightly connected. It's not concrete but it does kind of explain the need for the 'sit down' last week.
Clever Fox Posted 13 February 2017 Posted 13 February 2017 1 minute ago, Monsell1976 said: Payet caused rifts at West Ham, refused to talk to his team mates, and West Ham were pretty much like we are now, ****ed off their best player, and the team did well again. If true, **** him off with the under 23's, back to fleetwood, I don't care, but if he's the problem, get rid and quick Yes strong leadership is needed now, If the club has decided to back Claudio then any of the desenters should be removed from the team and a statement issued that they won't play for the Club again. The Club needs to take the high moral principled position.
SecretPro Posted 13 February 2017 Posted 13 February 2017 3 minutes ago, Clever Fox said: Yes i noticed that but then again Slim is the only one that shows for him. Vardy is just to on dimensional. Agreed, see above. It's psychology though, if you don't really like someone, subconsciously you probably will make the decision to pass to them less.
splinterdream Posted 13 February 2017 Posted 13 February 2017 Just now, SecretPro said: It's rumours but rumours I've heard on here and from several other people, one slightly connected. It's not concrete but it does kind of explain the need for the 'sit down' last week. Crikey, it's such a mess. 7 months ago I was talking to a Swansea fan about the sale of Ulloa thinking we were moving to a different level, I'm so embarassed.
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.