Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

1 RB

1 LB

2 CBs

1 AMC/F

1 RW/LW

2 ST

 

This is assuming all loanees clear off.  Assuming someone wants them.

 

Similarly if we're looking to shift out has-beens whose desire on the field of play I would question, a similar number need bringing in during the following window.

 

It's a major job this.  Too many players have nothing left to play for at the end of their careers.

Posted
1 minute ago, SouthStandUpperTier said:

Is this the most ironic post on Foxestalk ever?

I wish... but there's a lot of beauitifully typed stuff on ft that is either ironic or just crazy

Posted (edited)

New GK ( sadly Kasper has too many flaws this season)

New RB, CB and a creative MF/ no 10 are the essentials for me, any other purchases would be dependant on outgoings I feel.

Edited by Bluetintedspecs
Posted
5 hours ago, mozartfox said:

Would rather have Taylor Fletcher back. Same size and a fraction of the cost.

Really?? Shaqiri had a total of 15 goals and assists last season, one fewer than Eden Hazard, whilst playing for a shocking team. I'd definitely take him. 

Posted

A new goalkeeping coach would likely return 10x the points per pound spent, compared to any other investment.

 

I think there is no alternative but to shell out the going price for three significant talents: RB, CB, and a creative attacker who can beat a man, take a free kick, and thread an intelligent, accurate pass.

Posted
1 hour ago, foxinsocks said:

I wish... but there's a lot of beauitifully typed stuff on ft that is either ironic or just crazy

Do you often wear boxing gloves when typing? ;)

  • Haha 1
Posted
1 hour ago, Sunbury Fox said:

Really?? Shaqiri had a total of 15 goals and assists last season, one fewer than Eden Hazard, whilst playing for a shocking team. I'd definitely take him. 

Did Stoke a lot of good, Sorry but not for me.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...