Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
19 minutes ago, Sankey93 said:

 

stay well clear of him, he's a shadow of what he once used to be, the quoted figure is over double what he should actually go for

Posted
5 minutes ago, LVFox said:

I'd take a Zaniolo loan but he's far too risky permanently until he proves himself.

 

Talented yes but fitness and attitude worry me.

 

 

This. I thought he was excellent in both games against us last season. Loan with option to buy would be great

Posted
Just now, Tommy Fresh said:

Zaniolo is far to shithouse for us anyway 

Well with our only other "shithouse'er" seemingly coming to the end of his career, perhaps we do get another in?:ph34r:

Posted

Can’t believe there’s folk on here saying to swerve Zaniolo lol not that we’d get him but he’s absolutely mustard! Albrighton or Zaniolo… geeeerrrimin

  • Like 2
Posted
1 minute ago, GingerrrFox said:

It would be unreal to take Zaniolo and Tete/Gonzalez. Zaniolo can play as a striker/second striker as well as from the right. Zaniolo is mustard.

Hmmm. IS or WAS? 

Posted
2 minutes ago, GingerrrFox said:

It would be unreal to take Zaniolo and Tete/Gonzalez. Zaniolo can play as a striker/second striker as well as from the right. Zaniolo is mustard.

The reality is we need three wide players!

 

We won't, I very much doubt, sign more than one this window but all a RW does is give us a starter in that position. We'd still be 100% reliant on confidence-shot-to-pieces Harvey on the left and on Albrighton or Praet or Perez as back up on the right. We need an alternative to Harvey (eg a Lookman) AND an alternative to Tete/Gonzalez/Zaniolo...maybe by this time next year?

Posted
16 minutes ago, GingerrrFox said:

It would be unreal to take Zaniolo and Tete/Gonzalez. Zaniolo can play as a striker/second striker as well as from the right. Zaniolo is mustard.

all 3 would be amazing, none of the 3 would be reality

Posted
1 hour ago, Mr.Bingles said:

Saw this on Twitter. How can we not a) sack Rodgers and get a new manager b) sign a new keeper, centre back & winger if we are rolling with the big boys in terms of cash? 

10B480C9-DD3F-461B-8DDF-EDC3DF1B5825.jpeg


Revenue is the money coming in… but if what’s going out consistently exceeds your revenue, then there is potentially a problem.

  • Thanks 1
Posted
9 hours ago, Mr.Bingles said:

Saw this on Twitter. How can we not a) sack Rodgers and get a new manager b) sign a new keeper, centre back & winger if we are rolling with the big boys in terms of cash? 

10B480C9-DD3F-461B-8DDF-EDC3DF1B5825.jpeg

If you read the report itself on the Deloitte website, it shows you a quick snapshot of each club and one of the graphics is turnover to wages.

 

Lots of clubs are 55% - 75%. 

 

PSG, Everton and ourselves are horrendous at over 85%. Inter were bad, however they’re getting better.

 

Worth noting, the European money has helped us and we’re 8th in the Premier League in terms of revenue income. 
 

 

  • Thanks 1

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...