Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content
StanSP

LCFC vs ROMA Match Thread - 1st Leg, 28/04/2022 - BT SPORT

Recommended Posts

Posted

Take the draw, I didn’t see anything from the, to suggest We can’t win in Rome. Don’t think they were too much better than PSV. All to play for next week.

  • Like 3
Posted
1 minute ago, WinslowFox said:

Shows they are beatable when they travel Away from Home and we've failed to do that

Have a look at the starting 11 for Roma in the game in the group stage

Posted

Roma didn’t get out of second gear to be honest, we will have to play very well to beat Roma but we can do it if Rodgers goes for it and plays two upfront.

Posted
Just now, jmono84 said:

I sometimes wonder how Barnes has made it as a pro at the top level!

Bit extreme but his form in 2022 has been appalling imo. Seems to constantly lose the ball. Still, without him we would have lost that. 

Posted
2 minutes ago, Tom12345 said:

Should have gone for it a bit more in the last 10 mins.

 

Unlucky not to have taken the lead into the second leg.

This. Bit disappointing to see us passing across the back late in the game

Posted
1 minute ago, sm1 said:

Madison's selfishness means we dont take a 2-1 lead. Abit disappointed we didn't win this.

Your right be he wasn't the only one. Vardy done similar in the first half.

Posted
3 minutes ago, Happy Fox said:

Roma didn’t get out of second gear to be honest, we will have to play very well to beat Roma but we can do it if Rodgers goes for it and plays two upfront.

We didn't let them...

  • Like 2
Posted

Perez and Barnes..... The clumsy sisters.

Both look a mile away from premier league standard.

Ffs can we get a mediocre right sided player please to improve the quality there!

Madders and little Wes top class again

  • Haha 1
Posted

Feels weird in the sense this was our last big home game of the season. It's gonna be so downbeat if we lose next week. There's been that buzz ever since we were in the competition

Posted
16 hours ago, Tom12345 said:

Should have gone for it a bit more in the last 10 mins.

 

Unlucky not to have taken the lead into the second leg.

Just lately,when we went for it…Moaners went haywire,because we conceded..,,

Posted
16 hours ago, J. James said:

Perez and Barnes..... The clumsy sisters.

Both look a mile away from premier league standard.

Ffs can we get a mediocre right sided player please to improve the quality there!

Madders and little Wes top class again

I reckon we should frame your posts…

Posted
16 hours ago, Anglodanglo said:

 

The same Barnes that setup our goal shortly before an immense piece of tracking back to stop Tammy have a clear shot on goal?

That one?

Was good to see him doing this for a change. His attitude at Forest was appalling. Rodgers has clearly said he needs to do that side of the game or he isn't in the side.

  • Like 1
Posted
1 minute ago, Gamble92 said:

Was good to see him doing this for a change. His attitude at Forest was appalling. Rodgers has clearly said he needs to do that side of the game or he isn't in the side.

I would keep Barnes a long way from our defence…only if he is close,or at that moment in a clinch,competing for the ball.

He is the one I would have,staying permantly up field,not any further back than

tip of the circle,picking up loose ball,or being the immediate  get out for the defence…

Or we have him,playing a Gullit type role,covering the top half of the field,across all channels…

Posted
54 minutes ago, fuchsntf said:

I would keep Barnes a long way from our defence…only if he is close,or at that moment in a clinch,competing for the ball.

He is the one I would have,staying permantly up field,not any further back than

tip of the circle,picking up loose ball,or being the immediate  get out for the defence…

Or we have him,playing a Gullit type role,covering the top half of the field,across all channels…

Yeah I'm not against that, but the formation we have played with a 4-2-3-1 really did require him to help out. Thomas was left with 2 on him and no help at all. It was awful to watch.

Posted
2 hours ago, fuchsntf said:

I would keep Barnes a long way from our defence…only if he is close,or at that moment in a clinch,competing for the ball.

He is the one I would have,staying permantly up field,not any further back than

tip of the circle,picking up loose ball,or being the immediate  get out for the defence…

Or we have him,playing a Gullit type role,covering the top half of the field,across all channels…

Lol.... that's the first time I've seen Harvey Barnes and Ruud Gullit mentioned in the same sentence without the words not, good, lace, to, boots, enough, or his (in no particular order) in between. 🤣

No, HB couldn't begin to play that role but then you could count on the fingers of one finger the players who could.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...