Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted

Using statistics to claim black should be white, allied to pound shop Coaches with their ridiculous clichés to justify overthinking football, just about sums up modern football.

Posted
3 minutes ago, purpleronnie said:

We have lost more points from winning positions than any team.

Exactly my point from the analysis. It's all down to goals conceded. 

Posted
18 minutes ago, Area88 said:

It's high level analysis. The kind that premier leagues clubs use.

 

I can provide more granular level if needed. 

6 goals in the last 8 games tells a different story

  • Like 1
Posted
20 minutes ago, Area88 said:

I'll go get a job as a data analyst for a Premier League club and you can all laugh at me then. But I can assure you I will be highly paid and well regarded,

Brendan is bored already I see

  • Haha 2
Posted
29 minutes ago, Area88 said:

It's high level analysis. The kind that premier leagues clubs use.

 

I can provide more granular level if needed. 

Could you provide some of what you’re smoking? 

  • Thanks 1
Posted

Statistically,  i have shagged more women then leonardo dicaprio when looking at my palmela handerson wank stats.

 

 

Side note, we are shite!

Posted
16 minutes ago, Area88 said:

Exactly my point from the analysis. It's all down to goals conceded. 

So basically, what I'm hearing is that scoring goals is good and conceding goals is bad?

 

Can somebody forward this to the club please? See if we can find a manager who can understand this ground breaking analysis.

  • Haha 1
Posted
40 minutes ago, Area88 said:
  • We have scored 43 goals. Double about 8 out of 9 clubs ranked from 11th to 20th in the table.
  • Goals scored from other teams - Southampton  23 - Bournemouth 27 - Nottingham Forest 24, Everton - 23 - West Ham - 26  Wolves - 23- Crystal Palace 24 - Chelsea - 29
  • We have conceded 53 goals.  If we conceded only 13 less goals......
  • We would be top 6 based on the statistical data I.e. - Aston Villa are 7th with 38 goals scored and 40 goals conceded.

 

Source: Data analysis of the Premier League Table.

That's 1% analysis and 99% reading numbers from the prem table. We all know we're not bad at scoring and not good at defending.  What data and insight have you got that explains why, and what the club should do about it?

Posted
7 minutes ago, Winchesterfox said:

That's 1% analysis and 99% reading numbers from the prem table. We all know we're not bad at scoring and not good at defending.  What data and insight have you got that explains why, and what the club should do about it?

We have world class players and yet we all going to get relegated? We are the equivalent of Middlesborough in the 90s when they had Ravanelli and Juninho.

 

We score more goals than Chelsea and have the opposite problem to Chelsea.

Posted
1 hour ago, Area88 said:
  • We have scored 43 goals. Double about 8 out of 9 clubs ranked from 11th to 20th in the table.
  • Goals scored from other teams - Southampton  23 - Bournemouth 27 - Nottingham Forest 24, Everton - 23 - West Ham - 26  Wolves - 23- Crystal Palace 24 - Chelsea - 29
  • We have conceded 53 goals.  If we conceded only 13 less goals......
  • We would be top 6 based on the statistical data I.e. - Aston Villa are 7th with 38 goals scored and 40 goals conceded.

 

Source: Data analysis of the Premier League Table.

Brendan Rodgers if he was analysing his performance this season.

Posted

I think this is more or less how Infantino uses statistics as well - look at how many people enjoyed the World Cup! That’s what counts, not those few thousand migrants.

Posted (edited)
28 minutes ago, Free Falling Foxes said:

To flip things on it head as it were, I wonder where we would have finished in the title winning season if the same data/reasoning was applied?

it's an interesting question, our chance creation was second only to arsenal, our defence was 8th best in terms of chances given up. overall we were good for about a 3rd or 4th place finish, but conceded 9 less than expected. Fair to say that Kasper was the difference between "just" champions league and the title based on the stats

Edited by The Doctor
  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Posted

My data was to show we are TOO GOOD to get relegated. 

 

The data shows we just lack confidence in defence. That's all!!

 

Attacking wise we are still one of the best in the league.

Posted (edited)
8 minutes ago, Area88 said:

The data shows we just lack confidence in defence. That's all!

Its not confidence its proper tactics and organisation. Rodgers was totally clueless at that. Individual players have been singled out when the poor sods have been asked to play a flute concerto on a tin whistle. The next Joe who takes over has got to sort that out.

Edited by An Sionnach
  • Like 1
Posted
3 minutes ago, alanf0x said:

The only stat that means something is the final position in the table!! 

What about the fair play awards?

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...