Popular Post Mickyblueeyes Posted 13 November 2023 Popular Post Posted 13 November 2023 The ones upset with Braverman’s sacking tell you the type of people who support her. It also tells you that being on her side was very probably the wrong side. Rees-Mogg the latest to tell us that Suella knew what the British public wanted. Rees-Mogg is the least likely person in the world (even someone living in the Amazon would know more) that knows what the British public want. Similar feeling to Brexit to me. The guys on the side of Brexit were chumps like Gove, Johnson and Farage. Not really the best set of leaders. 5
ajthefox Posted 13 November 2023 Posted 13 November 2023 56 minutes ago, EnderbyFox said: "Daddy's home" Somebody warn Piglet 1
StanSP Posted 13 November 2023 Posted 13 November 2023 33 minutes ago, Finnegan said: The BBC's write up of Braverman reads like a fvcking tribute and the Tories still want to convince people it's a left wing news organisation? Christ alive. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-67137926 Oh she was head girl and so impressive! She's a fvcking fascist, get out of her arse. They're now lauding 'her eight choices moments in her words'. Why are they so nice towards her?! She was so divisive and callous.
HighPeakFox Posted 13 November 2023 Posted 13 November 2023 9 minutes ago, StanSP said: They're now lauding 'her eight choices moments in her words'. Why are they so nice towards her?! She was so divisive and callous. Fear.
westernpark Posted 13 November 2023 Posted 13 November 2023 45 minutes ago, Mickyblueeyes said: The ones upset with Braverman’s sacking tell you the type of people who support her. It also tells you that being on her side was very probably the wrong side. Rees-Mogg the latest to tell us that Suella knew what the British public wanted. Rees-Mogg is the least likely person in the world (even someone living in the Amazon would know more) that knows what the British public want. Similar feeling to Brexit to me. The guys on the side of Brexit were chumps like Gove, Johnson and Farage. Not really the best set of leaders. Corbyn was a Brexiteer too. Rees-Mogg and co, everything is self-serving for them. Although, it has been depressing seeing a positive reaction towards Cameron returning, it just demonstrates the ridiculousness of British politics at the moment. The man who is responsible for austerity, Brexit (partially), is viewed as a positive because he’s not verbally divisive and dangerous.
bovril Posted 13 November 2023 Posted 13 November 2023 3 minutes ago, westernpark said: Corbyn was a Brexiteer too. Rees-Mogg and co, everything is self-serving for them. Although, it has been depressing seeing a positive reaction towards Cameron returning, it just demonstrates the ridiculousness of British politics at the moment. The man who is responsible for austerity, Brexit (partially), is viewed as a positive because he’s not verbally divisive and dangerous. He's also corrupt as ****. Just an awful person and politician, far worse than those that have come after him. 1
Popular Post Mickyblueeyes Posted 13 November 2023 Popular Post Posted 13 November 2023 (edited) 1 hour ago, Finnegan said: The BBC's write up of Braverman reads like a fvcking tribute and the Tories still want to convince people it's a left wing news organisation? Christ alive. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-67137926 Oh she was head girl and so impressive! She's a fvcking fascist, get out of her arse. I’ll give them a ****ing timeline. Appointed as Attorney General as the only lawyer in the entire ****ing country who legitimised Johnson’s withdrawal agreement. She replaced Geoffrey Cox KC, who, regardless of your politics is an outstanding lawyer who couldnt bear it any further. By gaining the surprise role as AG (making her the “most senior lawyer in the country - on behalf of all lawyers, **** off) she gained KC status by default. She was then repeatedly criticised by the Bar Council and Law Society for bringing the role in disrepute. She then decided to run for leadership after the resignation of the fool who promoted her without justification. Thankfully she failed. Appointed HS - sacked for misconduct (on at least 2 occasions). re-appointed HS and than continued to fail to understand any aspects of role. She made monumental **** ups to include (but certainly not limited to): - saying to trade partner India - dealing with you could increase immigration. -dreaming of a plane taking off to Rwanda. -as a former Govt lawyer repeatedly making comments which blurred the line between police and the HS and separation of powers. -hate marches - failure to use diplomacy and undermining the Police force. -A ****ING LIFESTYLE CHOICE This women literally brought no value to Govt. none. Not a squeak. Surely she stands out just for that. Edited 13 November 2023 by Mickyblueeyes 12
st albans fox Posted 13 November 2023 Posted 13 November 2023 4 minutes ago, bovril said: He's also corrupt as ****. Just an awful person and politician, far worse than those that have come after him. Wow - must be the lowest bar ever !
Finnegan Posted 13 November 2023 Posted 13 November 2023 31 minutes ago, StanSP said: Why are they so nice towards her?! Well the former two political editors of the BBC have been Tories with very right wing politics, LK herself allegedly extremely so. In fairness to Chris Mason, his cards are so close to chest politically speaking that some of his oldest friends have no idea how he votes. So maybe that's a positive step. But given he was rubber stamped by Hardcore Johnsonite ex banker Richard Sharp (not to be confused with heroic officer of the people Richard Sharpe) to take the top job out of almost nowhere and the BBC's handling of some significant recent events has been, erm, well awkward to say the least I'm not sure he's doing a lot for complete impartiality.
bovril Posted 13 November 2023 Posted 13 November 2023 5 minutes ago, st albans fox said: Wow - must be the lowest bar ever ! Maybe "far" was a bit much. I maintain he's worse than any other PM not only in terms of the consequences of his time as leader but also in terms of his character.
Finnegan Posted 13 November 2023 Posted 13 November 2023 1 minute ago, bovril said: Maybe "far" was a bit much. I maintain he's worse than any other PM not only in terms of the consequences of his time as leader but also in terms of his character. I want it to be extremely clear that this is a condemnation of Boris and not a defence of Cameron but BJ is an objectively worse human being in terms of his character. That might be like picking between venereal diseases but still.
Foxdiamond Posted 13 November 2023 Posted 13 November 2023 54 minutes ago, StanSP said: Therese Coffey given the boot too. Good
bovril Posted 13 November 2023 Posted 13 November 2023 2 minutes ago, Finnegan said: I want it to be extremely clear that this is a condemnation of Boris and not a defence of Cameron but BJ is an objectively worse human being in terms of his character. That might be like picking between venereal diseases but still. Yeah you're probably right. Just the sight of Cameron has brought it all back today. Tbf though the guy face ****ed a dead pig 2
Dunge Posted 13 November 2023 Posted 13 November 2023 I consider myself a staunch defender of the BBC, and I feel this time is no different: There’s nothing wrong with that article. It’s not an opinion piece, nor should it be - just information about who, basically, Braverman is and her route to getting where she did. Particularly when you can find this article right next to it, which demonstrates the controversies: https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-67374951 1
st albans fox Posted 13 November 2023 Posted 13 November 2023 5 minutes ago, bovril said: Yeah you're probably right. Just the sight of Cameron has brought it all back today. Tbf though the guy face ****ed a dead pig Come on …..we’ve all been passed at uni …………….. haven’t we ???
LVFox Posted 13 November 2023 Posted 13 November 2023 I can't quite work out why Cameron would want to return to it all. Boredom being given as the reason but it's either to make far more connections than he currently has, or he's wanting a return to the top job. Wouldn't massively shock me if the next election is Starmer v Cameron.
bovril Posted 13 November 2023 Posted 13 November 2023 5 minutes ago, LVFox said: I can't quite work out why Cameron would want to return to it all. Boredom being given as the reason but it's either to make far more connections than he currently has, or he's wanting a return to the top job. Wouldn't massively shock me if the next election is Starmer v Cameron. chaos with Keir Starmer
Tommy G Posted 13 November 2023 Posted 13 November 2023 (edited) 1 hour ago, StanSP said: Therese Coffey given the boot too. Good, useless. You could write down her list of achievements on the back of a 10p piece. Edited 13 November 2023 by Tommy G 1
HighPeakFox Posted 13 November 2023 Posted 13 November 2023 30 minutes ago, bovril said: Tbf though the guy face ****ed a dead pig Thing is, though, this is a lie, and perpetuating it does nobody any good at all. 2
Leicester_Loyal Posted 13 November 2023 Posted 13 November 2023 Surely this is the worst Government we've ever had? Since 2019 it's been one disaster after the other. 1
bovril Posted 13 November 2023 Posted 13 November 2023 4 minutes ago, HighPeakFox said: Thing is, though, this is a lie, and perpetuating it does nobody any good at all. he would say that though
RonnieTodger Posted 13 November 2023 Posted 13 November 2023 I try not to let the news affect me, but I am so ****ing sick of this Tory party, it genuinely makes me angry. Even their bullshit social media strategy, jokingly announcing these appointments like transfers. Joking about reappointing the **** hugely responsible for the mess we’re in. After the scenes on Saturday and now this. Embarrassed to be British at the moment. 4
HighPeakFox Posted 13 November 2023 Posted 13 November 2023 25 minutes ago, bovril said: he would say that though I'm not sure he's on the record about it, but it's been debunked plenty of times elsewhere. Point is, it's nonsense designed to deflect.
Lionator Posted 13 November 2023 Posted 13 November 2023 One thing I don't get is that the tories promised mental health act reform in both the 2017 and 2019 manifestos and yet every year fail to put it in the kings speech despite the legislation being there ready to go. The existing act is not fit for purpose, allows for solitary confinement of people with autism and learning disabilities for one. What are the political/beurocratic reasons why they can't push this through?
Recommended Posts