Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
4 minutes ago, Sol thewall Bamba said:

Played 7, won 4, drew 3 lost 0.

 

2.14 ppg. Also conceded equalisers to Boro and Wrexham after he went off.

We scored the winner against Sheff Wed after he went off

 

We conceded the equalizer to Wrexham after he came on

 

We scored the winner against Norwich after he went off

  • Like 4
Posted
1 minute ago, moore_94 said:

We scored the winner against Sheff Wed after he went off

 

We conceded the equalizer to Wrexham after he came on

 

We scored the winner against Norwich after he went off

Nice. I'd still wager our ppg is better with him in than out.

Posted
3 minutes ago, Sol thewall Bamba said:

Nice. I'd still wager our ppg is better with him in than out.

Maybe, but it doesn't necessarily mean he is contributing well to the team, especially if it is meaning other players (JJ) have to get shoehorned in elsewhere

 

Some of those performances even if we win he was definitely a hinderance than a benefit to the team

  • Like 1
Posted
6 minutes ago, moore_94 said:

Maybe, but it doesn't necessarily mean he is contributing well to the team, especially if it is meaning other players (JJ) have to get shoehorned in elsewhere

 

Some of those performances even if we win he was definitely a hinderance than a benefit to the team

That's all well and good but our ppg without Jordan James starting is nearly double our ppg with him starting, so personally I'd be terminating his loan with immediate effect and building the team around the Skippmeister

  • Haha 2
Posted
1 minute ago, Guest said:

That's all well and good but our ppg without Jordan James starting is nearly double our ppg with him starting, so personally I'd be terminating his loan with immediate effect and building the team around the Skippmeister

That's why some stats are bollocks all you have to do is watch the game and you will see James is 10x the player of Skipp, he does **** all

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Posted
24 minutes ago, Sol thewall Bamba said:

Played 7, won 4, drew 3 lost 0.

 

2.14 ppg. Also conceded equalisers to Boro and Wrexham after he went off.

Great example of statistics being misleading

  • Like 2
Posted
Just now, Levi Port said:

Tries harder than any of the others but Winks has more quality and is playing well. Makes sense to play them both even though it’s not great 

He offers nothing apart from a few back passes 

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)
19 minutes ago, Sol thewall Bamba said:

Nice. I'd still wager our ppg is better with him in than out.

Or it the fact him playing keeps Soumare out the side

 

At least Skipp can be arsed to run.

Edited by coolhandfox
  • Like 1
Posted

I was briefly checking the Norwich forums during the match to see if they were as down on their team as we are, and Skipp was mentioned as a shadow of the player they had on loan.  He's not the player he was, even at this level.

Posted
6 minutes ago, coolhandfox said:

Or it the fact him playing keeps Soumare out the side

 

At least Skipp can be arsed to run.

He is chasing shadows mate, we don't need either of them in the side that's the point.

 

Just because Jonathan Rudkin paid 20m shouldn't mean he should be in the side, he offers nowt

  • Like 1
  • Thanks 1
Posted
2 minutes ago, whoareyaaa said:

He is chasing shadows mate, we don't need either of them in the side that's the point.

 

Just because Jonathan Rudkin paid 20m shouldn't mean he should be in the side, he offers nowt

I'd play a traffic cone of it stops Soumare playing.

Posted (edited)

Even the neutral commentator I had on the EFL feed was saying he wasn't sure just what Skipp added to our midfield.

Edited by Jaspa
Posted
2 minutes ago, whoareyaaa said:

We don't need to play either of them

The sooner Martí realises this the better

 

Surely he has to see how much better we and JJ are with him next to Winks and not in the 10

 

Play Bobby, Ayew, Monga etc. and just leave JJ as an 8

  • Like 3
Posted
9 minutes ago, JimJams said:

I was briefly checking the Norwich forums during the match to see if they were as down on their team as we are, and Skipp was mentioned as a shadow of the player they had on loan.  He's not the player he was, even at this level.

His confidence is absolutely shattered. Playing under three dreadful managers, a club that's lost its mojo, a critical crowd and the 20m price tag around  his neck. It ain't a great recipe. 

 

I'm not expecting a transformation, but I don't think we've seen anything near his best. I watched him at Spurs. He was tidy. Wasn't out his depth. Never 20m mind you. But the player we are seeing isn't the same lad at Norwich or Spurs. 

  • Like 2
Posted

Posted this the other day but I checked his injury record and it’s done him in.

 metatarsal fracture in May 2021, which required surgery on a broken bone in his foot. Then had pelvic/groin injury/inflammation that required surgery in 2022. Then when he returned after a lengthy lay off, he got a hairline heel fracture which included a deep laceration and also secondary damage on the bone.

has ever been the same player since.

Posted
13 minutes ago, Paninistickers said:

His confidence is absolutely shattered. Playing under three dreadful managers, a club that's lost its mojo, a critical crowd and the 20m price tag around  his neck. It ain't a great recipe. 

 

I'm not expecting a transformation, but I don't think we've seen anything near his best. I watched him at Spurs. He was tidy. Wasn't out his depth. Never 20m mind you. But the player we are seeing isn't the same lad at Norwich or Spurs. 

Pretty sure he has several injuries since then all you have to do is watch James and Skipp and its light and day

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Unfortunately, your content contains terms that we do not allow. Please edit your content to remove the highlighted words below.
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...