Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content
 Share
Ryy

Ezechiel Banzuzi

By Ryy, in Transfer Talk

Recommended Posts

FoxFossil

FoxFossil

Posted
Posted
On 07/12/2024 at 15:40, FrankieADZ said:

could be a hard deal to do, OH are a mean club with a tough DOF:ph34r:

The man with two brains. Will run out of time, arguing over deal.

  • Haha 1
DezFox

DezFox

Posted
Posted (edited)

Surely this is just the fact that we havent got 10 mill due to PSR. Even we surely can’t really want him and not get him. If it was an equivalent RB it would surely be a different story 

Edited by DezFox
les-tah

les-tah

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, Ian Nacho said:

This is absolutely comical. What is the point of a multi club ownership model if we have only used to loan our cast outs.

Genuinely can anybody answer this question what is the point in this model?
 

How does it benefit us in anyway shape or form?

 

I thought originally it was a loop hole to getting some secret wonderkids from South America.

  • Like 1
Lesta Legend

Lesta Legend

Posted
Posted
26 minutes ago, les-tah said:

Genuinely can anybody answer this question what is the point in this model?
 

How does it benefit us in anyway shape or form?

 

I thought originally it was a loop hole to getting some secret wonderkids from South America.

I don’t think there is any strategy we’re actively employing now. Perhaps because of a Brexit taking away the freedom of movement?

 

it’s pretty pointless tbh, not that i agree with signing this player for the sake of it but there doesn’t seem to be any usefulness to us as a club. Maybe they don’t want to be a feeder club to a poorly run yo yo club. 

MPH

MPH

Posted
Posted
3 hours ago, Blodge96 said:

Fabrizio has just confirmed this. Laughable that we're not leveraging our multi-club model

 

3 hours ago, FrankieADZ said:

multi club model and we dont even use it, we really do have idiots running the club dont we

 

3 hours ago, les-tah said:

Imagine he becomes a world beater and we lost out because Rudkin failed to agree a deal with himself 

 

3 hours ago, les-tah said:

Genuinely can anybody answer this question what is the point in this model?
 

How does it benefit us in anyway shape or form?

 

I thought originally it was a loop hole to getting some secret wonderkids from South America.


 

Do you really think we need another DM?

JimJams

JimJams

Posted
Posted
9 minutes ago, MPH said:

 

 

 


 

Do you really think we need another DM?

According to Transfermarkt in his entire club career he's played DM once in over 120 games.

  • Like 1
les-tah

les-tah

Posted
Posted

Maybe they can spend that £13 million on 13 hidden wonder kids from south america and actually develop them for us else this is the most pointless business model in football as we have gained zero from it other then pointless outgoing loans.

lcfc sheff

lcfc sheff

Posted
Posted

This club is embarrassing, there’s clearly something we aren’t aware of with this multi club model. We used to loan players to them, admittedly they’ve never done well bar Iversen (I think?) 

 

It would seem a clever move to sign him whether we’re relegated or not.

Lambert09

Lambert09

Posted
Posted

cmon now, use your heads. We arent getting him for free and we have a limited budget. No matte how good he is, he plays in the position that would be bottom of our  priorities right now. If we spent 13m on this kid and couldnt get a striker, rb or cb in the door ... we'd literally be fuming at the close of window. 

  • Like 1
K789

K789

Posted
Posted
13 minutes ago, UniFox21 said:

Would've been wiser to have not brought Skipp and used the cash to buy this lad 

We will have none of that common sense talk here!

  • Like 1
Clarkey123

Clarkey123

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, lcfc sheff said:

This club is embarrassing, there’s clearly something we aren’t aware of with this multi club model. We used to loan players to them, admittedly they’ve never done well bar Iversen (I think?) 

 

It would seem a clever move to sign him whether we’re relegated or not.

Got £8 million for Sowah, that’s about it.

  • Like 1
Wink84

Wink84

Posted
Posted
8 hours ago, moore_94 said:

They have their own Director of Football who would be dealing with it, not Rudkin

Can we swap DOF's with them?

Wink84

Wink84

Posted
Posted
3 hours ago, SouthStandUpperTier said:

And everyone overlooking the fact OHL don't want to be our (or anyone's) feeder club and might have actual ambitions of their own.

We're going to end up being the sister club to our sister club aren't we?

  • Haha 2
honeybradger

honeybradger

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, coolhandfox said:

Jesus we don't need a CM, we need a CB, RB, RWer and CF.

 

We cant spend 10m on a CM we don't need.

If Winks or Soumare get injured then we have to play Skipp or Choudhury.

honeybradger

honeybradger

Posted
Posted (edited)
27 minutes ago, coolhandfox said:

So you think we should prioritise a CM? 

I would say CM/DM would be up there as one of the priority positions. The Soumare - Winks midfield doesnt do enough to protect our already shakey defence.

 

A new DM would go a long way towards fixing our issues, I would rather sign a good defensively robust midfielder if one was available than sign a new centre back that we're not sure about.

Edited by honeybradger
coolhandfox

coolhandfox

Posted
Posted
20 minutes ago, honeybradger said:

I would say CM/DM would be up there as one of the priority positions. The Soumare - Winks midfield doesnt do enough to protect our already shakey defence.

 

A new DM would go a long way towards fixing our issues, I would rather sign a good defensively robust midfielder if one was available than sign a new centre back that we're not sure about.

But you can't be sure about the CM all transfers are a risk.

 

For me it would be RB, CB, RW and CF before a CM.

  • Like 1

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...