Our system detected that your browser is blocking advertisements on our site. Please help support FoxesTalk by disabling any kind of ad blocker while browsing this site. Thank you.
Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Posted
1 hour ago, LinekersLugs said:

UFS seem very quiet on this ??? 
 

 

Probably because after a long day assisting a charity, they’ve had a bit of time off tonight. I am sure they will discuss and consider 

  • Like 1
Posted
4 hours ago, Saxondale said:

This is reactionary bullshit. We’re actually in about the position we expected to be at the beginning of the season! The Leicester fans have become entitled babies. It’s embarrassing.

Do you prefer your prawn sandwiches on brown or white bread out of interest?

  • Haha 1
Posted
6 hours ago, Silva Fox said:

I was planning on staying away again as I did today but I'll be there if this is going ahead.

The journey of a thousand miles starts with one step, the journey for a better future for Leicester City starts outside the ground on 

February 15th 11.30am. Will be there to support the protest.

Posted
2 hours ago, LinekersLugs said:

UFS seem very quiet on this ??? 
 

 

Probably be better if it was led by another fan group/ different individuals. 
 

If it’s UFS led the club would just think it’s them trying to cause trouble. 

  • Like 4
Posted
6 hours ago, Saxondale said:

This is reactionary bullshit. We’re actually in about the position we expected to be at the beginning of the season! The Leicester fans have become entitled babies. It’s embarrassing.

I think you mean it's reactive bullshit.  Reactionary actually means wanting things to stay the same.

Posted
5 hours ago, Wasyls Pec Deck said:

Surely it was meant as a pisstake?!

Possibly - but it wouldn't be entirely out of character for this fanbase.

  • Like 1
Posted
9 hours ago, FrankieADZ said:

fully expect the club try and do something to try and stop this from happening

Too late, even if they try now the PR will be worse.

Posted

According to Lineker on motd, we've not scored at home for four consecutive league games. That apparently hasn't happened since 1983. If doesn't demonstrate what a hole this club is in I don't know what does. 

Posted
8 hours ago, Soar Fox said:

Probably be better if it was led by another fan group/ different individuals. 
 

If it’s UFS led the club would just think it’s them trying to cause trouble. 

 Agree with this. UFS will be denied further opportunities for the foreseeable if it’s them driving it. Plus, it’s more impactful if it’s not them because whilst UFS are a great group, they’re a minority of the fanbase. If the protests are coming from the wider supporters, it’s speaks volumes

  • Like 4
Posted

 

48 minutes ago, Mickyblueeyes said:

This should be pinned or bumped every few minutes to keep it at the top. 
 

 

It was pinned yesterday evening, wonder why it isn't anymore... :whistle:

  • Haha 1
Posted

What do we realistically genuinely want in the short term from this?

 

ill go first

 

- Rudkin agrees to step down

- Club significantly spends money in January on 3/4 players to give us hope and at least sets us up for next year at worst.

 

i dont think anything else drastically is going to change in the short term but they are my immediate hopes.

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

Loading...
  • Recently Browsing   0 members

    • No registered users viewing this page.
×
×
  • Create New...