SOCCERROO FOX Posted 4 March 2008 Posted 4 March 2008 I take it you speak from experience? Don't tell me - you went on local radio to back your dad who is doing a strectch for child rape. You're not the brightest 'Samilktray' but I get the feeling the moral penny might have dropped - at least it seems to have for everybody else.... Thats just chilidish and uncalled for. I take it you have no familly or friends or you do and they have never done anythhing wrong. Either that or you just want to make an argument for the sake of it so you can look like a big boy infront of the mirror. But its your opinion and your entitled to it
Bert Posted 4 March 2008 Posted 4 March 2008 Thats just chilidish and uncalled for. I take it you have no familly or friends or you do and they have never done anythhing wrong. Either that or you just want to make an argument for the sake of it so you can look like a big boy infront of the mirror. But its your opinion and your entitled to it Most of Chandler's arguments are always examples of things that haven't happened, but they could. (Not aimed at the dad comment) for instance: And why do I get the feeling that if his big bro was a paedo Tim would be a little more circumspect in his 'support?' It's always ifs and buts with Chandler.
DanTheFoxBhoy Posted 4 March 2008 Posted 4 March 2008 Every person is some mother's son, someone's brother etc. Timmy's bro is being punished by being locked away... hardly needs an overreaction from tools in the press when his brother laments the fact. He's still in jail, ain't he?
l444ry Posted 4 March 2008 Posted 4 March 2008 To justify Tim Cahill's celebration is yet another example of the decline of moral standards in life. What if Joey Barton had made a similar show of support for his scumbag racist murdering brother? To Joey Bartons credit, he made a plea for his brother to turn himself in to the Police. The press and most sane football supporters would have been up in arms if he hadn't... the same applies to Cahill. http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/uk_news/england...ide/4477156.stm
SOCCERROO FOX Posted 4 March 2008 Posted 4 March 2008 But lets think about it for a minute ITS HIS FOOKING BROTHER. It was just a gesture after he scored a goal with adrenlane running thru his body. Not once did IT say i support what my brother did, I support all criminals I despise my brothers Victim Kicking people in the head is OK. It was a goal celebration to say hey brother im still thinking of you mate. So he can do what he wants its his goal, his brother, whats the big deal
SamL Posted 4 March 2008 Posted 4 March 2008 But lets think about it for a minute ITS HIS FOOKING BROTHER.It was just a gesture after he scored a goal with adrenlane running thru his body. Not once did IT say i support what my brother did, I support all criminals I despise my brothers Victim Kicking people in the head is OK. It was a goal celebration to say hey brother im still thinking of you mate. So he can do what he wants its his goal, his brother, whats the big deal There is no big deal. It's all been blown out of proportion. A player should be able to dedicate a goal celebration to whoever he wants. Theres worse things in football right now than blummin' goal celebrations.
Darkzzz_ Posted 4 March 2008 Posted 4 March 2008 Who cares!!! I hate the media!! Let players celebrate how they want, obviously within reason of course. I don't suggest players should be allowed to run to a fan and bite there face in celebration or anything like this for example!!
purpleronnie Posted 4 March 2008 Posted 4 March 2008 Who cares its not like it was an offensive gesture, why do we make stories out of nothing in this country?
Koke Posted 4 March 2008 Author Posted 4 March 2008 I'm sure that Tim is very much aware of the magnitude of his brother's cowardly actions but this does not stop the love that he has for him. He didn't go out and justify the crime, he just showed brotherly love. There are hundreds different ways you can interpretate that gesture. Should he had done it in private? Yes, that wold have been a lot wise. But the way some people are talking you'd think the lad is the scum of the earth and is the one who actually committed the brutal crime. Justice has been done and the the **** is in prison. Why the press is dwelling too much on it I will know - that's their job. That's how I see it anyway.
Chandler Posted 4 March 2008 Posted 4 March 2008 I'm sure that Tim is very much aware of the magnitude of his brother's cowardly actions but this does not stop the love that he has for him. He didn't go out and justify the crime, he just showed brotherly love. There are hundreds different ways you can interpretate that gesture.Should he had done it in private? Yes, that wold have been a lot wise. But the way some people are talking you'd think the lad is the scum of the earth and is the one who actually committed the brutal crime. Justice has been done and the the **** is in prison. Why the press is dwelling too much on it I will know - that's their job. That's how I see it anyway. Sorry chum, but you're labouring under a misapprehension there. I've seen too many Oz pilgrims (particularly those of Irish descent) on the Euro tour with chips on their shoulders about their cut throat ancestors' enforced transport to Botany Bay. who think it's their patriotic duty to drop a few Poms. And if they can't/wont do it themselves they'll give their 'moral support' to those that do.
The Stig Posted 4 March 2008 Posted 4 March 2008 I'm eating Jelly Tots They're bloody nice they are. Anyway, players should not be allowed to celebrate at all in case they upset someone. They should be allowed to shake hands with no more than two players, gather the ball and put it on the center spot so the match can resume, all of this showing as little emotion as possible.
Samilktray Posted 4 March 2008 Posted 4 March 2008 I take it you speak from experience? Don't tell me - you went on local radio to back your dad who is doing a strectch for child rape. You're not the brightest 'Samilktray' but I get the feeling the moral penny might have dropped - at least it seems to have for everybody else.... I may not be the brightest to you but i don't really try and ridicule other peoples opinions. But anyway hes apologized and explained why he did it now. Job done. Edit: Jelly tots are good.
breadandcheese Posted 4 March 2008 Posted 4 March 2008 Not often I agree with Chandler, but I do in this case. Cahill has now come out and insisted he meant to cause no pain to the victims or the family of the victims caused by his brother's violent and vicious actions. I think in this case, Cahill misjudged his gesture and I hope he now realises why he was wrong to make such a gesture.
BigGibbo Posted 4 March 2008 Posted 4 March 2008 Do you think people are going a bit OTT here?http://www.dailymail.co.uk/pages/live/arti...in_page_id=1770 Don't they always!
purpleronnie Posted 4 March 2008 Posted 4 March 2008 As I said, Cahill minor can offer private support to undeserving, cowardly Cahill major - there's no need to advertise it and bring more trauma to the victim and his family.And why do I get the feeling that if his big bro was a paedo Tim would be a little more circumspect in his 'support?' If the papers hadnt made such a big deal about it I'm sure the family wouldn't have known about it.
SOCCERROO FOX Posted 5 March 2008 Posted 5 March 2008 Sorry chum, but you're labouring under a misapprehension there. I've seen too many Oz pilgrims (particularly those of Irish descent) on the Euro tour with chips on their shoulders about their cut throat ancestors' enforced transport to Botany Bay. who think it's their patriotic duty to drop a few Poms. And if they can't/wont do it themselves they'll give their 'moral support' to those that do. Thats a bit Racist isn't As no Aussies give a sh it about something that happened 300+ years ago nor do we care I fell sorry for you Chandler if you think Aussies fight brits because Brits founded our country.
Hugo Sanchez Posted 5 March 2008 Posted 5 March 2008 Thats a bit Racist isn'tAs no Aussies give a sh it about something that happened 300+ years ago nor do we care I fell sorry for you Chandler if you think Aussies fight brits because Brits founded our country. I think most aussie's still hate the english for some pathetic reason .... 300 years ago it happened.
DanTheFoxBhoy Posted 5 March 2008 Posted 5 March 2008 No racism here... Chandler is suffering from "tool", something that is not confined to race.
SOCCERROO FOX Posted 5 March 2008 Posted 5 March 2008 No racism here... Chandler is suffering from "tool", something that is not confined to race. - i was trying to be polite cos he sounds like he has a screw loose.
Head Honcho Posted 5 March 2008 Posted 5 March 2008 Not often I agree with Chandler, but I do in this case.Cahill has now come out and insisted he meant to cause no pain to the victims or the family of the victims caused by his brother's violent and vicious actions. I think in this case, Cahill misjudged his gesture and I hope he now realises why he was wrong to make such a gesture. I find it extraordinary that only yourself, l444ry and Chandler have had any thought to the pain of the victim in all of this. I don't give a fvck where Cahill is from, at the end of the day he made a bad call but Everton and all the other fvckwits on here condoning it is far worse then anything Cahill done! As I said in an earlier post. Personally I couldn't give a toss, but we shouldn't be condoning his actions.
Chandler Posted 5 March 2008 Posted 5 March 2008 Thats a bit Racist isn'tAs no Aussies give a sh it about something that happened 300+ years ago nor do we care I fell sorry for you Chandler if you think Aussies fight brits because Brits founded our country. You're either in denial or you're a £10 Pom. The vast majority of Australians have a complex about their origins. Amongst themsevles they try to laugh off the fact that they are descended from mudererers, swindlers and prostitutes. But it's a different story when they come into contact with Brits. All of a sudden they become VERY touchy about it. And that's why 'Pommie Bashing' is their real national game.
The People's Hero Posted 5 March 2008 Posted 5 March 2008 You're either in denial or you're a £10 Pom.The vast majority of Australians have a complex about their origins. Amongst themsevles they try to laugh off the fact that they are descended from mudererers, swindlers and prostitutes. But it's a different story when they come into contact with Brits. All of a sudden they become VERY touchy about it. And that's why 'Pommie Bashing' is their real national game. Don't be a tw at.
Manwell Pablo Posted 5 March 2008 Posted 5 March 2008 There is no big deal. It's all been blown out of proportion. A player should be able to dedicate a goal celebration to whoever he wants. Theres worse things in football right now than blummin' goal celebrations. This is correct, now, to work on my Mira Hinley goal celebration for tonight. Any suggestions.
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.