stez Posted 11 September 2009 Posted 11 September 2009 remember you have to remove thne greed element
Zingari Posted 11 September 2009 Posted 11 September 2009 remember you have to remove thne greed element fook that's me out then but just in case 4 8 15 29 37 43
Craig Posted 11 September 2009 Posted 11 September 2009 Absolute rubbish, but i'll give it a go. 6, 30, 46, 3, 19, 25
Monk Posted 11 September 2009 Posted 11 September 2009 on average, 6 out of 7 dwarfs are dissatisfied
Zingari Posted 12 September 2009 Posted 12 September 2009 on average, 6 out of 7 dwarfs are dissatisfied which one had snow white ? my money's on Happy
Webbo Posted 12 September 2009 Author Posted 12 September 2009 Right that's it. 27 sets of numbers, rounding up /down as appropriate the numbers are; 8 13 16 27 30 35. Unless anyone disputes my maths I'll go and buy the ticket.
dogadug Posted 12 September 2009 Posted 12 September 2009 Right that's it.27 sets of numbers, rounding up /down as appropriate the numbers are; 8 13 16 27 30 35. Unless anyone disputes my maths I'll go and buy the ticket. go and buy the ticket, I'm sure your right
Zingari Posted 12 September 2009 Posted 12 September 2009 we'll soon see if Surowiecki was right with his "wisdom of the crowds" stuff
Matt Posted 12 September 2009 Posted 12 September 2009 Right that's it.27 sets of numbers, rounding up /down as appropriate the numbers are; 8 13 16 27 30 35. Unless anyone disputes my maths I'll go and buy the ticket. I will aswell, but just check the 3rd number again, I got exactly the same numbers as you except the 3rd number which I got 19 for.
Matt Posted 12 September 2009 Posted 12 September 2009 I will aswell, but just check the 3rd number again, I got exactly the same numbers as you except the 3rd number which I got 19 for. Just checked it again as I go 19 again, I don't trust my maths myself though (Even though I used a calculator) so can someone just check that.
Legend_in_blue Posted 12 September 2009 Posted 12 September 2009 This won't work Webbo. You shouldn't rush it. The more people you've got giving numbers in, the better chance of getting a good result out of it. It needs a planned approach. Get everyone to submit numbers over the week and then enter them into the draw for next Saturday. It's been rushed, I'm annoyed, I've missed the 10am deadline and I've only just woken up.
Webbo Posted 12 September 2009 Author Posted 12 September 2009 I will aswell, but just check the 3rd number again, I got exactly the same numbers as you except the 3rd number which I got 19 for. Looks like you're right. I've already bought the ticket though It could still be us though.
Webbo Posted 12 September 2009 Author Posted 12 September 2009 This won't work Webbo. You shouldn't rush it. The more people you've got giving numbers in, the better chance of getting a good result out of it. It needs a planned approach.Get everyone to submit numbers over the week and then enter them into the draw for next Saturday. If we get so much as a tenner at this I'll do it again for next weeks eurolottery £85million draw.
Webbo Posted 12 September 2009 Author Posted 12 September 2009 Has everyone gone MAD?! You won't be saying that when we're all posting from the South of France.
Bryn Posted 12 September 2009 Posted 12 September 2009 What the hell is this? I came in here expecting the same sense of outrage I had when he "revealed" his big secret. What a phenomenal crock of shit, it didn't make even a tiny bit of sense, it wasn't even plausible enough to make you wonder. His other experiments were enough to have me think "There's probably a really simple explanation but they're so clever that I'm intrigued and want to see more". Which of course is the whole point of an illusionist? But this? He's overstepped the mark, overplayed his hand and shattered his own mystique, in my opinion. Terrible, as far as I could see we all watched an hour and a half of his programming and we may as well have watched a man saw a woman in half in a glass box, it was about that convincing. And it disappoints me because like I say, he was entertaining and clever.
lavrentis Posted 12 September 2009 Posted 12 September 2009 I think we all know its not the way he did it but this is only a laugh!
Nod.E Posted 12 September 2009 Posted 12 September 2009 3, 4, 12, 27, 29, 40. I might actually have a go on this line, just cause i'd probably kill myself if I'd wrote them down like this, and not gambled on it!
Webbo Posted 12 September 2009 Author Posted 12 September 2009 What the hell is this?I came in here expecting the same sense of outrage I had when he "revealed" his big secret. What a phenomenal crock of shit, it didn't make even a tiny bit of sense, it wasn't even plausible enough to make you wonder. His other experiments were enough to have me think "There's probably a really simple explanation but they're so clever that I'm intrigued and want to see more". Which of course is the whole point of an illusionist? But this? He's overstepped the mark, overplayed his hand and shattered his own mystique, in my opinion. Terrible, as far as I could see we all watched an hour and a half of his programming and we may as well have watched a man saw a woman in half in a glass box, it was about that convincing. And it disappoints me because like I say, he was entertaining and clever. I agree with all of that, but it's only a laugh.
Bryn Posted 12 September 2009 Posted 12 September 2009 I agree with all of that, but it's only a laugh. Aye I realised about 5 minutes later that that belonged in the other thread really.
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.