Joethemightyone Posted 18 August 2011 Posted 18 August 2011 Is it me or has anybody else noticed Paul Konchesky getting progressively worse each game? He looked very good in pre-season and was assured vs Coventry (who wouldn't?) The last two games he has been close to sambolic. His positioning leaves me speechless sometimes. He never seems to be in the right place. His forward movement is an afterthought and his crosses are average. It has got to the point where I wouldn't mind PVA back . . .
danny. Posted 18 August 2011 Posted 18 August 2011 I thought he was one of the better players last night?
MPH Posted 18 August 2011 Posted 18 August 2011 Is it me or has anybody else noticed Paul Konchesky getting progressively worse each game? He looked very good in pre-season and was assured vs Coventry (who wouldn't?) The last two games he has been close to sambolic. His positioning leaves me speechless sometimes. He never seems to be in the right place. His forward movement is an afterthought and his crosses are average. It has got to the point where I wouldn't mind PVA back . . . Sambolic!
Adster Posted 18 August 2011 Posted 18 August 2011 Were you at any of the games this season? Paul Konchesky has been one of the better performers out of the whole bunch of new signings this season. I love the guy and he hasn't put much of a foot wrong. So yeah, it is just you.
Mike the Metal Ed Posted 18 August 2011 Posted 18 August 2011 Thought he played well first half, then the same mistakes and doubt seemed to set in to him too. Could be I noticed them more because every single one was punctuated with "KONCHESKY'S SHIT... GOD HE'S SHIT" by the [loyal supporter who has a right to air his views because he bought a ticket] in front of me.
Dr The Singh Posted 18 August 2011 Posted 18 August 2011 Solid defensive qualities, but in an attacking sense he has been poor, but I don't think that was his trait from begin with!!
Joethemightyone Posted 18 August 2011 Author Posted 18 August 2011 Ooops a missed 'h' Doh! I must be thick as shit . . . And yes I have been to every game this season thank you. Adster, what has the bald eagle done so brilliantly then?
nothin2seehere Posted 18 August 2011 Posted 18 August 2011 Let's start a thread with every squad player's name as the title and then proceed to say how shit they are. In fact, I think that may have already been done. Waghorn? Check. Mills? Check. Konchesky? ... HOW MANY MORE? I'm really bored of all this shit now. Can't wait for Forest
Babylon Posted 18 August 2011 Posted 18 August 2011 Is it me Yes. Defensively he wasn't any worse than the others. Seems rather slow going forward though, although he and Peltier never really went forward, mostly because is they went forward there would be zero cover on the right or left hand sides.
FrankieADZ Posted 18 August 2011 Posted 18 August 2011 it must be you. Cos I thought he's been one of our better players so far this season.
lestajigs Posted 18 August 2011 Posted 18 August 2011 Thought he was one off the better ones last night
THEFATBASTARD Posted 18 August 2011 Posted 18 August 2011 This just proves...in a free country every asshole has an opinion, why this lad has been singled out for stick is beyond me...konchesky has been one of the very few pluses so far this season.
Dan Posted 18 August 2011 Posted 18 August 2011 Full of basic errors for me last night, I think he's a better bet than PVA away from home but doesn't offer nearly as much going forward. I'll give him time, he's not looked that bad, but like I say - basic errors.
kingfox Posted 18 August 2011 Posted 18 August 2011 This is one of the worst articles I have ever seen in my entire life. Konchesky so far has been one of our most consistent performers and better players. Against Madrid he played well, against Coventry I heard he put in a consistent performance. Even against Reading even though he didn't attack that well, he was one of a few players who deserved credit from that game. Last night he attacked superbly, defended well against a dangerous opponent in Adomah. For me Konchesky has been one of our best signings so far.
Leicester_Loyal Posted 18 August 2011 Posted 18 August 2011 I'm with the other posters when they say the average IQ level of this forum is slowly decreasing. Absolute tools. I BLAME CHRIS POWELL FOR LEAVING, DISGRACE, SHOULD HAVE KEPT HIM, 100% WIN RATIO WITH US AND IS DOING WELL WITH CHARLTON. I ALSO BLAME ALL THE POSTERS ON HERE, CLEARLY THE PLAYERS ARE READING THIS AND DELIBERATELY PLAYING SHIT. SVEN OUT, TOP OUT, LETS MAKE A SUICIDE PACT BECAUSE ITS A DISGRACE. Over and out.
Joethemightyone Posted 18 August 2011 Author Posted 18 August 2011 Ooooo deary me. I have upset somebody haven't I. I apologise for discussing a Leicester City player on a Leicester City Forum. I watched him closely and he was very average. Watch him against Forest closely and then see if my 'completely outrageous views' are worthy of a thread.
lcfcsnow Posted 18 August 2011 Posted 18 August 2011 Not worth whatever we paid for him. Unlike last season, our full backs are very much safety first, one of the main reasons why we can't score or build attacks.
LCFC_FAN_1995 Posted 18 August 2011 Posted 18 August 2011 Were you at any of the games this season? Paul Konchesky has been one of the better performers out of the whole bunch of new signings this season. I love the guy and he hasn't put much of a foot wrong. So yeah, it is just you. fully agree with you! konchesky has been brilliant but Gallagher last night never helped him, such as when Konchesky wanted to do one two's but gallagher never did and always brought the ball back.
foxes2011 Posted 18 August 2011 Posted 18 August 2011 tbh konchesky is a pl player, you cant blame this on one player, its a problem with the team which ultimately stems with the manager im afraid
Bettsy82 Posted 18 August 2011 Posted 18 August 2011 He is excellent defensively but limited going forward.
Adster Posted 18 August 2011 Posted 18 August 2011 Ooops a missed 'h' Doh! I must be thick as shit . . . And yes I have been to every game this season thank you. Adster, what has the bald eagle done so brilliantly then? Well you must be looking at the sky rather than his performances then. What's he done right? Let me begin. His defending is solid, MUCH MUCH better than van Aanholts last year. How you can say his positioning is bad is well beyond me, he's always back at the time needs be, he organises himself perfectly and doesn't get skinned. He can track back from attacks as we've seen, when Bristol tried to hit us in the counter, Koncheskey tracked back and did the right thing. His movement is top notch, whilst some of his long over the top balls are not great, he moves in to some great space for people to pass it to him so he can go on the attack. Whilst his attacking ISN'T the best, he does a lot more right then he does wrong and I can't see how you can slate him as he's been one of our better performers clearly. If you don't see this then you clearly need your eyes testing. So yeah, it's just you. Good day.
Joethemightyone Posted 18 August 2011 Author Posted 18 August 2011 Oh just shut up Ohhhh okay, if you say so sir. What a numpty! I haven't blamed our shocking start on one player either. I made an analysis on a player I have watched closely every game. Maybe people who say he has been playing really well actually don't know much about being a FB. Infact I'll take a guess that you're the 'intelligent' one's who partake in the phone-ins. This forum is like 1940's Germany.
Callabinho Posted 18 August 2011 Posted 18 August 2011 He kept smashing long all the time, that pissed me off but he was okay! I thought peltier was the worse of the two full backs, much prefer paintsil!
kingfox Posted 18 August 2011 Posted 18 August 2011 You are calling Konchesky average and saying Van Aanholt was better. You deserve to be slated Joe
LCFC_FAN_1995 Posted 18 August 2011 Posted 18 August 2011 Ohhhh okay, if you say so sir. What a numpty! I haven't blamed our shocking start on one player either. I made an analysis on a player I have watched closely every game. Maybe people who say he has been playing really well actually don't know much about being a FB. Infact I'll take a guess that you're the 'intelligent' one's who partake in the phone-ins. This forum is like 1940's Germany. no i never have and never will, i love listening to them on phone-ins. I'm just getting annoyed by the constant threads saying why have we got him, sven out etc.
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.